# Learn Web Development with Rails

## Contents

Foreword

My former company (CD Baby) was one of the first to loudly switch to Ruby on Rails, and then even more loudly switch back to PHP (Google me to read about the drama). This book by Michael Hartl came so highly recommended that I had to try it, and the Ruby on Rails Tutorial is what I used to switch back to Rails again.

Though I’ve worked my way through many Rails books, this is the one that finally made me “get” it. Everything is done very much “the Rails way”—a way that felt very unnatural to me before, but now after doing this book finally feels natural. This is also the only Rails book that does test-driven development the entire time, an approach highly recommended by the experts but which has never been so clearly demonstrated before. Finally, by including Git, GitHub, and Heroku in the demo examples, the author really gives you a feel for what it’s like to do a real-world project. The tutorial’s code examples are not in isolation.

The linear narrative is such a great format. Personally, I powered through the Rails Tutorial in three long days, doing all the examples and challenges at the end of each chapter. Do it from start to finish, without jumping around, and you’ll get the ultimate benefit.

Enjoy!

Derek Sivers (sivers.org)
Founder, CD Baby

Acknowledgments

The Ruby on Rails Tutorial owes a lot to my previous Rails book, RailsSpace, and hence to my coauthor Aurelius Prochazka. I’d like to thank Aure both for the work he did on that book and for his support of this one. I’d also like to thank Debra Williams Cauley, my editor on both RailsSpace and the Ruby on Rails Tutorial; as long as she keeps taking me to baseball games, I’ll keep writing books for her.

I’d like to acknowledge a long list of Rubyists who have taught and inspired me over the years: David Heinemeier Hansson, Yehuda Katz, Carl Lerche, Jeremy Kemper, Xavier Noria, Ryan Bates, Geoffrey Grosenbach, Peter Cooper, Matt Aimonetti, Gregg Pollack, Wayne E. Seguin, Amy Hoy, Dave Chelimsky, Pat Maddox, Tom Preston-Werner, Chris Wanstrath, Chad Fowler, Josh Susser, Obie Fernandez, Ian McFarland, Steven Bristol, Pratik Naik, Sarah Mei, Sarah Allen, Wolfram Arnold, Alex Chaffee, Giles Bowkett, Evan Dorn, Long Nguyen, James Lindenbaum, Adam Wiggins, Tikhon Bernstam, Ron Evans, Wyatt Greene, Miles Forrest, the good people at Pivotal Labs, the Heroku gang, the thoughtbot guys, and the GitHub crew. Finally, many, many readers—far too many to list—have contributed a huge number of bug reports and suggestions during the writing of this book, and I gratefully acknowledge their help in making it as good as it can be.

Michael Hartl is the author of the Ruby on Rails Tutorial, the leading introduction to web development with Ruby on Rails. His prior experience includes writing and developing RailsSpace, an extremely obsolete Rails tutorial book, and developing Insoshi, a once-popular and now-obsolete social networking platform in Ruby on Rails. In 2011, Michael received a Ruby Hero Award for his contributions to the Ruby community. He is a graduate of Harvard College, has a Ph.D. in Physics from Caltech, and is an alumnus of the Y Combinator entrepreneur program.

Ruby on Rails Tutorial: Learn Web Development with Rails. Copyright © 2012 by Michael Hartl. All source code in the Ruby on Rails Tutorial is available jointly under the MIT License and the Beerware License.

The MIT License

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.

/*
* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* "THE BEER-WARE LICENSE" (Revision 42):
* Michael Hartl wrote this code. As long as you retain this notice you
* can do whatever you want with this stuff. If we meet some day, and you think
* this stuff is worth it, you can buy me a beer in return.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/


# Chapter 1 From zero to deploy

Welcome to the Ruby on Rails Tutorial. The goal of this book is to be the best answer to the question, “If I want to learn web development with Ruby on Rails, where should I start?” By the time you finish the Ruby on Rails Tutorial, you will have all the skills you need to develop and deploy your own custom web applications with Rails. You will also be ready to benefit from the many more advanced books, blogs, and screencasts that are part of the thriving Rails educational ecosystem. Finally, since the Ruby on Rails Tutorial uses Rails 3, the knowledge you gain here represents the state of the art in web development (Box 1.1). (The most up-to-date version of the Ruby on Rails Tutorial can be found on the book’s website at http://railstutorial.org/; if you are reading this book offline, be sure to check the online version of the Rails Tutorial book at http://railstutorial.org/book?version=3.2 for the latest updates.)

Note that the goal of this book is not merely to teach Rails, but rather to teach web development with Rails, which means acquiring (or expanding) the skills needed to develop software for the World Wide Web. In addition to Ruby on Rails, this skillset includes HTML & CSS, databases, version control, testing, and deployment. To accomplish this goal, the Ruby on Rails Tutorial takes an integrated approach: you will learn Rails by example by building a substantial sample application from scratch. As Derek Sivers notes in the foreword, this book is structured as a linear narrative, designed to be read from start to finish. If you are used to skipping around in technical books, taking this linear approach might require some adjustment, but I suggest giving it a try. You can think of the Ruby on Rails Tutorial as a video game where you are the main character, and where you level up as a Rails developer in each chapter. (The exercises are the minibosses.)

In this first chapter, we’ll get started with Ruby on Rails by installing all the necessary software and by setting up our development environment (Section 1.2). We’ll then create our first Rails application, called (appropriately enough) first_app. The Rails Tutorial emphasizes good software development practices, so immediately after creating our fresh new Rails project we’ll put it under version control with Git (Section 1.3). And, believe it or not, in this chapter we’ll even put our first app on the wider web by deploying it to production (Section 1.4).

In Chapter 2, we’ll make a second project, whose purpose is to demonstrate the basic workings of a Rails application. To get up and running quickly, we’ll build this demo app (called demo_app) using scaffolding (Box 1.2) to generate code; since this code is both ugly and complex, Chapter 2 will focus on interacting with the demo app through its URIs (sometimes called URLs)1 using a web browser.

The rest of the tutorial focuses on developing a single large sample application (called sample_app), writing all the code from scratch. We’ll develop the sample app using test-driven development (TDD), getting started in Chapter 3 by creating static pages and then adding a little dynamic content. We’ll take a quick detour in Chapter 4 to learn a little about the Ruby language underlying Rails. Then, in Chapter 5 through Chapter 9, we’ll complete the foundation for the sample application by making a site layout, a user data model, and a full registration and authentication system. Finally, in Chapter 10 and Chapter 11 we’ll add microblogging and social features to make a working example site.

The final sample application will bear more than a passing resemblance to a certain popular social microblogging site—a site which, coincidentally, was also originally written in Rails. Though of necessity our efforts will focus on this specific sample application, the emphasis throughout the Rails Tutorial will be on general principles, so that you will have a solid foundation no matter what kinds of web applications you want to build.

## 1.1 Introduction

Since its debut in 2004, Ruby on Rails has rapidly become one of the most powerful and popular frameworks for building dynamic web applications. Everyone from scrappy startups to huge companies have used Rails: 37signals, GitHub, Shopify, Scribd, Twitter, LivingSocial, Groupon, Hulu, the Yellow Pages—the list of sites using Rails goes on and on. There are also many web development shops that specialize in Rails, such as ENTP, thoughtbot, Pivotal Labs, and Hashrocket, plus innumerable independent consultants, trainers, and contractors.

What makes Rails so great? First of all, Ruby on Rails is 100% open-source, available under the permissive MIT License, and as a result it also costs nothing to download or use. Rails also owes much of its success to its elegant and compact design; by exploiting the malleability of the underlying Ruby language, Rails effectively creates a domain-specific language for writing web applications. As a result, many common web programming tasks—such as generating HTML, making data models, and routing URIs—are easy with Rails, and the resulting application code is concise and readable.

Rails also adapts rapidly to new developments in web technology and framework design. For example, Rails was one of the first frameworks to fully digest and implement the REST architectural style for structuring web applications (which we’ll be learning about throughout this tutorial). And when other frameworks develop successful new techniques, Rails creator David Heinemeier Hansson and the Rails core team don’t hesitate to incorporate their ideas. Perhaps the most dramatic example is the merger of Rails and Merb, a rival Ruby web framework, so that Rails now benefits from Merb’s modular design, stable API, and improved performance.

Finally, Rails benefits from an unusually enthusiastic and diverse community. The results include hundreds of open-source contributors, well-attended conferences, a huge number of plugins and gems (self-contained solutions to specific problems such as pagination and image upload), a rich variety of informative blogs, and a cornucopia of discussion forums and IRC channels. The large number of Rails programmers also makes it easier to handle the inevitable application errors: the “Google the error message” algorithm nearly always produces a relevant blog post or discussion-forum thread.

The Rails Tutorial contains integrated tutorials not only for Rails, but also for the underlying Ruby language, the RSpec testing framework, HTML, CSS, a small amount of JavaScript, and even a little SQL. This means that, no matter where you currently are in your knowledge of web development, by the time you finish this tutorial you will be ready for more advanced Rails resources, as well as for the more systematic treatments of the other subjects mentioned. It also means that there’s a lot of material to cover; if you don’t already have much experience programming computers, you might find it overwhelming. The comments below contain some suggestions for approaching the Rails Tutorial depending on your background.

All readers: One common question when learning Rails is whether to learn Ruby first. The answer depends on your personal learning style and how much programming experience you already have. If you prefer to learn everything systematically from the ground up, or if you have never programmed before, then learning Ruby first might work well for you, and in this case I recommend Beginning Ruby by Peter Cooper. On the other hand, many beginning Rails developers are excited about making web applications, and would rather not slog through a 500-page book on pure Ruby before ever writing a single web page. In this case, I recommend following the short interactive tutorial at Try Ruby,2 and then optionally do the free tutorial at Rails for Zombies3 to get a taste of what Rails can do.

Another common question is whether to use tests from the start. As noted in the introduction, the Rails Tutorial uses test-driven development (also called test-first development), which in my view is the best way to develop Rails applications, but it does introduce a substantial amount of overhead and complexity. If you find yourself getting bogged down by the tests, I suggest either skipping them on a first reading or (even better) using them as a tool to verify your code’s correctness without worrying about how they work. This latter strategy involves creating the necessary test files (called specs) and filling them with the test code exactly as it appears in the book. You can then run the test suite (as described in Chapter 5) to watch it fail, then write the application code as described in the tutorial, and finally re-run the test suite to watch it pass.

Inexperienced programmers: The Rails Tutorial is not aimed principally at beginning programmers, and web applications, even relatively simple ones, are by their nature fairly complex. If you are completely new to web programming and find the Rails Tutorial too difficult, I suggest learning the basics of HTML and CSS and then giving the Rails Tutorial another go. (Unfortunately, I don’t have a personal recommendation here, but Head First HTML looks promising, and one reader recommends CSS: The Missing Manual by David Sawyer McFarland.) You might also consider reading the first few chapters of Beginning Ruby by Peter Cooper, which starts with sample applications much smaller than a full-blown web app. That said, a surprising number of beginners have used this tutorial to learn web development, so I suggest giving it a try, and I especially recommend the Rails Tutorial screencast series4 to give you an “over-the-shoulder” look at Rails software development.

Experienced programmers new to web development: Your previous experience means you probably already understand ideas like classes, methods, data structures, etc., which is a big advantage. Be warned that if your background is in C/C++ or Java, you may find Ruby a bit of an odd duck, and it might take time to get used to it; just stick with it and eventually you’ll be fine. (Ruby even lets you put semicolons at the ends of lines if you miss them too much.) The Rails Tutorial covers all the web-specific ideas you’ll need, so don’t worry if you don’t currently know a PUT from a POST.

Experienced web developers new to Rails: You have a great head start, especially if you have used a dynamic language such as PHP or (even better) Python. The basics of what we cover will likely be familiar, but test-driven development may be new to you, as may be the structured REST style favored by Rails. Ruby has its own idiosyncrasies, so those will likely be new, too.

Experienced Ruby programmers: The set of Ruby programmers who don’t know Rails is a small one nowadays, but if you are a member of this elite group you can fly through this book and then move on to The Rails 3 Way by Obie Fernandez.

Inexperienced Rails programmers: You’ve perhaps read some other tutorials and made a few small Rails apps yourself. Based on reader feedback, I’m confident that you can still get a lot out of this book. Among other things, the techniques here may be more up-to-date than the ones you picked up when you originally learned Rails.

Experienced Rails programmers: This book is unnecessary for you, but many experienced Rails developers have expressed surprise at how much they learned from this book, and you might enjoy seeing Rails from a different perspective.

After finishing the Ruby on Rails Tutorial, I recommend that experienced programmers read The Well-Grounded Rubyist by David A. Black, which is an excellent in-depth discussion of Ruby from the ground up, or The Ruby Way by Hal Fulton, which is also fairly advanced but takes a more topical approach. Then move on to The Rails 3 Way to deepen your Rails expertise.

At the end of this process, no matter where you started, you should be ready for the many more intermediate-to-advanced Rails resources out there. Here are some I particularly recommend:

### 1.1.2 “Scaling” Rails

Before moving on with the rest of the introduction, I’d like to take a moment to address the one issue that dogged the Rails framework the most in its early days: the supposed inability of Rails to “scale”—i.e., to handle large amounts of traffic. Part of this issue relied on a misconception; you scale a site, not a framework, and Rails, as awesome as it is, is only a framework. So the real question should have been, “Can a site built with Rails scale?” In any case, the question has now been definitively answered in the affirmative: some of the most heavily trafficked sites in the world use Rails. Actually doing the scaling is beyond the scope of just Rails, but rest assured that if your application ever needs to handle the load of Hulu or the Yellow Pages, Rails won’t stop you from taking over the world.

### 1.1.3 Conventions in this book

The conventions in this book are mostly self-explanatory. In this section, I’ll mention some that may not be.

Both the HTML and PDF editions of this book are full of links, both to internal sections (such as Section 1.2) and to external sites (such as the main Ruby on Rails download page).5

Many examples in this book use command-line commands. For simplicity, all command line examples use a Unix-style command line prompt (a dollar sign), as follows:

$echo "hello, world" hello, world  Windows users should understand that their systems will use the analogous angle prompt >: C:\Sites> echo "hello, world" hello, world  On Unix systems, some commands should be executed with sudo, which stands for “substitute user do”.6 By default, a command executed with sudo is run as an administrative user, which has access to files and directories that normal users can’t touch, such as in this example from Section 1.2.2: $ sudo ruby setup.rb


Most Unix/Linux/OS X systems require sudo by default, unless you are using Ruby Version Manager as suggested in Section 1.2.2.3; in this case, you would type this instead:

$ruby setup.rb  Rails comes with lots of commands that can be run at the command line. For example, in Section 1.2.5 we’ll run a local development web server as follows: $ rails server


As with the command-line prompt, the Rails Tutorial uses the Unix convention for directory separators (i.e., a forward slash /). My Rails Tutorial sample application, for instance, lives in

/Users/mhartl/rails_projects/sample_app


On Windows, the analogous directory would be

C:\Sites\sample_app


The root directory for any given app is known as the Rails root, but this terminology is confusing and many people mistakenly believe that the “Rails root” is the root directory for Rails itself. For clarity, the Rails Tutorial will refer to the Rails root as the application root, and henceforth all directories will be relative to this directory. For example, the config directory of my sample application is

/Users/mhartl/rails_projects/sample_app/config


The application root directory here is everything before config, i.e.,

/Users/mhartl/rails_projects/sample_app


For brevity, when referring to the file

/Users/mhartl/rails_projects/sample_app/config/routes.rb


I’ll omit the application root and simply write config/routes.rb.

The Rails Tutorial often shows output from various programs (shell commands, version control status, Ruby programs, etc.). Because of the innumerable small differences between different computer systems, the output you see may not always agree exactly with what is shown in the text, but this is not cause for concern.

Some commands may produce errors depending on your system; rather than attempt the Sisyphean task of documenting all such errors in this tutorial, I will delegate to the “Google the error message” algorithm, which among other things is good practice for real-life software development. If you run into any problems while following the tutorial, I suggest consulting the resources listed on the Rails Tutorial help page.7

## 1.2 Up and running

I think of Chapter 1 as the “weeding out phase” in law school—if you can get your dev environment set up, the rest is easy to get through.

It’s time now to get going with a Ruby on Rails development environment and our first application. There is quite a bit of overhead here, especially if you don’t have extensive programming experience, so don’t get discouraged if it takes a while to get started. It’s not just you; every developer goes through it (often more than once), but rest assured that the effort will be richly rewarded.

### 1.2.1 Development environments

Considering various idiosyncratic customizations, there are probably as many development environments as there are Rails programmers, but there are at least two broad types: text editor/command line environments, and integrated development environments (IDEs). Let’s consider the latter first.

#### IDEs

There is no shortage of Rails IDEs, including RadRails, RubyMine, and 3rd Rail. I’ve heard especially good things about RubyMine, and one reader (David Loeffler) has assembled notes on how to use RubyMine with this tutorial.8 If you’re comfortable using an IDE, I suggest taking a look at the options mentioned to see what fits with the way you work.

#### Text editors and command lines

Instead of using an IDE, I prefer to use a text editor to edit text, and a command line to issue commands (Figure 1.1). Which combination you use depends on your tastes and your platform.

• Text editor: I recommend Sublime Text 2, an outstanding cross-platform text editor that is in beta as of this writing but has already proven to be exceptionally powerful. Sublime Text is heavily influenced by TextMate, and in fact is compatible with most TextMate customizations, such as snippets and color schemes. (TextMate, which is available only on OS X, is still a good choice if you use a Mac.) A second excellent choice is Vim,9 versions of which are available for all major platforms. Sublime Text can be obtained commercially, whereas Vim can be obtained at no cost; both are industrial-strength editors, but in my experience Sublime Text is much more accessible to beginners.
• Terminal: On OS X, I recommend either use iTerm or the native Terminal app. On Linux, the default terminal is fine. On Windows, many users prefer to develop Rails applications in a virtual machine running Linux, in which case your command-line options reduce to the previous case. If developing within Windows itself, I recommend using the command prompt that comes with Rails Installer (Section 1.2.2.1).

If you decide to use Sublime Text, you might want to follow the optional setup instructions for Rails Tutorial Sublime Text.10 (Such configuration settings can be fiddly and error-prone, so I mainly recommend them for more advanced users; Sublime Text is an excellent choice for editing Rails applications even without the advanced setup.)

#### Browsers

Although there are many web browsers to choose from, the vast majority of Rails programmers use Firefox, Safari, or Chrome when developing. The screenshots in Rails Tutorial will generally be of a Firefox browser. If you use Firefox, I suggest using the Firebug add-on, which lets you perform all sorts of magic, such as dynamically inspecting (and even editing) the HTML structure and CSS rules on any page. For those not using Firefox, both Safari and Chrome have a built-in “Inspect element” feature available by right-clicking on any part of the page.

In the process of getting your development environment up and running, you may find that you spend a lot of time getting everything just right. The learning process for editors and IDEs is particularly long; you can spend weeks on Sublime Text or Vim tutorials alone. If you’re new to this game, I want to assure you that spending time learning tools is normal. Everyone goes through it. Sometimes it is frustrating, and it’s easy to get impatient when you have an awesome web app in your head and you just want to learn Rails already, but have to spend a week learning some weird ancient Unix editor just to get started. But a craftsman has to know his tools, and in the end the reward is worth the effort.

### 1.2.2 Ruby, RubyGems, Rails, and Git

Practically all the software in the world is either broken or very difficult to use. So users dread software. They’ve been trained that whenever they try to install something, or even fill out a form online, it’s not going to work. I dread installing stuff, and I have a Ph.D. in computer science.
—Paul Graham, in Founders at Work by Jessica Livingston

Now it’s time to install Ruby and Rails. I’ve done my best to cover as many bases as possible, but systems vary, and many things can go wrong during these steps. Be sure to Google the error message or consult the Rails Tutorial help page if you run into trouble.

Unless otherwise noted, you should use the exact versions of all software used in the tutorial, including Rails itself, if you want the same results. Sometimes minor version differences will yield identical results, but you shouldn’t count on this, especially with respect to Rails versions. The main exception is Ruby itself: 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 are virtually identical for the purposes of this tutorial, so feel free to use either one.

#### Rails Installer (Windows)

Installing Rails on Windows used to be a real pain, but thanks to the efforts of the good people at Engine Yard—especially Dr. Nic Williams and Wayne E. Seguin—installing Rails and related software on Windows is now easy. If you are using Windows, go to Rails Installer and download the Rails Installer executable and view the excellent installation video. Double-click the executable and follow the instructions to install Git (so you can skip Section 1.2.2.2), Ruby (skip Section 1.2.2.3), RubyGems (skip Section 1.2.2.4), and Rails itself (skip Section 1.2.2.5). Once the installation has finished, you can skip right to the creation of the first application in Section 1.2.3.

Bear in mind that the Rails Installer might use a slightly different version of Rails from the one installed in Section 1.2.2.5, which might cause incompatibilities. To fix this, I am currently working with Nic and Wayne to create a list of Rails Installers ordered by Rails version number.

#### Install Git

Much of the Rails ecosystem depends in one way or another on a version control system called Git (covered in more detail in Section 1.3). Because its use is ubiquitous, you should install Git even at this early stage; I suggest following the installation instructions for your platform at the Installing Git section of Pro Git.

#### Install Ruby

The next step is to install Ruby. It’s possible that your system already has it; try running

$ruby -v ruby 1.9.3  to see the version number. Rails 3 requires Ruby 1.8.7 or later and works best with Ruby 1.9.x. This tutorial assumes that most readers are using Ruby 1.9.2 or 1.9.3, but Ruby 1.8.7 should work as well (although there is one syntax difference, covered in Chapter 4, and assorted minor differences in output). As part of installing Ruby, if you are using OS X or Linux I strongly recommend using Ruby Version Manager (RVM), which allows you to install and manage multiple versions of Ruby on the same machine. (The Pik project accomplishes a similar feat on Windows.) This is particularly important if you want to run different versions of Ruby or Rails on the same machine. If you run into any problems with RVM, you can often find its creator, Wayne E. Seguin, on the RVM IRC channel (#rvm on freenode.net).11 If you are running Linux, I particularly recommend How to install Ruby on Rails in Ubuntu on the Sudobits Blog. After installing RVM, you can install Ruby as follows:12 $ rvm get head && rvm reload
$rvm install 1.9.3 <wait a while>  Here the first command updates and reloads RVM itself, which is a good practice since RVM gets updated frequently. The second installs the 1.9.3 version of Ruby; depending on your system, they might take a while to download and compile, so don’t worry if it seems to be taking forever. Some OS X users have trouble with the lack of an autoconf executable, which you can fix by installing Homebrew13 (a package management system for OS X) and then running $ brew install automake
$rvm install 1.9.3  Some Linux users report having to include the path to a library called OpenSSL: $ rvm install 1.9.3 --with-openssl-dir=$HOME/.rvm/  On some older OS X systems, you might have to include the path to the readline library: $ rvm install 1.9.3 --with-readline-dir=/opt/local


(Like I said, lots of things can go wrong. The only solution is web searches and determination.)

After installing Ruby, you should configure your system for the other software needed to run Rails applications. This typically involves installing gems, which are self-contained packages of Ruby code. Since gems with different version numbers sometimes conflict, it is often convenient to create separate gemsets, which are self-contained bundles of gems. For the purposes of this tutorial, I suggest creating a gemset called rails3tutorial2ndEd:

$rvm use 1.9.3@rails3tutorial2ndEd --create --default Using /Users/mhartl/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3 with gemset rails3tutorial2ndEd  This command creates (--create) the gemset rails3tutorial2ndEd associated with Ruby 1.9.3 while arranging to start using it immediately (use) and setting it as the default (--default) gemset, so that any time we open a new terminal window the 1.9.3@rails3tutorial2ndEd Ruby/gemset combination is automatically selected. RVM supports a large variety of commands for manipulating gemsets; see the documentation at http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/gemsets/. If you ever get stuck with RVM, running commands like these should help you get your bearings: $ rvm help
$rvm gemset help  #### Install RubyGems RubyGems is a package manager for Ruby projects, and there are many useful libraries (including Rails) available as Ruby packages, or gems. Installing RubyGems should be easy once you install Ruby. In fact, if you have installed RVM, you already have RubyGems, since RVM includes it automatically: $ which gem
/Users/mhartl/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p0/bin/gem


If you don’t already have it, you should download RubyGems, extract it, and then go to the rubygems directory and run the setup program:

$ruby setup.rb  (If you get a permissions error here, recall from Section 1.1.3 that you may have to use sudo.) If you already have RubyGems installed, you should make sure your system uses the version used in this tutorial: $ gem update --system 1.8.24


Freezing your system to this particular version will help prevent conflicts as RubyGems changes in the future.

When installing gems, by default RubyGems generates two different kinds of documentation (called ri and rdoc), but many Ruby and Rails developers find that the time to build them isn’t worth the benefit. (Many programmers rely on online documentation instead of the native ri and rdoc documents.) To prevent the automatic generation of the documentation, I recommend making a gem configuration file called .gemrc in your home directory as in Listing 1.1 with the line in Listing 1.2. (The tilde “~” means “home directory”, while the dot . in .gemrc makes the file hidden, which is a common convention for configuration files. )

Listing 1.1. Creating a gem configuration file.
$subl ~/.gemrc  Here subl is the command-line command to launch Sublime Text on OS X, which you can set up using the Sublime Text 2 documentation for the OS X command line. If you’re on a different platform, or if you’re using a different editor, you should replace this command as necessary (i.e., by double-clicking the application icon or by using an alternate command such as mate, vim, gvim, or mvim). For brevity, throughout the rest of this tutorial I’ll use subl as a shorthand for “open with your favorite text editor.” Listing 1.2. Suppressing the ri and rdoc documentation in .gemrc. install: --no-rdoc --no-ri update: --no-rdoc --no-ri  #### Install Rails Once you’ve installed RubyGems, installing Rails should be easy. This tutorial standardizes on Rails 3.2, which we can install as follows: $ gem install rails -v 3.2.16


To check your Rails installation, run the following command to print out the version number:

$rails -v Rails 3.2.16  Note: If you installed Rails using the Rails Installer in Section 1.2.2.1, there might be slight version differences. As of this writing, those differences are not relevant, but in the future, as the current Rails version diverges from the one used in this tutorial, these differences may become significant. I am currently working with Engine Yard to create links to specific versions of the Rails Installer. If you’re running Linux, you might have to install a couple of other packages at this point: $ sudo apt-get install libxslt-dev libxml2-dev libsqlite3-dev # Linux only


### 1.2.3 The first application

Virtually all Rails applications start the same way, by running rails new command. This handy command creates a skeleton Rails application in a directory of your choice. To get started, make a directory for your Rails projects and then run rails new to make the first application (Listing 1.3):

Listing 1.3. Running rails new to generate a new application.
$mkdir rails_projects$ cd rails_projects
$rails new first_app create create README.rdoc create Rakefile create config.ru create .gitignore create Gemfile create app create app/assets/images/rails.png create app/assets/javascripts/application.js create app/assets/stylesheets/application.css create app/controllers/application_controller.rb create app/helpers/application_helper.rb create app/mailers create app/models create app/views/layouts/application.html.erb create app/mailers/.gitkeep create app/models/.gitkeep create config create config/routes.rb create config/application.rb create config/environment.rb . . . create vendor/plugins create vendor/plugins/.gitkeep run bundle install Fetching source index for https://rubygems.org/ . . . Your bundle is complete! Use bundle show [gemname] to see where a bundled gem is installed.  As seen at the end of Listing 1.3, running rails new automatically runs the bundle install command after the file creation is done. If that step doesn’t work right now, don’t worry; follow the steps in Section 1.2.4 and you should be able to get it to work. Notice how many files and directories the rails command creates. This standard directory and file structure (Figure 1.2) is one of the many advantages of Rails; it immediately gets you from zero to a functional (if minimal) application. Moreover, since the structure is common to all Rails apps, you can immediately get your bearings when looking at someone else’s code. A summary of the default Rails files appears in Table 1.1; we’ll learn about most of these files and directories throughout the rest of this book. In particular, starting in Section 5.2.1 we’ll discuss the app/assets directory, part of the asset pipeline (new as of Rails 3.1) that makes it easier than ever to organize and deploy assets such as cascading style sheets and JavaScript files. File/DirectoryPurpose app/Core application (app) code, including models, views, controllers, and helpers app/assetsApplications assets such as cascading style sheets (CSS), JavaScript files, and images config/Application configuration db/Database files doc/Documentation for the application lib/Library modules lib/assetsLibrary assets such as cascading style sheets (CSS), JavaScript files, and images log/Application log files public/Data accessible to the public (e.g., web browsers), such as error pages script/railsA script for generating code, opening console sessions, or starting a local server test/Application tests (made obsolete by the spec/ directory in Section 3.1.2) tmp/Temporary files vendor/Third-party code such as plugins and gems vendor/assetsThird-party assets such as cascading style sheets (CSS), JavaScript files, and images README.rdocA brief description of the application RakefileUtility tasks available via the rake command GemfileGem requirements for this app Gemfile.lockA list of gems used to ensure that all copies of the app use the same gem versions config.ruA configuration file for Rack middleware .gitignorePatterns for files that should be ignored by Git Table 1.1: A summary of the default Rails directory structure. ### 1.2.4 Bundler After creating a new Rails application, the next step is to use Bundler to install and include the gems needed by the app. As noted briefly in Section 1.2.3, Bundler is run automatically (via bundle install) by the rails command, but in this section we’ll make some changes to the default application gems and run Bundler again. This involves opening the Gemfile with your favorite text editor: $ cd first_app/
$subl Gemfile  The result should look something like Listing 1.4. The code in this file is Ruby, but don’t worry at this point about the syntax; Chapter 4 will cover Ruby in more depth. Listing 1.4. The default Gemfile in the first_app directory. source 'https://rubygems.org' gem 'rails', '3.2.16' # Bundle edge Rails instead: # gem 'rails', :git => 'git://github.com/rails/rails.git' gem 'sqlite3' # Gems used only for assets and not required # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '~> 3.2.3' gem 'coffee-rails', '~> 3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '>= 1.2.3' end gem 'jquery-rails' # To use ActiveModel has_secure_password # gem 'bcrypt-ruby', '~> 3.0.0' # To use Jbuilder templates for JSON # gem 'jbuilder' # Use unicorn as the web server # gem 'unicorn' # Deploy with Capistrano # gem 'capistrano' # To use debugger # gem 'ruby-debug19', :require => 'ruby-debug'  Many of these lines are commented out with the hash symbol #; they are there to show you some commonly needed gems and to give examples of the Bundler syntax. For now, we won’t need any gems other than the defaults: Rails itself, some gems related to the asset pipeline (Section 5.2.1), the gem for the jQuery JavaScript library, and the gem for the Ruby interface to the SQLite database. Unless you specify a version number to the gem command, Bundler will automatically install the latest version of the gem. Unfortunately, gem updates often cause minor but potentially confusing breakage, so in this tutorial we’ll include explicit version numbers known to work, as seen in Listing 1.5 (which also omits the commented-out lines from Listing 1.4). Listing 1.5. A Gemfile with an explicit version of each Ruby gem. source 'https://rubygems.org' gem 'rails', '3.2.16' group :development do gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5' end # Gems used only for assets and not required # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '3.2.5' gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3' end gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2'  Listing 1.5 changes the line for jQuery, the default JavaScript library used by Rails, from gem 'jquery-rails'  to gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2'  We’ve also changed gem 'sqlite3'  to group :development do gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5' end  which forces Bundler to install version 1.3.5 of the sqlite3 gem. Note that we’ve also taken this opportunity to arrange for SQLite to be included only in a development environment (Section 7.1.1), which prevents potential conflicts with the database used by Heroku (Section 1.4). Listing 1.5 also changes a few other lines, converting group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '~> 3.2.3' gem 'coffee-rails', '~> 3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '>= 1.2.3' end  to group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '3.2.5' gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3' end  The syntax gem 'uglifier', '>= 1.2.3'  installs the latest version of the uglifier gem (which handles file compression for the asset pipeline) as long as it’s greater than version 1.2.3—even if it’s, say, version 7.2. Meanwhile, the code gem 'coffee-rails', '~> 3.2.2'  installs the gem coffee-rails (also needed by the asset pipeline) as long as it’s lower than version 3.3. In other words, the >= notation always performs upgrades, whereas the ~> 3.2.2 notation only performs upgrades to minor point releases (e.g., from 3.2.1 to 3.2.2), but not to major point releases (e.g., from 3.2 to 3.3). Unfortunately, experience shows that even minor point releases can break things, so for the Rails Tutorial we’ll err on the side of caution by including exact version numbers for virtually all gems. (The only exception is gems that are in release candidate or beta stage as of this writing; for those gems, we’ll use ~> so that the final versions will be loaded once they’re done.) You are welcome to use the most up-to-date version of any gem, including using to the ~> construction in the Gemfile (which I generally recommend for more advanced users), but be warned that this may cause the tutorial to act unpredictably. Once you’ve assembled the proper Gemfile, install the gems using bundle update14 and bundle install: $ bundle update
$bundle install Fetching source index for https://rubygems.org/ . . .  If you’re running OS X and you get an error about missing Ruby header files (e.g., ruby.h) at this point, you may need to install Xcode. These are developer tools that came with your OS X installation disk, but to avoid the full installation I recommend the much smaller Command Line Tools for Xcode.15 If you get a libxslt error when installing the Nokogiri gem, try reinstalling Ruby: $ rvm reinstall 1.9.3
$bundle install  The bundle install command might take a few moments, but when it’s done our application will be ready to run. Note: This setup is fine for the first app, but it isn’t ideal. Chapter 3 covers a more powerful (and slightly more advanced) method for installing Ruby gems with Bundler. ### 1.2.5 rails server Thanks to running rails new in Section 1.2.3 and bundle install in Section 1.2.4, we already have an application we can run—but how? Happily, Rails comes with a command-line program, or script, that runs a local web server, visible only from your development machine: $ rails server
=> Booting WEBrick
=> Rails application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000
=> Call with -d to detach
=> Ctrl-C to shutdown server


(If your system complains about the lack of a JavaScript runtime, visit the execjs page at GitHub for a list of possibilities. I particularly recommend installing Node.js.) This tells us that the application is running on port number 300016 at the address 0.0.0.0. This address tells the computer to listen on every available IP address configured on that specific machine; in particular, we can view the application using the special address 127.0.0.1, which is also known as localhost. We can see the result of visiting http://localhost:3000/ in Figure 1.3.

To see information about our first application, click on the link “About your application’s environment”. The result is shown in Figure 1.4. (Figure 1.4 represents the environment on my machine when I made the screenshot; your results may differ.)

Of course, we don’t need the default Rails page in the long run, but it’s nice to see it working for now. We’ll remove the default page (and replace it with a custom home page) in Section 5.3.2.

### 1.2.6 Model-view-controller (MVC)

Even at this early stage, it’s helpful to get a high-level overview of how Rails applications work (Figure 1.5). You might have noticed that the standard Rails application structure (Figure 1.2) has an application directory called app/ with three subdirectories: models, views, and controllers. This is a hint that Rails follows the model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern, which enforces a separation between “domain logic” (also called “business logic”) from the input and presentation logic associated with a graphical user interface (GUI). In the case of web applications, the “domain logic” typically consists of data models for things like users, articles, and products, and the GUI is just a web page in a web browser.

When interacting with a Rails application, a browser sends a request, which is received by a web server and passed on to a Rails controller, which is in charge of what to do next. In some cases, the controller will immediately render a view, which is a template that gets converted to HTML and sent back to the browser. More commonly for dynamic sites, the controller interacts with a model, which is a Ruby object that represents an element of the site (such as a user) and is in charge of communicating with the database. After invoking the model, the controller then renders the view and returns the complete web page to the browser as HTML.

If this discussion seems a bit abstract right now, worry not; we’ll refer back to this section frequently. In addition, Section 2.2.2 has a more detailed discussion of MVC in the context of the demo app. Finally, the sample app will use all aspects of MVC; we’ll cover controllers and views starting in Section 3.1.2, models starting in Section 6.1, and we’ll see all three working together in Section 7.1.2.

## 1.3 Version control with Git

Now that we have a fresh and working Rails application, we’ll take a moment for a step that, while technically optional, would be viewed by many Rails developers as practically essential, namely, placing our application source code under version control. Version control systems allow us to track changes to our project’s code, collaborate more easily, and roll back any inadvertent errors (such as accidentally deleting files). Knowing how to use a version control system is a required skill for every software developer.

There are many options for version control, but the Rails community has largely standardized on Git, a distributed version control system originally developed by Linus Torvalds to host the Linux kernel. Git is a large subject, and we’ll only be scratching the surface in this book, but there are many good free resources online; I especially recommend Pro Git by Scott Chacon (Apress, 2009). Putting your source code under version control with Git is strongly recommended, not only because it’s nearly a universal practice in the Rails world, but also because it will allow you to share your code more easily (Section 1.3.4) and deploy your application right here in the first chapter (Section 1.4).

### 1.3.1 Installation and setup

The first step is to install Git if you haven’t yet followed the steps in Section 1.2.2.2. (As noted in that section, this involves following the instructions in the Installing Git section of Pro Git.)

#### First-time system setup

After installing Git, you should perform a set of one-time setup steps. These are system setups, meaning you only have to do them once per computer:

$git config --global user.name "Your Name"$ git config --global user.email your.email@example.com


I also like to use co in place of the more verbose checkout command, which we can arrange as follows:

$git config --global alias.co checkout  This tutorial will usually use the full checkout command, which works for systems that don’t have co configured, but in real life I nearly always use git co. As a final setup step, you can optionally set the editor Git will use for commit messages. If you use a graphical editor such as Sublime Text, TextMate, gVim, or MacVim, you need to use a flag to make sure that the editor stays attached to the shell instead of detaching immediately:17 $ git config --global core.editor "subl -w"


Replace "subl -w" with "mate -w" for TextMate, "gvim -f" for gVim, or "mvim -f" for MacVim.

#### First-time repository setup

Now we come to some steps that are necessary each time you create a new repository. First navigate to the root directory of the first app and initialize a new repository:

$git init Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/mhartl/rails_projects/first_app/.git/  The next step is to add the project files to the repository. There’s a minor complication, though: by default Git tracks the changes of all the files, but there are some files we don’t want to track. For example, Rails creates log files to record the behavior of the application; these files change frequently, and we don’t want our version control system to have to update them constantly. Git has a simple mechanism to ignore such files: simply include a file called .gitignore in the application root directory with some rules telling Git which files to ignore.18 Looking again at Table 1.1, we see that the rails command creates a default .gitignore file in the application root directory, as shown in Listing 1.6. Listing 1.6. The default .gitignore created by the rails command. # See http://help.github.com/ignore-files/ for more about ignoring files. # # If you find yourself ignoring temporary files generated by your text editor # or operating system, you probably want to add a global ignore instead: # git config --global core.excludesfile ~/.gitignore_global # Ignore bundler config /.bundle # Ignore the default SQLite database. /db/*.sqlite3 # Ignore all logfiles and tempfiles. /log/*.log /tmp  Listing 1.6 causes Git to ignore files such as log files, Rails temporary (tmp) files, and SQLite databases. (For example, to ignore log files, which live in the log/ directory, we use log/*.log to ignore all files that end in .log.) Most of these ignored files change frequently and automatically, so including them under version control is inconvenient; moreover, when collaborating with others they can cause frustrating and irrelevant conflicts. The .gitignore file in Listing 1.6 is probably sufficient for this tutorial, but depending on your system you may find Listing 1.7 more convenient. This augmented .gitignore arranges to ignore Rails documentation files, Vim and Emacs swap files, and (for OS X users) the weird .DS_Store directories created by the Mac Finder application. If you want to use this broader set of ignored files, open up .gitignore in your favorite text editor and fill it with the contents of Listing 1.7. Listing 1.7. An augmented .gitignore file. # Ignore bundler config /.bundle # Ignore the default SQLite database. /db/*.sqlite3 # Ignore all logfiles and tempfiles. /log/*.log /tmp # Ignore other unneeded files. database.yml doc/ *.swp *~ .project .DS_Store .idea  ### 1.3.2 Adding and committing Finally, we’ll add the files in your new Rails project to Git and then commit the results. You can add all the files (apart from those that match the ignore patterns in .gitignore) as follows: $ git add .


Here the dot ‘.’ represents the current directory, and Git is smart enough to add the files recursively, so it automatically includes all the subdirectories. This command adds the project files to a staging area, which contains pending changes to your project; you can see which files are in the staging area using the status command:19

$git status # On branch master # # Initial commit # # Changes to be committed: # (use "git rm --cached <file>..." to unstage) # # new file: README.rdoc # new file: Rakefile . . .  (The results are long, so I’ve used vertical dots to indicate omitted output.) To tell Git you want to keep the changes, use the commit command: $ git commit -m "Initial commit"
[master (root-commit) df0a62f] Initial commit
42 files changed, 8461 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Rakefile
.
.
.


The -m flag lets you add a message for the commit; if you omit -m, Git will open the editor you set in Section 1.3.1 and have you enter the message there.

It is important to note that Git commits are local, recorded only on the machine on which the commits occur. This is in contrast to the popular open-source version control system called Subversion, in which a commit necessarily makes changes on a remote repository. Git divides a Subversion-style commit into its two logical pieces: a local recording of the changes (git commit) and a push of the changes up to a remote repository (git push). We’ll see an example of the push step in Section 1.3.5.

By the way, you can see a list of your commit messages using the log command:

$git log commit df0a62f3f091e53ffa799309b3e32c27b0b38eb4 Author: Michael Hartl <michael@michaelhartl.com> Date: Thu Oct 15 11:36:21 2009 -0700 Initial commit  To exit git log, you may have to type q to quit. ### 1.3.3 What good does Git do you? It’s probably not entirely clear at this point why putting your source under version control does you any good, so let me give just one example. (We’ll see many others in the chapters ahead.) Suppose you’ve made some accidental changes, such as (D’oh!) deleting the critical app/controllers/ directory: $ ls app/controllers/
application_controller.rb
$rm -rf app/controllers/$ ls app/controllers/
ls: app/controllers/: No such file or directory


Here we’re using the Unix ls command to list the contents of the app/controllers/ directory and the rm command to remove it. The -rf flag means “recursive force”, which recursively removes all files, directories, subdirectories, and so on, without asking for explicit confirmation of each deletion.

Let’s check the status to see what’s up:

$git status # On branch master # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) # # deleted: app/controllers/application_controller.rb # no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")  We see here that a file has been deleted, but the changes are only on the “working tree”; they haven’t been committed yet. This means we can still undo the changes easily by having Git check out the previous commit with the checkout command (and a -f flag to force overwriting the current changes): $ git checkout -f
$git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean)$ ls app/controllers/
application_controller.rb


The missing directory and file are back. That’s a relief!

### 1.3.4 GitHub

Now that you’ve put your project under version control with Git, it’s time to push your code up to GitHub, a social code site optimized for hosting and sharing Git repositories. Putting a copy of your Git repository at GitHub serves two purposes: it’s a full backup of your code (including the full history of commits), and it makes any future collaboration much easier. This step is optional, but being a GitHub member will open the door to participating in a wide variety of open-source projects.

GitHub has a variety of paid plans, but for open-source code their services are free, so sign up for a free GitHub account if you don’t have one already. (You might have to follow the GitHub tutorial on creating SSH keys first.) After signing up, click on the link to create a repository and fill in the information as in Figure 1.6. (Take care not to initialize the repository with a README file, as rails new creates one of those automatically.) After submitting the form, push up your first application as follows:

$git remote add origin https://github.com/<username>/first_app.git$ git push -u origin master


These commands tell Git that you want to add GitHub as the origin for your main (master) branch and then push your repository up to GitHub. (Don’t worry about what the -u flag does; if you’re curious, do a web search for “git set upstream”.) Of course, you should replace <username> with your actual username. For example, the command I ran was

$git remote add origin https://github.com/mhartl/first_app.git  The result is a page at GitHub for the first application repository, with file browsing, full commit history, and lots of other goodies (Figure 1.7). GitHub also has native applications to augment the command-line interface, so if you’re more comfortable with GUI apps you might want to check out GitHub for Windows or GitHub for Mac. (GitHub for Linux is still just Git, it seems.) ### 1.3.5 Branch, edit, commit, merge If you’ve followed the steps in Section 1.3.4, you might notice that GitHub automatically shows the contents of the README file on the main repository page. In our case, since the project is a Rails application generated using the rails command, the README file is the one that comes with Rails (Figure 1.8). Because of the .rdoc extension on the file, GitHub ensures that it is formatted nicely, but the contents aren’t helpful at all, so in this section we’ll make our first edit by changing the README to describe our project rather than the Rails framework itself. In the process, we’ll see a first example of the branch, edit, commit, merge workflow that I recommend using with Git. #### Branch Git is incredibly good at making branches, which are effectively copies of a repository where we can make (possibly experimental) changes without modifying the parent files. In most cases, the parent repository is the master branch, and we can create a new topic branch by using checkout with the -b flag: $ git checkout -b modify-README
Switched to a new branch 'modify-README'
$subl README.md  Listing 1.8. The new README file, README.md. # Ruby on Rails Tutorial: first application This is the first application for [*Ruby on Rails Tutorial: Learn Rails by Example*](http://railstutorial.org/) by [Michael Hartl](http://michaelhartl.com/).  #### Commit With the changes made, we can take a look at the status of our branch: $ git status
# Changes to be committed:
#   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
#
#
# Changed but not updated:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
#   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
#
#


At this point, we could use git add . as in Section 1.3.2, but Git provides the -a flag as a shortcut for the (very common) case of committing all modifications to existing files (or files created using git mv, which don’t count as new files to Git):

$git commit -a -m "Improve the README file" 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 243 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 README.rdoc create mode 100644 README.md  Be careful about using the -a flag improperly; if you have added any new files to the project since the last commit, you still have to tell Git about them using git add first. Note that we write the commit message in the present tense. Git models commits as a series of patches, and in this context it makes sense to describe what each commit does, rather than what it did. Moreover, this usage matches up with the commit messages generated by Git commands themselves. See the GitHub post Shiny new commit styles for more information. #### Merge Now that we’ve finished making our changes, we’re ready to merge the results back into our master branch: $ git checkout master
Switched to branch 'master'
$git merge modify-README Updating 34f06b7..2c92bef Fast forward README.rdoc | 243 -------------------------------------------------- README.md | 5 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 243 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 README.rdoc create mode 100644 README.md  Note that the Git output frequently includes things like 34f06b7, which are related to Git’s internal representation of repositories. Your exact results will differ in these details, but otherwise should essentially match the output shown above. After you’ve merged in the changes, you can tidy up your branches by deleting the topic branch using git branch -d if you’re done with it: $ git branch -d modify-README


This step is optional, and in fact it’s quite common to leave the topic branch intact. This way you can switch back and forth between the topic and master branches, merging in changes every time you reach a natural stopping point.

As mentioned above, it’s also possible to abandon your topic branch changes, in this case with git branch -D:

# For illustration only; don't do this unless you mess up a branch
$git checkout -b topic-branch$ <really screw up the branch>
$git add .$ git commit -a -m "Major screw up"
$git checkout master$ git branch -D topic-branch


Unlike the -d flag, the -D flag will delete the branch even though we haven’t merged in the changes.

#### Push

Now that we’ve updated the README, we can push the changes up to GitHub to see the result. Since we have already done one push (Section 1.3.4), on most systems we can omit origin master, and simply run git push:

$git push  As promised, GitHub nicely formats the new file using Markdown (Figure 1.9). ## 1.4 Deploying Even at this early stage, we’re already going to deploy our (still-empty) Rails application to production. This step is optional, but deploying early and often allows us to catch any deployment problems early in our development cycle. The alternative—deploying only after laborious effort sealed away in a development environment—often leads to terrible integration headaches when launch time comes.21 Deploying Rails applications used to be a pain, but the Rails deployment ecosystem has matured rapidly in the past few years, and now there are several great options. These include shared hosts or virtual private servers running Phusion Passenger (a module for the Apache and Nginx22 web servers), full-service deployment companies such as Engine Yard and Rails Machine, and cloud deployment services such as Engine Yard Cloud and Heroku. My favorite Rails deployment option is Heroku, which is a hosted platform built specifically for deploying Rails and other web applications.23 Heroku makes deploying Rails applications ridiculously easy—as long as your source code is under version control with Git. (This is yet another reason to follow the Git setup steps in Section 1.3 if you haven’t already.) The rest of this section is dedicated to deploying our first application to Heroku. ### 1.4.1 Heroku setup Heroku uses the PostgreSQL database (pronounced “post-gres-cue-ell”, and often called “Postgres” for short), which means that we need to add the pg gem in the production environment to allow Rails to talk to Postgres: group :production do gem 'pg', '0.12.2' end  Appending this code to the Gemfile from Listing 1.5 yields Listing 1.9. Listing 1.9. A Gemfile with an added pg gem for PostgreSQL. source 'https://rubygems.org' gem 'rails', '3.2.16' group :development do gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5' end # Gems used only for assets and not required # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '3.2.5' gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3' end gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2' group :production do gem 'pg', '0.12.2' end  To install it, we run bundle install with a special flag: $ bundle install --without production


The --without production option prevents the local installation of any production gems, which in this case is just pg. (Because the only gem we’ve added is restricted to a production environment, right now this command doesn’t actually install any additional local gems, but it’s needed to update Gemfile.lock since that’s what Heroku uses to infer the gem requirements of our application.)

There’s one last bit of configuration left, which is to create the files Heroku needs to serve static assets like images and CSS:

$rake assets:precompile$ git commit -a -m "Add precompiled assets for Heroku"


(This uses the rake command, which we’ll cover in more detail in Section 2.2.)

Next we have to create and configure a new Heroku account. The first step is to sign up for Heroku; after checking your email to complete the creation of your account, install the necessary Heroku software using the Heroku Toolbelt.24 Then use the heroku command to log in at the command line (you may have to exit and restart your terminal program first):

$heroku login  Finally, navigate back to your Rails project directory and use the heroku command to create a place on the Heroku servers for the sample app to live (Listing 1.10). Listing 1.10. Creating a new application at Heroku. $ cd ~/rails_projects/first_app


### 1.4.3 Heroku deployment, step two

There is no step two! We’re already done (Figure 1.10). To see your newly deployed application, you can visit the address that you saw when you ran heroku create (i.e., Listing 1.10, but with the address for your app, not the address for mine). You can also use an argument to the heroku command that automatically opens your browser with the right address:

$heroku open  Because of the details of their setup, the “About your application’s environment” link doesn’t work on Heroku. Don’t worry; this is normal. The error will go away (in the context of the full sample application) when we remove the default Rails page in Section 5.3.2. Once you’ve deployed successfully, Heroku provides a beautiful interface for administering and configuring your application (Figure 1.11). ### 1.4.4 Heroku commands There are many Heroku commands, and we’ll barely scratch the surface in this book. Let’s take a minute to show just one of them by renaming the application as follows: $ heroku rename railstutorial


Don’t use this name yourself; it’s already taken by me! In fact, you probably shouldn’t bother with this step right now; using the default address supplied by Heroku is fine. But if you do want to rename your application, you can arrange for it to be reasonably secure by using a random or obscure subdomain, such as the following:

hwpcbmze.heroku.com
seyjhflo.heroku.com
jhyicevg.heroku.com

With a random subdomain like this, someone could visit your site only if you gave them the address. (By the way, as a preview of Ruby’s compact awesomeness, here’s the code I used to generate the random subdomains:

('a'..'z').to_a.shuffle[0..7].join


Pretty sweet.)

In addition to supporting subdomains, Heroku also supports custom domains. (In fact, the Ruby on Rails Tutorial site lives at Heroku; if you’re reading this book online, you’re looking at a Heroku-hosted site right now!) See the Heroku documentation for more information about custom domains and other Heroku topics.

## 1.5 Conclusion

We’ve come a long way in this chapter: installation, development environment setup, version control, and deployment. If you want to share your progress at this point, feel free to send a tweet or Facebook status update with something like this:

All that’s left is to actually start learning Rails! Let’s get to it.

1. URI stands for Uniform Resource Identifier, while the slightly less general URL stands for Uniform Resource Locator. In practice, the URI is usually equivalent to “the thing you see in the address bar of your browser”.
2. http://tryruby.org/
3. http://railsforzombies.org/
4. http://railstutorial.org/screencasts
5. When reading the Rails Tutorial, you may find it convenient to follow an internal section link to look at the reference and then immediately go back to where you were before. This is easy when reading the book as a web page, since you can just use the Back button of your browser, but both Adobe Reader and OS X’s Preview allow you to do this with the PDF as well. In Reader, you can right-click on the document and select “Previous View” to go back. In Preview, use the Go menu: Go > Back
6. Many people erroneously believe that sudo stands for “superuser do” because it runs commands as the superuser (root) by default. In fact, sudo is a concatenation of the su command and the English word “do”, and su stands for “substitute user”, as you can verify by typing man su in your shell.
7. http://railstutorial.org/help
8. https://github.com/perfectionist/sample_project/wiki
9. The vi editor is one of the most ancient yet powerful weapons in the Unix arsenal, and Vim is “vi improved”.
10. https://github.com/mhartl/rails_tutorial_sublime_text
11. If you haven’t used IRC before, I suggest you start by searching the web for “irc client <your platform>”. Two good native clients for OS X are Colloquy and LimeChat. And of course there’s always the web interface at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=rvm
12. You might have to install the Subversion version control system to get this to work.
13. http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/
14. This step is necessary only if you’ve changed the version of the Rails gem, which would likely happen only if you’re using Rails Installer, but it does no harm to run it in other cases as well.
16. Normally, websites run on port 80, but this usually requires special privileges, so Rails picks a less restricted higher-numbered port for the development server.
17. Normally this is a feature, since it lets you continue to use the command line after launching your editor, but Git interprets the detachment as closing the file with an empty commit message, which prevents the commit from going through. I only mention this point because it can be seriously confusing if you try to set your editor to subl or gvim without the flag. If you find this note confusing, feel free to ignore it.
18. If you can’t see the .gitignore file in your directory, you may need to configure your directory viewer to show hidden files.
19. If in the future any unwanted files start showing up when you type git status, just add them to your .gitignore file from Listing 1.7
20. See the chapter Git Branching in Pro Git for details.
21. Though it shouldn’t matter for the example applications in the Rails Tutorial, if you’re worried about accidentally making your app public too soon there are several options; see Section 1.4.4 for one.
22. Pronounced “Engine X”.
23. Heroku works with any Ruby web platform that uses Rack middleware, which provides a standard interface between web frameworks and web servers. Adoption of the Rack interface has been extraordinarily strong in the Ruby community, including frameworks as varied as Sinatra, Ramaze, Camping, and Rails, which means that Heroku basically supports any Ruby web app.
24. https://toolbelt.heroku.com/

# Chapter 2 A demo app

In this chapter, we’ll develop a simple demonstration application to show off some of the power of Rails. The purpose is to get a high-level overview of Ruby on Rails programming (and web development in general) by rapidly generating an application using scaffold generators. As discussed in Box 1.2, the rest of the book will take the opposite approach, developing a full application incrementally and explaining each new concept as it arises, but for a quick overview (and some instant gratification) there is no substitute for scaffolding. The resulting demo app will allow us to interact with it through its URIs, giving us insight into the structure of a Rails application, including a first example of the REST architecture favored by Rails.

As with the forthcoming sample application, the demo app will consist of users and their associated microposts (thus constituting a minimalist Twitter-style app). The functionality will be utterly under-developed, and many of the steps will seem like magic, but worry not: the full sample app will develop a similar application from the ground up starting in Chapter 3, and I will provide plentiful forward-references to later material. In the mean time, have patience and a little faith—the whole point of this tutorial is to take you beyond this superficial, scaffold-driven approach to achieve a deeper understanding of Rails.

## 2.1 Planning the application

In this section, we’ll outline our plans for the demo application. As in Section 1.2.3, we’ll start by generating the application skeleton using the rails command:

$cd ~/rails_projects$ rails new demo_app
$cd demo_app  Next, we’ll use a text editor to update the Gemfile needed by Bundler with the contents of Listing 2.1. Listing 2.1. A Gemfile for the demo app. source 'https://rubygems.org' gem 'rails', '3.2.14' group :development do gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5' end # Gems used only for assets and not required # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '3.2.5' gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3' end gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2' group :production do gem 'pg', '0.12.2' end  Note that Listing 2.1 is identical to Listing 1.9. As in Section 1.4.1, we’ll install the local gems while suppressing the installation of production gems using the --without production option: $ bundle update
$bundle install --without production  Finally, we’ll put the demo app under version control. Recall that the rails command generates a default .gitignore file, but depending on your system you may find the augmented file from Listing 1.7 to be more convenient. Then initialize a Git repository and make the first commit: $ git init
$git add .$ git commit -m "Initial commit"


You can also optionally create a new repository (Figure 2.1) and push it up to GitHub:

$git remote add origin https://github.com/<username>/demo_app.git$ git push -u origin master


(As with the first app, take care not to initialize the GitHub repository with a README file.)

Now we’re ready to start making the app itself. The typical first step when making a web application is to create a data model, which is a representation of the structures needed by our application. In our case, the demo app will be a microblog, with only users and short (micro)posts. Thus, we’ll begin with a model for users of the app (Section 2.1.1), and then we’ll add a model for microposts (Section 2.1.2).

### 2.1.1 Modeling demo users

There are as many choices for a user data model as there are different registration forms on the web; we’ll go with a distinctly minimalist approach. Users of our demo app will have a unique integer identifier called id, a publicly viewable name (of type string), and an email address (also a string) that will double as a username. A summary of the data model for users appears in Figure 2.2.

As we’ll see starting in Section 6.1.1, the label users in Figure 2.2 corresponds to a table in a database, and the id, name, and email attributes are columns in that table.

### 2.1.2 Modeling demo microposts

The core of the micropost data model is even simpler than the one for users: a micropost has only an id and a content field for the micropost’s text (of type string).1 There’s an additional complication, though: we want to associate each micropost with a particular user; we’ll accomplish this by recording the user_id of the owner of the post. The results are shown in Figure 2.3.

We’ll see in Section 2.3.3 (and more fully in Chapter 10) how this user_id attribute allows us to succinctly express the notion that a user potentially has many associated microposts.

## 2.2 The Users resource

In this section, we’ll implement the users data model in Section 2.1.1, along with a web interface to that model. The combination will constitute a Users resource, which will allow us to think of users as objects that can be created, read, updated, and deleted through the web via the HTTP protocol. As promised in the introduction, our Users resource will be created by a scaffold generator program, which comes standard with each Rails project. I urge you not to look too closely at the generated code; at this stage, it will only serve to confuse you.

Rails scaffolding is generated by passing the scaffold command to the rails generate script. The argument of the scaffold command is the singular version of the resource name (in this case, User), together with optional parameters for the data model’s attributes:2

$rails generate scaffold User name:string email:string invoke active_record create db/migrate/20111123225336_create_users.rb create app/models/user.rb invoke test_unit create test/unit/user_test.rb create test/fixtures/users.yml route resources :users invoke scaffold_controller create app/controllers/users_controller.rb invoke erb create app/views/users create app/views/users/index.html.erb create app/views/users/edit.html.erb create app/views/users/show.html.erb create app/views/users/new.html.erb create app/views/users/_form.html.erb invoke test_unit create test/functional/users_controller_test.rb invoke helper create app/helpers/users_helper.rb invoke test_unit create test/unit/helpers/users_helper_test.rb invoke assets invoke coffee create app/assets/javascripts/users.js.coffee invoke scss create app/assets/stylesheets/users.css.scss invoke scss create app/assets/stylesheets/scaffolds.css.scss  By including name:string and email:string, we have arranged for the User model to have the form shown in Figure 2.2. (Note that there is no need to include a parameter for id; it is created automatically by Rails for use as the primary key in the database.) To proceed with the demo application, we first need to migrate the database using Rake (Box 2.1): $ bundle exec rake db:migrate
==  CreateUsers: migrating ====================================================
-- create_table(:users)
-> 0.0017s
==  CreateUsers: migrated (0.0018s) ===========================================


This simply updates the database with our new users data model. (We’ll learn more about database migrations starting in Section 6.1.1.) Note that, in order to ensure that the command uses the version of Rake corresponding to our Gemfile, we need to run rake using bundle exec.

With that, we can run the local web server using rails s, which is a shortcut for rails server:

$rails s  Now the demo application should be ready to go at http://localhost:3000/. ### 2.2.1 A user tour Visiting the root url http://localhost:3000/ shows the same default Rails page shown in Figure 1.3, but in generating the Users resource scaffolding we have also created a large number of pages for manipulating users. For example, the page for listing all users is at /users, and the page for making a new user is at /users/new. The rest of this section is dedicated to taking a whirlwind tour through these user pages. As we proceed, it may help to refer to Table 2.1, which shows the correspondence between pages and URIs. URIActionPurpose /usersindexpage to list all users /users/1showpage to show user with id 1 /users/newnewpage to make a new user /users/1/editeditpage to edit user with id 1 Table 2.1: The correspondence between pages and URIs for the Users resource. We start with the page to show all the users in our application, called index; as you might expect, initially there are no users at all (Figure 2.4). To make a new user, we visit the new page, as shown in Figure 2.5. (Since the http://localhost:3000 part of the address is implicit whenever we are developing locally, I’ll usually omit it from now on.) In Chapter 7, this will become the user signup page. We can create a user by entering name and email values in the text fields and then clicking the Create User button. The result is the user show page, as seen in Figure 2.6. (The green welcome message is accomplished using the flash, which we’ll learn about in Section 7.4.2.) Note that the URI is /users/1; as you might suspect, the number 1 is simply the user’s id attribute from Figure 2.2. In Section 7.1, this page will become the user’s profile. To change a user’s information, we visit the edit page (Figure 2.7). By modifying the user information and clicking the Update User button, we arrange to change the information for the user in the demo application (Figure 2.8). (As we’ll see in detail starting in Chapter 6, this user data is stored in a database back-end.) We’ll add user edit/update functionality to the sample application in Section 9.1. Now we’ll create a second user by revisiting the new page and submitting a second set of user information; the resulting user index is shown in Figure 2.9. Section 7.1 will develop the user index into a more polished page for showing all users. Having shown how to create, show, and edit users, we come finally to destroying them (Figure 2.10). You should verify that clicking on the link in Figure 2.10 destroys the second user, yielding an index page with only one user. (If it doesn’t work, be sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser; Rails uses JavaScript to issue the request needed to destroy a user.) Section 9.4 adds user deletion to the sample app, taking care to restrict its use to a special class of administrative users. ### 2.2.2 MVC in action Now that we’ve completed a quick overview of the Users resource, let’s examine one particular part of it in the context of the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern introduced in Section 1.2.6. Our strategy will be to describe the results of a typical browser hit—a visit to the user index page at /users—in terms of MVC (Figure 2.11). 1. The browser issues a request for the /users URI. 2. Rails routes /users to the index action in the Users controller. 3. The index action asks the User model to retrieve all users (User.all). 4. The User model pulls all the users from the database. 5. The User model returns the list of users to the controller. 6. The controller captures the users in the @users variable, which is passed to the index view. 7. The view uses embedded Ruby to render the page as HTML. 8. The controller passes the HTML back to the browser.3 We start with a request issued from the browser—i.e., the result of typing a URI in the address bar or clicking on a link (Step 1 in Figure 2.11). This request hits the Rails router (Step 2), which dispatches to the proper controller action based on the URI (and, as we’ll see in Box 3.2, the type of request). The code to create the mapping of user URIs to controller actions for the Users resource appears in Listing 2.2; this code effectively sets up the table of URI/action pairs seen in Table 2.1. (The strange notation :users is a symbol, which we’ll learn about in Section 4.3.3.) Listing 2.2. The Rails routes, with a rule for the Users resource. config/routes.rb DemoApp::Application.routes.draw do resources :users . . . end  The pages from the tour in Section 2.2.1 correspond to actions in the Users controller, which is a collection of related actions; the controller generated by the scaffolding is shown schematically in Listing 2.3. Note the notation class UsersController < ApplicationController; this is an example of a Ruby class with inheritance. (We’ll discuss inheritance briefly in Section 2.3.4 and cover both subjects in more detail in Section 4.4.) Listing 2.3. The Users controller in schematic form. app/controllers/users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController def index . . . end def show . . . end def new . . . end def create . . . end def edit . . . end def update . . . end def destroy . . . end end  You may notice that there are more actions than there are pages; the index, show, new, and edit actions all correspond to pages from Section 2.2.1, but there are additional create, update, and destroy actions as well. These actions don’t typically render pages (although they sometimes do); instead, their main purpose is to modify information about users in the database. This full suite of controller actions, summarized in Table 2.2, represents the implementation of the REST architecture in Rails (Box 2.2), which is based on the ideas of representational state transfer identified and named by computer scientist Roy Fielding.4 Note from Table 2.2 that there is some overlap in the URIs; for example, both the user show action and the update action correspond to the URI /users/1. The difference between them is the HTTP request method they respond to. We’ll learn more about HTTP request methods starting in Section 3.2.1. HTTP requestURIActionPurpose GET/usersindexpage to list all users GET/users/1showpage to show user with id 1 GET/users/newnewpage to make a new user POST/userscreatecreate a new user GET/users/1/editeditpage to edit user with id 1 PUT/users/1updateupdate user with id 1 DELETE/users/1destroydelete user with id 1 Table 2.2: RESTful routes provided by the Users resource in Listing 2.2. To examine the relationship between the Users controller and the User model, let’s focus on a simplified version of the index action, shown in Listing 2.4. (The scaffold code is ugly and confusing, so I’ve suppressed it.) Listing 2.4. The simplified user index action for the demo application. app/controllers/users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController def index @users = User.all end . . . end  This index action has the line @users = User.all (Step 3), which asks the User model to retrieve a list of all the users from the database (Step 4), and then places them in the variable @users (pronounced “at-users”) (Step 5). The User model itself appears in Listing 2.5; although it is rather plain, it comes equipped with a large amount of functionality because of inheritance (Section 2.3.4 and Section 4.4). In particular, by using the Rails library called Active Record, the code in Listing 2.5 arranges for User.all to return all the users. (We’ll learn about the attr_accessible line in Section 6.1.2.2. Note: This line will not appear if you are using Rails 3.2.2 or earlier.) Listing 2.5. The User model for the demo application. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :email, :name end  Once the @users variable is defined, the controller calls the view (Step 6), shown in Listing 2.6. Variables that start with the @ sign, called instance variables, are automatically available in the view; in this case, the index.html.erb view in Listing 2.6 iterates through the @users list and outputs a line of HTML for each one. (Remember, you aren’t supposed to understand this code right now. It is shown only for purposes of illustration.) Listing 2.6. The view for the user index. app/views/users/index.html.erb <h1>Listing users</h1> <table> <tr> <th>Name</th> <th>Email</th> <th></th> <th></th> <th></th> </tr> <% @users.each do |user| %> <tr> <td><%= user.name %></td> <td><%= user.email %></td> <td><%= link_to 'Show', user %></td> <td><%= link_to 'Edit', edit_user_path(user) %></td> <td><%= link_to 'Destroy', user, method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'Are you sure?' } %></td> </tr> <% end %> </table> <br /> <%= link_to 'New User', new_user_path %>  The view converts its contents to HTML (Step 7), which is then returned by the controller to the browser for display (Step 8). ### 2.2.3 Weaknesses of this Users resource Though good for getting a general overview of Rails, the scaffold Users resource suffers from a number of severe weaknesses. • No data validations. Our User model accepts data such as blank names and invalid email addresses without complaint. • No authentication. We have no notion of signing in or out, and no way to prevent any user from performing any operation. • No tests. This isn’t technically true—the scaffolding includes rudimentary tests—but the generated tests are ugly and inflexible, and they don’t test for data validation, authentication, or any other custom requirements. • No layout. There is no consistent site styling or navigation. • No real understanding. If you understand the scaffold code, you probably shouldn’t be reading this book. ## 2.3 The Microposts resource Having generated and explored the Users resource, we turn now to the associated Microposts resource. Throughout this section, I recommend comparing the elements of the Microposts resource with the analogous user elements from Section 2.2; you should see that the two resources parallel each other in many ways. The RESTful structure of Rails applications is best absorbed by this sort of repetition of form; indeed, seeing the parallel structure of Users and Microposts even at this early stage is one of the prime motivations for this chapter. (As we’ll see, writing applications more robust than the toy example in this chapter takes considerable effort—we won’t see the Microposts resource again until Chapter 10—and I didn’t want to defer its first appearance quite that far.) ### 2.3.1 A micropost microtour As with the Users resource, we’ll generate scaffold code for the Microposts resource using rails generate scaffold, in this case implementing the data model from Figure 2.3:5 $ rails generate scaffold Micropost content:string user_id:integer
invoke  active_record
create    db/migrate/20111123225811_create_microposts.rb
create    app/models/micropost.rb
invoke    test_unit
create      test/unit/micropost_test.rb
create      test/fixtures/microposts.yml
route  resources :microposts
invoke  scaffold_controller
create    app/controllers/microposts_controller.rb
invoke    erb
create      app/views/microposts
create      app/views/microposts/index.html.erb
create      app/views/microposts/edit.html.erb
create      app/views/microposts/show.html.erb
create      app/views/microposts/new.html.erb
create      app/views/microposts/_form.html.erb
invoke    test_unit
create      test/functional/microposts_controller_test.rb
invoke    helper
create      app/helpers/microposts_helper.rb
invoke      test_unit
create        test/unit/helpers/microposts_helper_test.rb
invoke  assets
invoke    coffee
create      app/assets/javascripts/microposts.js.coffee
invoke    scss
create      app/assets/stylesheets/microposts.css.scss
invoke  scss
identical    app/assets/stylesheets/scaffolds.css.scss


To update our database with the new data model, we need to run a migration as in Section 2.2:

$bundle exec rake db:migrate == CreateMicroposts: migrating =============================================== -- create_table(:microposts) -> 0.0023s == CreateMicroposts: migrated (0.0026s) ======================================  Now we are in a position to create microposts in the same way we created users in Section 2.2.1. As you might guess, the scaffold generator has updated the Rails routes file with a rule for Microposts resource, as seen in Listing 2.7.6 As with users, the resources :microposts routing rule maps micropost URIs to actions in the Microposts controller, as seen in Table 2.3. Listing 2.7. The Rails routes, with a new rule for Microposts resources. config/routes.rb DemoApp::Application.routes.draw do resources :microposts resources :users . . . end  HTTP requestURIActionPurpose GET/micropostsindexpage to list all microposts GET/microposts/1showpage to show micropost with id 1 GET/microposts/newnewpage to make a new micropost POST/micropostscreatecreate a new micropost GET/microposts/1/editeditpage to edit micropost with id 1 PUT/microposts/1updateupdate micropost with id 1 DELETE/microposts/1destroydelete micropost with id 1 Table 2.3: RESTful routes provided by the Microposts resource in Listing 2.7. The Microposts controller itself appears in schematic form Listing 2.8. Note that, apart from having MicropostsController in place of UsersController, Listing 2.8 is identical to the code in Listing 2.3. This is a reflection of the REST architecture common to both resources. Listing 2.8. The Microposts controller in schematic form. app/controllers/microposts_controller.rb class MicropostsController < ApplicationController def index . . . end def show . . . end def new . . . end def create . . . end def edit . . . end def update . . . end def destroy . . . end end  To make some actual microposts, we enter information at the new microposts page, /microposts/new, as seen in Figure 2.12. At this point, go ahead and create a micropost or two, taking care to make sure that at least one has a user_id of 1 to match the id of the first user created in Section 2.2.1. The result should look something like Figure 2.13. ### 2.3.2 Putting the micro in microposts Any micropost worthy of the name should have some means of enforcing the length of the post. Implementing this constraint in Rails is easy with validations; to accept microposts with at most 140 characters (à la Twitter), we use a length validation. At this point, you should open the file app/models/micropost.rb in your text editor or IDE and fill it with the contents of Listing 2.9. (The use of validates in Listing 2.9 is characteristic of Rails 3; if you’ve previously worked with Rails 2.3, you should compare this to the use of validates_length_of.) Listing 2.9. Constraining microposts to be at most 140 characters. app/models/micropost.rb class Micropost < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :content, :user_id validates :content, :length => { :maximum => 140 } end  The code in Listing 2.9 may look rather mysterious—we’ll cover validations more thoroughly starting in Section 6.2—but its effects are readily apparent if we go to the new micropost page and enter more than 140 characters for the content of the post. As seen in Figure 2.14, Rails renders error messages indicating that the micropost’s content is too long. (We’ll learn more about error messages in Section 7.3.2.) ### 2.3.3 A user has_many microposts One of the most powerful features of Rails is the ability to form associations between different data models. In the case of our User model, each user potentially has many microposts. We can express this in code by updating the User and Micropost models as in Listing 2.10 and Listing 2.11. Listing 2.10. A user has many microposts. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :email, :name has_many :microposts end  Listing 2.11. A micropost belongs to a user. app/models/micropost.rb class Micropost < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :content, :user_id belongs_to :user validates :content, :length => { :maximum => 140 } end  We can visualize the result of this association in Figure 2.15. Because of the user_id column in the microposts table, Rails (using Active Record) can infer the microposts associated with each user. In Chapter 10 and Chapter 11, we will use the association of users and microposts both to display all a user’s microposts and to construct a Twitter-like micropost feed. For now, we can examine the implications of the user-micropost association by using the console, which is a useful tool for interacting with Rails applications. We first invoke the console with rails console at the command line, and then retrieve the first user from the database using User.first (putting the results in the variable first_user):7 $ rails console
>> first_user = User.first
=> #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "michael@example.org",
created_at: "2011-11-03 02:01:31", updated_at: "2011-11-03 02:01:31">
>> first_user.microposts
=> [#<Micropost id: 1, content: "First micropost!", user_id: 1, created_at:
"2011-11-03 02:37:37", updated_at: "2011-11-03 02:37:37">, #<Micropost id: 2,
content: "Second micropost", user_id: 1, created_at: "2011-11-03 02:38:54",
updated_at: "2011-11-03 02:38:54">]
>> exit


(I include the last line just to demonstrate how to exit the console, and on most systems you can Ctrl-d for the same purpose.) Here we have accessed the user’s microposts using the code first_user.microposts: with this code, Active Record automatically returns all the microposts with user_id equal to the id of first_user (in this case, 1). We’ll learn much more about the association facilities in Active Record in Chapter 10 and Chapter 11.

### 2.3.4 Inheritance hierarchies

We end our discussion of the demo application with a brief description of the controller and model class hierarchies in Rails. This discussion will only make much sense if you have some experience with object-oriented programming (OOP); if you haven’t studied OOP, feel free to skip this section. In particular, if you are unfamiliar with classes (discussed in Section 4.4), I suggest looping back to this section at a later time.

We start with the inheritance structure for models. Comparing Listing 2.12 and Listing 2.13, we see that both the User model and the Micropost model inherit (via the left angle bracket <) from ActiveRecord::Base, which is the base class for models provided by ActiveRecord; a diagram summarizing this relationship appears in Figure 2.16. It is by inheriting from ActiveRecord::Base that our model objects gain the ability to communicate with the database, treat the database columns as Ruby attributes, and so on.

Listing 2.12. The User class, with inheritance.
app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
.
.
.
end

Listing 2.13. The Micropost class, with inheritance.
app/models/micropost.rb
class Micropost < ActiveRecord::Base
.
.
.
end


The inheritance structure for controllers is only slightly more complicated. Comparing Listing 2.14 and Listing 2.15, we see that both the Users controller and the Microposts controller inherit from the Application controller. Examining Listing 2.16, we see that ApplicationController itself inherits from ActionController::Base; this is the base class for controllers provided by the Rails library Action Pack. The relationships between these classes is illustrated in Figure 2.17.

Listing 2.14. The UsersController class, with inheritance.
app/controllers/users_controller.rb
class UsersController < ApplicationController
.
.
.
end

Listing 2.15. The MicropostsController class, with inheritance.
app/controllers/microposts_controller.rb
class MicropostsController < ApplicationController
.
.
.
end

Listing 2.16. The ApplicationController class, with inheritance.
app/controllers/application_controller.rb
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
.
.
.
end


As with model inheritance, by inheriting ultimately from ActionController::Base both the Users and Microposts controllers gain a large amount of functionality, such as the ability to manipulate model objects, filter inbound HTTP requests, and render views as HTML. Since all Rails controllers inherit from ApplicationController, rules defined in the Application controller automatically apply to every action in the application. For example, in Section 8.2.1 we’ll see how to include helpers for signing in and signing out of all of the sample application’s controllers.

### 2.3.5 Deploying the demo app

With the completion of the Microposts resource, now is a good time to push the repository up to GitHub:

$git add .$ git commit -m "Finish demo app"
$git push  Ordinarily, you should make smaller, more frequent commits, but for the purposes of this chapter a single big commit at the end is fine. At this point, you can also deploy the demo app to Heroku as in Section 1.4: $ heroku create
$rake assets:precompile$ git commit -a -m "Add precompiled assets for Heroku"
$git push heroku master  Finally, migrate the production database (see below if you get a deprecation warning): $ heroku run rake db:migrate


This updates the database at Heroku with the necessary user/micropost data model. You may get a deprecation warning regarding assets in vendor/plugins, which you should ignore since there aren’t any plugins in that directory.

## 2.4 Conclusion

We’ve come now to the end of the 30,000-foot view of a Rails application. The demo app developed in this chapter has several strengths and a host of weaknesses.

Strengths

• High-level overview of Rails
• Introduction to MVC
• First taste of the REST architecture
• Beginning data modeling
• A live, database-backed web application in production

Weaknesses

• No custom layout or styling
• No static pages (like “Home” or “About”)
• No user images
• No signing in
• No security
• No automatic user/micropost association
• No notion of “following” or “followed”
• No micropost feed
• No test-driven development
• No real understanding

The rest of this tutorial is dedicated to building on the strengths and eliminating the weaknesses.

1. When modeling longer posts, such as those for a normal (non-micro) blog, you should use the text type in place of string
2. The name of the scaffold follows the convention of models, which are singular, rather than resources and controllers, which are plural. Thus, we have User instead Users
3. Some references indicate that the view returns the HTML directly to the browser (via a web server such as Apache or Nginx). Regardless of the implementation details, I prefer to think of the controller as a central hub through which all the application’s information flows.
4. Fielding, Roy Thomas. Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, 2000.
5. As with the User scaffold, the scaffold generator for microposts follows the singular convention of Rails models; thus, we have generate Micropost
6. The scaffold code may have extra newlines compared to Listing 2.7. This is not a cause for concern, as Ruby ignores extra newlines.
7. Your console prompt might be something like ruby-1.9.3-head >, but the examples use >> since Ruby versions will vary.

# Chapter 3 Mostly static pages

In this chapter, we will begin developing the sample application that will serve as our example throughout the rest of this tutorial. Although the sample app will eventually have users, microposts, and a full login and authentication framework, we will begin with a seemingly limited topic: the creation of static pages. Despite its apparent simplicity, making static pages is a highly instructive exercise, rich in implications—a perfect start for our nascent application.

Although Rails is designed for making database-backed dynamic websites, it also excels at making the kind of static pages we might make with raw HTML files. In fact, using Rails even for static pages yields a distinct advantage: we can easily add just a small amount of dynamic content. In this chapter we’ll learn how. Along the way, we’ll get our first taste of automated testing, which will help us be more confident that our code is correct. Moreover, having a good test suite will allow us to refactor our code with confidence, changing its form without changing its function.

There’s a lot of code in this chapter, especially in Section 3.2 and Section 3.3, and if you’re new to Ruby you shouldn’t worry about understanding the details right now. As noted in Section 1.1.1, one strategy is to copy-and-paste the tests and use them to verify the application code, without worrying at this point how they work. In addition, Chapter 4 covers Ruby in more depth, so there is plenty of opportunity for these ideas to sink in. Finally, RSpec tests will recur throughout the tutorial, so if you get stuck now I recommend forging ahead; you’ll be amazed how, after just a few more chapters, initially inscrutable code will suddenly look simple.

As in Chapter 2, before getting started we need to create a new Rails project, this time called sample_app:

$cd ~/rails_projects$ rails new sample_app --skip-test-unit
$cd sample_app  Here the --skip-test-unit option to the rails command tells Rails not to generate a test directory associated with the default Test::Unit framework. This is not because we won’t be writing tests; on the contrary, starting in Section 3.2 we will be using an alternate testing framework called RSpec to write a thorough test suite. As in Section 2.1, our next step is to use a text editor to update the Gemfile with the gems needed by our application. On the other hand, for the sample application we’ll also need two gems we didn’t need before: the gem for RSpec and the gem for the RSpec library specific to Rails. The code to include them is shown in Listing 3.1. (Note: If you would like to install all the gems needed for the sample application, you should use the code in Listing 9.48 at this time.) Listing 3.1. A Gemfile for the sample app. source 'https://rubygems.org' gem 'rails', '3.2.14' group :development, :test do gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5' gem 'rspec-rails', '2.11.0' end # Gems used only for assets and not required # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem 'sass-rails', '3.2.5' gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2' gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3' end gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2' group :test do gem 'capybara', '1.1.2' end group :production do gem 'pg', '0.12.2' end  This includes rspec-rails in development mode so that we have access to RSpec-specific generators, and it includes it in test mode in order to run the tests. We don’t have to install RSpec itself because it is a dependency of rspec-rails and will thus be installed automatically. We also include the Capybara gem, which allows us to simulate a user’s interaction with the sample application using a natural English-like syntax.1 As in Chapter 2, we also must include the PostgreSQL gem in production for deployment to Heroku: group :production do gem 'pg', '0.12.2' end  Heroku recommends against using different databases in development and production, but for the sample application it won’t make any difference, and SQLite is much easier than PostgreSQL to install and configure. Installing and configuring PostgreSQL on your local machine is left as an exercise (Section 3.5). To install and include the new gems, we run bundle update and bundle install: $ bundle update
$bundle install --without production  As in Section 1.4.1 and Chapter 2, we suppress the installation of production gems using the option --without production. This is a “remembered option”, which means that we don’t have to include it in future invocations of Bundler. Instead, we can write simply bundle install and production gems will be ignored automatically.2 Next, we need to configure Rails to use RSpec in place of Test::Unit. This can be accomplished with rails generate rspec:install: $ rails generate rspec:install


If your system complains about the lack of a JavaScript runtime, visit the execjs page at GitHub for a list of possibilities. I particularly recommend installing Node.js.

With that, all we have left is to initialize the Git repository:3

$git init$ git add .
$git commit -m "Initial commit"  As with the first application, I suggest updating the README file (located in the root directory of the application) to be more helpful and descriptive, as shown in Listing 3.2. Listing 3.2. An improved README file for the sample app. # Ruby on Rails Tutorial: sample application This is the sample application for [*Ruby on Rails Tutorial: Learn Rails by Example*](http://railstutorial.org/) by [Michael Hartl](http://michaelhartl.com/).  Then change it to use the Markdown extension .md and commit the changes: $ git mv README.rdoc README.md
$git commit -a -m "Improve the README"  Since we’ll be using this sample app throughout the rest of the book, it’s a good idea to make a repository at GitHub (Figure 3.1) and push it up: $ git remote add origin https://github.com/<username>/sample_app.git
$git push -u origin master  As a result of my performing this step, you can find the Rails Tutorial sample application code on GitHub (under a slightly different name).4 Of course, we can optionally deploy the app to Heroku even at this early stage: $ heroku create
$rake assets:precompile$ git commit -a -m "Add precompiled assets for Heroku"
$git push heroku master  As you proceed through the rest of the book, I recommend pushing and deploying the application regularly: $ git push
$git push heroku  This provides remote backups and lets you catch any production errors as soon as possible. If you run into problems at Heroku, make sure to take a look at the production logs to try to diagnose the problem: $ heroku logs


With all the preparation finished, we’re finally ready to get started developing the sample application.

## 3.1 Static pages

Rails has two main ways of making static web pages. First, Rails can handle truly static pages consisting of raw HTML files. Second, Rails allows us to define views containing raw HTML, which Rails can render so that the web server can send it to the browser.

In order to get our bearings, it’s helpful to recall the Rails directory structure from Section 1.2.3 (Figure 1.2). In this section, we’ll be working mainly in the app/controllers and app/views directories. (In Section 3.2, we’ll even add a new directory of our own.)

This is the first section where it’s useful to be able to open the entire Rails directory in your text editor or IDE. Unfortunately, how to do this is system-dependent, but in many cases you can open the current application directory, represented in Unix by a dot ., using the command-line command for your editor of choice:

$cd ~/rails_projects/sample_app$ <editor name> .


For example, to open the sample app in Sublime Text, you type

$subl .  For Vim, you type vim ., gvim ., or mvim . depending on which flavor of Vim you use. ### 3.1.1 Truly static pages We start with truly static pages. Recall from Section 1.2.5 that every Rails application comes with a minimal working application thanks to the rails script, with a default welcome page at the address http://localhost:3000/ (Figure 1.3). To learn where this page comes from, take a look at the file public/index.html (Figure 3.2). Because the file contains its own stylesheet information, it’s a little messy, but it gets the job done: by default, Rails serves any files in the public directory directly to the browser.5 In the case of the special index.html file, you don’t even have to indicate the file in the URI, as index.html is the default. You can include it if you want, though; the addresses http://localhost:3000/ http://localhost:3000/index.html are equivalent. As you might expect, if we want we can make our own static HTML files and put them in the same public directory as index.html. For example, let’s create a file with a friendly greeting (Listing 3.3):6 $ subl public/hello.html

Listing 3.3. A typical HTML file, with a friendly greeting.
public/hello.html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>Greeting</title>
<body>
<p>Hello, world!</p>
</body>
</html>


We see in Listing 3.3 the typical structure of an HTML document: a document type, or doctype, declaration at the top to tell browsers which version of HTML we’re using (in this case, HTML5);7 a head section, in this case with “Greeting” inside a title tag; and a body section, in this case with “Hello, world!” inside a p (paragraph) tag. (The indentation is optional—HTML is not sensitive to whitespace, and ignores both tabs and spaces—but it makes the document’s structure easier to see.)

Now run a local server using

$rails server  and navigate to http://localhost:3000/hello.html. As promised, Rails renders the page straightaway (Figure 3.3). Note that the title displayed at the top of the browser window in Figure 3.3 is just the contents inside the title tag, namely, “Greeting”. Since this file is just for demonstration purposes, we don’t really want it to be part of our sample application, so it’s probably best to remove it once the thrill of creating it has worn off: $ rm public/hello.html


We’ll leave the index.html file alone for now, but of course eventually we should remove it: we don’t want the root of our application to be the Rails default page shown in Figure 1.3. We’ll see in Section 5.3 how to change the address http://localhost:3000/ to point to something other than public/index.html.

### 3.1.2 Static pages with Rails

The ability to return static HTML files is nice, but it’s not particularly useful for making dynamic web applications. In this section, we’ll take a first step toward making dynamic pages by creating a set of Rails actions, which are a more powerful way to define URIs than static files.8 Rails actions come bundled together inside controllers (the C in MVC from Section 1.2.6), which contain sets of actions related by a common purpose. We got a glimpse of controllers in Chapter 2, and will come to a deeper understanding once we explore the REST architecture more fully (starting in Chapter 6); in essence, a controller is a container for a group of (possibly dynamic) web pages.

To get started, recall from Section 1.3.5 that, when using Git, it’s a good practice to do our work on a separate topic branch rather than the master branch. If you’re using Git for version control, you should run the following command:

$git checkout -b static-pages  Rails comes with a script for making controllers called generate; all it needs to work its magic is the controller’s name. In order to use generate with RSpec, you need to run the RSpec generator command if you didn’t run it when following the introduction to this chapter: $ rails generate rspec:install


Since we’ll be making a controller to handle static pages, we’ll call it the StaticPages controller. We’ll also plan to make actions for a Home page, a Help page, and an About page. The generate script takes an optional list of actions, so we’ll include two of the initial actions directly on the command line (Listing 3.4).

Listing 3.4. Generating a StaticPages controller.
$rails generate controller StaticPages home help --no-test-framework create app/controllers/static_pages_controller.rb route get "static_pages/help" route get "static_pages/home" invoke erb create app/views/static_pages create app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb create app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb invoke helper create app/helpers/static_pages_helper.rb invoke assets invoke coffee create app/assets/javascripts/static_pages.js.coffee invoke scss create app/assets/stylesheets/static_pages.css.scss  Here we’ve used the option --no-test-framework to suppress the generation of the default RSpec tests, which we won’t be using. Instead, we’ll create the tests by hand starting in Section 3.2. We’ve also intentionally left off the about action from the command line arguments in Listing 3.4 so that we can see how to add it using test-driven development, or TDD (Section 3.2). In Listing 3.4, note that we have passed the controller name as so-called CamelCase, which leads to the creation of a controller file written in snake case, so that a controller called StaticPages yields a file called static_pages_controller.rb. This is merely a convention, and in fact using snake case at the command line also works: the command $ rails generate controller static_pages ...


also generates a controller called static_pages_controller.rb. Because Ruby uses CamelCase for class names (Section 4.4), my preference is to refer to controllers using their CamelCase names, but this is a matter of taste. (Since Ruby filenames typically use snake case, the Rails generator converts CamelCase to snake case using the underscore method.)

By the way, if you ever make a mistake when generating code, it’s useful to know how to reverse the process. See Box 3.1 for some techniques on how to undo things in Rails.

The StaticPages controller generation in Listing 3.4 automatically updates the routes file, called config/routes.rb, which Rails uses to find the correspondence between URIs and web pages. This is our first encounter with the config directory, so it’s helpful to take a quick look at it (Figure 3.4). The config directory is where Rails collects files needed for the application configuration—hence the name.

Since we generated home and help actions, the routes file already has a rule for each one, as seen in Listing 3.5.

Listing 3.5. The routes for the home and help actions in the StaticPages controller.
config/routes.rb
SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do
get "static_pages/home"
get "static_pages/help"
.
.
.
end


Here the rule

get "static_pages/home"


maps requests for the URI /static_pages/home to the home action in the StaticPages controller. Moreover, by using get we arrange for the route to respond to a GET request, which is one of the fundamental HTTP verbs supported by the hypertext transfer protocol (Box 3.2). In our case, this means that when we generate a home action inside the StaticPages controller we automatically get a page at the address /static_pages/home. To see the results, navigate to /static_pages/home (Figure 3.5).

To understand where this page comes from, let’s start by taking a look at the StaticPages controller in a text editor; you should see something like Listing 3.6. You may note that, unlike the demo Users and Microposts controllers from Chapter 2, the StaticPages controller does not use the standard REST actions. This is normal for a collection of static pages—the REST architecture isn’t the best solution to every problem.

Listing 3.6. The StaticPages controller made by Listing 3.4.
app/controllers/static_pages_controller.rb
class StaticPagesController < ApplicationController

def home
end

def help
end
end


We see from the class keyword in Listing 3.6 that static_pages_controller.rb defines a class, in this case called StaticPagesController. Classes are simply a convenient way to organize functions (also called methods) like the home and help actions, which are defined using the def keyword. The angle bracket < indicates that StaticPagesController inherits from the Rails class ApplicationController; as we’ll see momentarily, this means that our pages come equipped with a large amount of Rails-specific functionality. (We’ll learn more about both classes and inheritance in Section 4.4.)

In the case of the StaticPages controller, both its methods are initially empty:

def home
end

def help
end


In plain Ruby, these methods would simply do nothing. In Rails, the situation is different; StaticPagesController is a Ruby class, but because it inherits from ApplicationController the behavior of its methods is specific to Rails: when visiting the URI /static_pages/home, Rails looks in the StaticPages controller and executes the code in the home action, and then renders the view (the V in MVC from Section 1.2.6) corresponding to the action. In the present case, the home action is empty, so all visiting /static_pages/home does is render the view. So, what does a view look like, and how do we find it?

If you take another look at the output in Listing 3.4, you might be able to guess the correspondence between actions and views: an action like home has a corresponding view called home.html.erb. We’ll learn in Section 3.3 what the .erb part means; from the .html part you probably won’t be surprised that it basically looks like HTML (Listing 3.7).

app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb
<h1>StaticPages#home</h1>
<p>Find me in app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb</p>


The view for the help action is analogous (Listing 3.8).

Listing 3.8. The generated view for the Help page.
app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb
<h1>StaticPages#help</h1>
<p>Find me in app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb</p>


Both of these views are just placeholders: they have a top-level heading (inside the h1 tag) and a paragraph (p tag) with the full path to the relevant file. We’ll add some (very slightly) dynamic content starting in Section 3.3, but as they stand these views underscore an important point: Rails views can simply contain static HTML. As far as the browser is concerned, the raw HTML files from Section 3.1.1 and the controller/action method of delivering pages are indistinguishable: all the browser ever sees is HTML.

In the remainder of this chapter, we’ll add some custom content to the Home and Help pages, and then add in the About page we left off in Section 3.1.2. Then we’ll add a very small amount of dynamic content by changing the title on a per-page basis.

Before moving on, if you’re using Git it’s a good idea to add the files for the StaticPages controller to the repository:

$git add .$ git commit -m "Add a StaticPages controller"


## 3.2 Our first tests

The Rails Tutorial takes an intuitive approach to testing that emphasizes the behavior of the application rather than its precise implementation, a variant of test-driven development (TDD) known as behavior-driven development (BDD). Our main tools will be integration tests (starting in this section) and unit tests (starting in Chapter 6). Integration tests, known as request specs in the context of RSpec, allow us to simulate the actions of a user interacting with our application using a web browser. Together with the natural-language syntax provided by Capybara, integration tests provide a powerful method to test our application’s functionality without having to manually check each page with a browser. (Another popular choice for BDD, called Cucumber, is introduced in Section 8.3.)

The defining quality of TDD is writing tests first, before the application code. Initially, this might take some getting used to, but the benefits are significant. By writing a failing test first and then implementing the application code to get it to pass, we increase our confidence that the test is actually covering the functionality we think it is. Moreover, the fail-implement-pass development cycle induces a flow state, leading to enjoyable coding and high productivity. Finally, the tests act as a client for the application code, often leading to more elegant software designs.

It’s important to understand that TDD is not always the right tool for the job: there’s no reason to dogmatically insist that tests always should be written first, that they should cover every single feature, or that there should necessarily be any tests at all. For example, when you aren’t at all sure how to solve a given programming problem, it’s often useful to skip the tests and write only application code, just to get a sense of what the solution will look like. (In the language of Extreme Programming (XP), this exploratory step is called a spike.) Once you see the general shape of the solution, you can then use TDD to implement a more polished version.

In this section, we’ll be running the tests using the rspec command supplied by the RSpec gem. This practice is straightforward but not ideal, and if you are a more advanced user I suggest setting up your system as described in Section 3.6.

### 3.2.1 Test-driven development

In test-driven development, we first write a failing test, represented in many testing tools by the color red. We then implement code to get the test to pass, represented by the color green. Finally, if necessary, we refactor the code, changing its form (by eliminating duplication, for example) without changing its function. This cycle is known as “Red, Green, Refactor”.

We’ll begin by adding some content to the Home page using test-driven development, including a top-level heading (<h1>) with the content Sample App. The first step is to generate an integration test (request spec) for our static pages:

$rails generate integration_test static_pages invoke rspec create spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  This creates the static_pages_spec.rb in the spec/requests directory. As with most generated code, the result is not pretty, so let’s open static_pages_spec.rb with a text editor and replace it with the contents of Listing 3.9. Listing 3.9. Code to test the contents of the Home page. spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe "Static pages" do describe "Home page" do it "should have the content 'Sample App'" do visit '/static_pages/home' page.should have_content('Sample App') end end end  The code in Listing 3.9 is pure Ruby, but even if you’ve studied Ruby before it probably won’t look very familiar. This is because RSpec uses the general malleability of Ruby to define a domain-specific language (DSL) built just for testing. The important point is that you do not need to understand RSpec’s syntax to be able to use RSpec. It may seem like magic at first, but RSpec and Capybara are designed to read more or less like English, and if you follow the examples from the generate script and the other examples in this tutorial you’ll pick it up fairly quickly. Listing 3.9 contains a describe block with one example, i.e., a block starting with it "…" do: describe "Home page" do it "should have the content 'Sample App'" do visit '/static_pages/home' page.should have_content('Sample App') end end  The first line indicates that we are describing the Home page. This is just a string, and it can be anything you want; RSpec doesn’t care, but you and other human readers probably do. Then the spec says that when you visit the Home page at /static_pages/home, the content should contain the words “Sample App”. As with the first line, what goes inside the quote marks is irrelevant to RSpec, and is intended to be descriptive to human readers. Then the line visit '/static_pages/home'  uses the Capybara function visit to simulate visiting the URI /static_pages/home in a browser, while the line page.should have_content('Sample App')  uses the page variable (also provided by Capybara) to test that the resulting page has the right content. To run the test, we have several options, including some convenient but rather advanced tools discussed in Section 3.6. For now, we’ll use the rspec command at the command line (executed with bundle exec to ensure that RSpec runs in the environment specified by our Gemfile):9 $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


This yields a failing test. The appearance of the result depends on your system; on my system, the red failing test appears as in Figure 3.6.10 (The screenshot, which predates, the current Git branching strategy, shows work on the master branch instead the static-pages branch, but this is not cause for concern.)

To get the test to pass, we’ll replace the default Home page test with the HTML in Listing 3.10.

Listing 3.10. Code to get a passing test for the Home page.
app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb
<h1>Sample App</h1>
<p>
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a>
sample application.
</p>


This arranges for a top-level heading (<h1>) with the content Sample App, which should get the test to pass. We also include an anchor tag a, which creates links to the given URI (called an “href”, or “hypertext reference”, in the context of an anchor tag):

<a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a>


Now re-run the test to see the effect:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  On my system, the passing test appears as in Figure 3.7. Based on the example for the Home page, you can probably guess the analogous test and application code for the Help page. We start by testing for the relevant content, in this case the string ’Help’ (Listing 3.11). Listing 3.11. Adding code to test the contents of the Help page. spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe "Static pages" do describe "Home page" do it "should have the content 'Sample App'" do visit '/static_pages/home' page.should have_content('Sample App') end end describe "Help page" do it "should have the content 'Help'" do visit '/static_pages/help' page.should have_content('Help') end end end  Then run the tests: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


One test should fail. (Since systems will vary, and since keeping track of how many tests there are at each stage of the tutorial is a maintenance nightmare, I’ll omit the RSpec output from now on.)

The application code (which for now is raw HTML) is similar to the code in Listing 3.10, as seen in Listing 3.12.

Listing 3.12. Code to get a passing test for the Help page.
app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb
<h1>Help</h1>
<p>
Get help on the Ruby on Rails Tutorial at the
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/help">Rails Tutorial help page</a>.
To get help on this sample app, see the
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/book">Rails Tutorial book</a>.
</p>


The tests should now pass:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  ### 3.2.2 Adding a page Having seen test-driven development in action in a simple example, we’ll use the same technique to accomplish the slightly more complicated task of adding a new page, namely, the About page that we intentionally left off in Section 3.1.2. By writing a test and running RSpec at each step, we’ll see how TDD can guide us through the development of our application code. #### Red We’ll get to the Red part of the Red-Green cycle by writing a failing test for the About page. Following the models from Listing 3.11, you can probably guess the right test (Listing 3.13). Listing 3.13. Adding code to test the contents of the About page. spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe "Static pages" do describe "Home page" do it "should have the content 'Sample App'" do visit '/static_pages/home' page.should have_content('Sample App') end end describe "Help page" do it "should have the content 'Help'" do visit '/static_pages/help' page.should have_content('Help') end end describe "About page" do it "should have the content 'About Us'" do visit '/static_pages/about' page.should have_content('About Us') end end end  #### Green Recall from Section 3.1.2 that we can generate a static page in Rails by creating an action and corresponding view with the page’s name. In our case, the About page will first need an action called about in the StaticPages controller. Having written a failing test, we can now be confident that, in getting it to pass, we will actually have created a working About page. If you run the RSpec example using $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


the output includes the following complaint:

No route matches [GET] "/static_pages/about"


This is a hint that we need to add /static_pages/about to the routes file, which we can accomplish by following the pattern in Listing 3.5, as shown in Listing 3.14.

Listing 3.14. Adding the about route.
config/routes.rb
SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do
get "static_pages/home"
get "static_pages/help"
.
.
.
end


Now running

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  complains that The action 'about' could not be found for StaticPagesController  To solve this problem, we follow the model provided by home and help from Listing 3.6 by adding an about action in the StaticPages controller (Listing 3.15). Listing 3.15. The StaticPages controller with added about action. app/controllers/static_pages_controller.rb class StaticPagesController < ApplicationController def home end def help end def about end end  Now running $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


says that we are missing a “template”, i.e., a view:

ActionView::MissingTemplate:


To solve this issue, we add the about view. This involves creating a new file called about.html.erb in the app/views/static_pages directory with the contents shown in Listing 3.16.

Listing 3.16. Code for the About page.
app/views/static_pages/about.html.erb
<h1>About Us</h1>
<p>
The <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a>
is a project to make a book and screencasts to teach web development
with <a href="http://rubyonrails.org/">Ruby on Rails</a>. This
is the sample application for the tutorial.
</p>


Running RSpec should now get us back to Green:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  Of course, it’s never a bad idea to take a look at the page in a browser to make sure our tests aren’t completely crazy (Figure 3.8). #### Refactor Now that we’ve gotten to Green, we are free to refactor our code with confidence. Oftentimes code will start to “smell”, meaning that it gets ugly, bloated, or filled with repetition. The computer doesn’t care, of course, but humans do, so it is important to keep the code base clean by refactoring frequently. Having a good test suite is an invaluable tool in this regard, as it dramatically lowers the probability of introducing bugs while refactoring. Our sample app is a little too small to refactor right now, but code smell seeps in at every crack, so we won’t have to wait long: we’ll already get busy refactoring in Section 3.3.4. ## 3.3 Slightly dynamic pages Now that we’ve created the actions and views for some static pages, we’ll make them very slightly dynamic by adding some content that changes on a per-page basis: we’ll have the title of each page change to reflect its content. Whether a changing title represents truly dynamic content is debatable, but in any case it lays the necessary foundation for unambiguously dynamic content in Chapter 7. If you skipped the TDD material in Section 3.2, be sure to create an About page at this point using the code from Listing 3.14, Listing 3.15, and Listing 3.16. ### 3.3.1 Testing a title change Our plan is to edit the Home, Help, and About pages to make page titles that change on each page. This will involve using the <title> tag in our page views. Most browsers display the contents of the title tag at the top of the browser window (Google Chrome is an odd exception), and it is also important for search-engine optimization. We’ll start by writing tests for the titles, then add the titles themselves, and then use a layout file to refactor the resulting pages and eliminate duplication. You may have noticed that the rails new command already created a layout file. We’ll learn its purpose shortly, but for now you should rename it before proceeding: $ mv app/views/layouts/application.html.erb foobar   # temporary change


(mv is a Unix command; on Windows you may need to rename the file using the file browser or the rename command.) You wouldn’t normally do this in a real application, but it’s easier to understand the purpose of the layout file if we start by disabling it.

PageURIBase titleVariable title
Home/static_pages/home"Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App""Home"
Help/static_pages/help"Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App""Help"
About/static_pages/about"Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App""About"
Table 3.1: The (mostly) static pages for the sample app.

By the end of this section, all three of our static pages will have titles of the form “Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home”, where the last part of the title will vary depending on the page (Table 3.1). We’ll build on the tests in Listing 3.13, adding title tests following the model in Listing 3.17.

Listing 3.17. A title test.
it "should have the right title" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('title',
:text => "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home")
end


This uses the have_selector method, which checks for an HTML element (the “selector”) with the given content. In other words, the code

page.should have_selector('title',
:text => "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home")


checks to see that the content inside the title tag is

"Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home"


(We’ll learn in Section 4.3.3 that the :text => "…" syntax is a hash using a symbol as the key.) It’s worth mentioning that the content need not be an exact match; any substring works as well, so that

page.should have_selector('title', :text => " | Home")


will also match the full title.

Note that in Listing 3.17 we’ve broken the material inside have_selector into two lines; this tells you something important about Ruby syntax: Ruby doesn’t care about newlines.11 The reason I chose to break the code into pieces is that I prefer to keep lines of source code under 80 characters for legibility.12 As it stands, this code formatting is still rather ugly; Section 3.5 has a refactoring exercise that makes them prettier, and Section 5.3.4 completely rewrites the StaticPages tests to take advantage of the latest features in RSpec.

Adding new tests for each of our three static pages, following the model of Listing 3.17, gives us our new StaticPages test (Listing 3.18).

Listing 3.18. The StaticPages controller spec with title tests.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'Sample App')
end

it "should have the title 'Home'" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('title',
:text => "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home")
end
end

describe "Help page" do

it "should have the h1 'Help'" do
visit '/static_pages/help'
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'Help')
end

it "should have the title 'Help'" do
visit '/static_pages/help'
page.should have_selector('title',
:text => "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Help")
end
end

it "should have the h1 'About Us'" do
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'About Us')
end

it "should have the title 'About Us'" do
page.should have_selector('title',
:text => "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | About Us")
end
end
end


Note that we’ve changed have_content to the more specific have_selector(’h1’, …). See if you can figure out why. (Hint: What would happen if the title contained, say, ‘Help’, but the content inside h1 tag had ‘Helf’ instead?)

With the tests from Listing 3.18 in place, you should run

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  to verify that our code is now Red (failing tests). ### 3.3.2 Passing title tests Now we’ll get our title tests to pass, and at the same time add the full HTML structure needed to make valid web pages. Let’s start with the Home page (Listing 3.19), using the same basic HTML skeleton as in the “hello” page from Listing 3.3. Listing 3.19. The view for the Home page with full HTML structure. app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home</title> </head> <body> <h1>Sample App</h1> <p> This is the home page for the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> sample application. </p> </body> </html>  Listing 3.19 uses the title tested for in Listing 3.18: <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Home</title>  As a result, the tests for the Home page should now pass. We’re still Red because of the failing Help and About tests, and we can get to Green with the code in Listing 3.20 and Listing 3.21. Listing 3.20. The view for the Help page with full HTML structure. app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Help</title> </head> <body> <h1>Help</h1> <p> Get help on the Ruby on Rails Tutorial at the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/help">Rails Tutorial help page</a>. To get help on this sample app, see the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/book">Rails Tutorial book</a>. </p> </body> </html>  Listing 3.21. The view for the About page with full HTML structure. app/views/static_pages/about.html.erb <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | About Us</title> </head> <body> <h1>About Us</h1> <p> The <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> is a project to make a book and screencasts to teach web development with <a href="http://rubyonrails.org/">Ruby on Rails</a>. This is the sample application for the tutorial. </p> </body> </html>  ### 3.3.3 Embedded Ruby We’ve achieved a lot already in this section, generating three valid pages using Rails controllers and actions, but they are purely static HTML and hence don’t show off the power of Rails. Moreover, they suffer from terrible duplication: • The page titles are almost (but not quite) exactly the same. • “Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App” is common to all three titles. • The entire HTML skeleton structure is repeated on each page. This repeated code is a violation of the important “Don’t Repeat Yourself” (DRY) principle; in this section and the next we’ll “DRY out our code” by removing the repetition. Paradoxically, we’ll take the first step toward eliminating duplication by first adding some more: we’ll make the titles of the pages, which are currently quite similar, match exactly. This will make it much simpler to remove all the repetition at a stroke. The technique involves using Embedded Ruby in our views. Since the Home, Help, and About page titles have a variable component, we’ll use a special Rails function called provide to set a different title on each page. We can see how this works by replacing the literal title “Home” in the home.html.erb view with the code in Listing 3.22. Listing 3.22. The view for the Home page with an Embedded Ruby title. app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'Home') %> <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title> </head> <body> <h1>Sample App</h1> <p> This is the home page for the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> sample application. </p> </body> </html>  Listing 3.22 is our first example of Embedded Ruby, also called ERb. (Now you know why HTML views have the file extension .html.erb.) ERb is the primary template system for including dynamic content in web pages.13 The code <% provide(:title, 'Home') %>  indicates using <% ... %> that Rails should call the provide function and associate the string ’Home’ with the label :title.14 Then, in the title, we use the closely related notation <%= ... %> to insert the title into the template using Ruby’s yield function:15 <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>  (The distinction between the two types of embedded Ruby is that <% ... %> executes the code inside, while <%= ... %> executes it and inserts the result into the template.) The resulting page is exactly the same as before, only now the variable part of the title is generated dynamically by ERb. We can verify that all this works by running the tests from Section 3.3.1 and see that they still pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


Then we can make the corresponding replacements for the Help and About pages (Listing 3.23 and Listing 3.24).

Listing 3.23. The view for the Help page with an Embedded Ruby title.
app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb
<% provide(:title, 'Help') %>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>
<body>
<h1>Help</h1>
<p>
Get help on the Ruby on Rails Tutorial at the
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/help">Rails Tutorial help page</a>.
To get help on this sample app, see the
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/book">Rails Tutorial book</a>.
</p>
</body>
</html>

Listing 3.24. The view for the About page with an Embedded Ruby title.
app/views/static_pages/about.html.erb
<% provide(:title, 'About Us') %>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>
<body>
<p>
The <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a>
is a project to make a book and screencasts to teach web development
with <a href="http://rubyonrails.org/">Ruby on Rails</a>. This
is the sample application for the tutorial.
</p>
</body>
</html>


### 3.3.4 Eliminating duplication with layouts

Now that we’ve replaced the variable part of the page titles with ERb, each of our pages looks something like this:

<% provide(:title, 'Foo') %>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>
<body>
Contents
</body>
</html>


In other words, all our pages are identical in structure, including the contents of the title tag, with the sole exception of the material inside the body tag.

In order to factor out this common structure, Rails comes with a special layout file called application.html.erb, which we renamed in Section 3.3.1 and which we’ll now restore:

$mv foobar app/views/layouts/application.html.erb  To get the layout to work, we have to replace the default title with the Embedded Ruby from the examples above: <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>  The resulting layout appears in Listing 3.25. Listing 3.25. The sample application site layout. app/views/layouts/application.html.erb <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title> <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all" %> <%= javascript_include_tag "application" %> <%= csrf_meta_tags %> </head> <body> <%= yield %> </body> </html>  Note here the special line <%= yield %>  This code is responsible for inserting the contents of each page into the layout. It’s not important to know exactly how this works; what matters is that using this layout ensures that, for example, visiting the page /static_pages/home converts the contents of home.html.erb to HTML and then inserts it in place of <%= yield %>. It’s also worth noting that the default Rails layout includes several additional lines: <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all" %> <%= javascript_include_tag "application" %> <%= csrf_meta_tags %>  This code arranges to include the application stylesheet and JavaScript, which are part of the asset pipeline (Section 5.2.1), together with the Rails method csrf_meta_tags, which prevents cross-site request forgery (CSRF), a type of malicious web attack. Of course, the views in Listing 3.22, Listing 3.23, and Listing 3.24 are still filled with all the HTML structure included in the layout, so we have to remove it, leaving only the interior contents. The resulting cleaned-up views appear in Listing 3.26, Listing 3.27, and Listing 3.28. Listing 3.26. The Home page with HTML structure removed. app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'Home') %> <h1>Sample App</h1> <p> This is the home page for the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> sample application. </p>  Listing 3.27. The Help page with HTML structure removed. app/views/static_pages/help.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'Help') %> <h1>Help</h1> <p> Get help on the Ruby on Rails Tutorial at the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/help">Rails Tutorial help page</a>. To get help on this sample app, see the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/book">Rails Tutorial book</a>. </p>  Listing 3.28. The About page with HTML structure removed. app/views/static_pages/about.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'About Us') %> <h1>About Us</h1> <p> The <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> is a project to make a book and screencasts to teach web development with <a href="http://rubyonrails.org/">Ruby on Rails</a>. This is the sample application for the tutorial. </p>  With these views defined, the Home, Help, and About pages are the same as before, but they have much less duplication. Verifying that the test suite still passes gives us confidence that this code refactoring was successful: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


## 3.4 Conclusion

Seen from the outside, this chapter hardly accomplished anything: we started with static pages, and ended with… mostly static pages. But appearances are deceiving: by developing in terms of Rails controllers, actions, and views, we are now in a position to add arbitrary amounts of dynamic content to our site. Seeing exactly how this plays out is the task for the rest of this tutorial.

Before moving on, let’s take a minute to commit our changes and merge them into the master branch. Back in Section 3.1.2 we created a Git branch for the development of static pages. If you haven’t been making commits as we’ve been moving along, first make a commit indicating that we’ve reached a stopping point:

$git add .$ git commit -m "Finish static pages"


Then merge the changes back into the master branch using the same technique as in Section 1.3.5:

$git checkout master$ git merge static-pages


Once you reach a stopping point like this, it’s usually a good idea to push your code up to a remote repository (which, if you followed the steps in Section 1.3.4, will be GitHub):

$git push  If you like, at this point you can even deploy the updated application to Heroku: $ git push heroku


## 3.5 Exercises

1. Make a Contact page for the sample app. Following the model in Listing 3.18, first write a test for the existence of a page at the URI /static_pages/contact by testing for the right h1 content, and then write a second test for the title “Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Contact”. Get your tests to pass, and then fill in the Contact page with the content from Listing 3.29. (This exercise is solved as part of Section 5.3.)
2. You may have noticed some repetition in the StaticPages controller spec (Listing 3.18). In particular, the base title, “Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App”, is the same for every title test. Using the RSpec let function, which creates a variable corresponding to its argument, verify that the tests in Listing 3.30 still pass. Listing 3.30 introduces string interpolation, which is covered further in Section 4.2.2.
3. (advanced) As noted on the Heroku page on using sqlite3 for development, it’s a good idea to use the same database in development, test, and production environments to minimize the possibility of subtle incompatibilities. Follow the Heroku instructions for local PostgreSQL installation to install the PostgreSQL database on your local system. Update your Gemfile to eliminate the sqlite3 gem and use the pg gem exclusively, as shown in Listing 3.31. You will also have to learn about the config/database.yml file and how to run PostgreSQL locally. (Note that for security you should add database.yml to your .gitignore file, as shown in Listing 1.7.) Your goal should be to create and configure both the development database and the test database to use PostgreSQL. Warning: You may find this exercise challenging, and I recommend it only for advanced users. If you get stuck, don’t hesitate to skip it; as noted previously, the sample application developed in this tutorial is fully compatible with both SQLite and PostgreSQL.
Listing 3.29. Code for a proposed Contact page.
app/views/static_pages/contact.html.erb
<% provide(:title, 'Contact') %>
<h1>Contact</h1>
<p>
Contact Ruby on Rails Tutorial about the sample app at the
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/contact">contact page</a>.
</p>

Listing 3.30. The StaticPages controller spec with a base title.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do

let(:base_title) { "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App" }

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'Sample App')
end

it "should have the title 'Home'" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('title', :text => "#{base_title} | Home")
end
end

describe "Help page" do

it "should have the h1 'Help'" do
visit '/static_pages/help'
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'Help')
end

it "should have the title 'Help'" do
visit '/static_pages/help'
page.should have_selector('title', :text => "#{base_title} | Help")
end
end

it "should have the h1 'About Us'" do
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'About Us')
end

it "should have the title 'About Us'" do
page.should have_selector('title', :text => "#{base_title} | About Us")
end
end

describe "Contact page" do

it "should have the h1 'Contact'" do
visit '/static_pages/contact'
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'Contact')
end

it "should have the title 'Contact'" do
visit '/static_pages/contact'
page.should have_selector('title', :text => "#{base_title} | Contact")
end
end
end

Listing 3.31. The Gemfile needed to use PostgreSQL instead of SQLite.
source 'https://rubygems.org'

gem 'rails', '3.2.14'
gem 'pg', '0.12.2'

group :development, :test do
gem 'rspec-rails', '2.11.0'
end

# Gems used only for assets and not required
# in production environments by default.
group :assets do
gem 'sass-rails',   '3.2.5'
gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2'
gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3'
end

gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2'

group :test do
gem 'capybara', '1.1.2'
end


As mentioned briefly in Section 3.2, using the rspec command directly is not ideal. In this section, we’ll first discuss a method to eliminate the necessity of typing bundle exec, and then set up testing to automate the running of the test suite using Guard (Section 3.6.2) and, optionally, Spork (Section 3.6.3). Finally, we’ll mention a method for running tests directly inside Sublime Text, a technique especially useful when used in concert with Spork.

This section should only be attempted by fairly advanced users and can be skipped without loss of continuity. Among other things, this material is likely to go out of date faster than the rest of the tutorial, so you shouldn’t expect everything on your system to match the examples exactly, and you may have to Google around to get everything to work.

### 3.6.1 Eliminating bundle exec

As mentioned briefly in Section 3.2.1, it is necessary in general to prefix commands such as rake or rspec with bundle exec so that the programs run in the exact gem environment specified by the Gemfile. (For technical reasons, the only exception to this is the rails command itself.) This practice is rather cumbersome, and in this section we discuss two ways to eliminate its necessity.

#### RVM Bundler integration

The first and preferred method is to use RVM, which includes Bundler integration as of version 1.11. You can verify that you have a sufficiently up-to-date version of RVM as follows:

$rvm get head && rvm reload$ rvm -v

rvm 1.15.6 (master)


As long as the version number is 1.11.x or greater, installed gems will automatically be executed in the proper Bundler environment, so that you can write (for example)

$rspec spec/  and omit the leading bundle exec. If this is the case, you should skip the rest of this section. If for any reason you are restricted to an earlier version of RVM, you can still eliminate bundle exec by using RVM Bundler integration16 to configure the Ruby Version Manager to include the proper executables automatically in the local environment. The steps are simple if somewhat mysterious. First, run these two commands: $ rvm get head && rvm reload
$chmod +x$rvm_path/hooks/after_cd_bundler


Then run these:

$cd ~/rails_projects/sample_app$ bundle install --without production --binstubs=./bundler_stubs


Together, these commands combine RVM and Bundler magic to ensure that commands such as rake and rspec are automatically executed in the right environment. Since these files are specific to your local setup, you should add the bundler_stubs directory to your .gitignore file (Listing 3.32).

Listing 3.32. Adding bundler_stubs to the .gitignore file.
# Ignore bundler config
/.bundle

# Ignore the default SQLite database.
/db/*.sqlite3

# Ignore all logfiles and tempfiles.
/log/*.log
/tmp

# Ignore other unneeded files.
doc/
*.swp
*~
.project
.DS_Store
bundler_stubs/


If you add another executable (such as guard in Section 3.6.2), you should re-run the bundle install command:

$bundle install --binstubs=./bundler_stubs  #### binstubs If you’re not using RVM, you can still avoid typing bundle exec. Bundler allows the creation of the associated binaries as follows: $ bundle --binstubs


(In fact, this step, with a different target directory, is also used when using RVM.) This command creates all the necessary executables in the bin/ directory of the application, so that we can now run the test suite as follows:

$bin/rspec spec/  The same goes for rake, etc.: $ bin/rake db:migrate


If you add another executable (such as guard in Section 3.6.2), you should re-run the bundle --binstubs command.

For the sake of readers who skip this section, the rest of this tutorial will err on the side of caution and explicitly use bundle exec, but of course you should feel free to use the more compact version if your system is properly configured.

### 3.6.2 Automated tests with Guard

One annoyance associated with using the rspec command is having to switch to the command line and run the tests by hand. (A second annoyance, the slow start-up time of the test suite, is addressed in Section 3.6.3.) In this section, we’ll show how to use Guard to automate the running of the tests. Guard monitors changes in the filesystem so that, for example, when we change the static_pages_spec.rb file only those tests get run. Even better, we can configure Guard so that when, say, the home.html.erb file is modified, the static_pages_spec.rb automatically runs.

First we add guard-rspec to the Gemfile (Listing 3.33).

Listing 3.33. A Gemfile for the sample app, including Guard.
source 'https://rubygems.org'

gem 'rails', '3.2.14'

group :development, :test do
gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5'
gem 'rspec-rails', '2.11.0'
gem 'guard-rspec', '1.2.1'

end

# Gems used only for assets and not required
# in production environments by default.
group :assets do
gem 'sass-rails',   '3.2.5'
gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2'
gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3'
end

gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2'

group :test do
gem 'capybara', '1.1.2'
# System-dependent gems
end

group :production do
gem 'pg', '0.12.2'
end


Then we have to replace the comment at the end of the test group with some system-dependent gems (OS X users may have to install Growl and growlnotify as well):

# Test gems on Macintosh OS X
group :test do
gem 'capybara', '1.1.2'
gem 'rb-fsevent', '0.9.1', :require => false
gem 'growl', '1.0.3'
end

# Test gems on Linux
group :test do
gem 'capybara', '1.1.2'
gem 'rb-inotify', '0.8.8'
gem 'libnotify', '0.5.9'
end

# Test gems on Windows
group :test do
gem 'capybara', '1.1.2'
gem 'rb-fchange', '0.0.5'
gem 'rb-notifu', '0.0.4'
gem 'win32console', '1.3.0'
end


We next install the gems by running bundle install:

$bundle install  Then initialize Guard so that it works with RSpec: $ bundle exec guard init rspec
Writing new Guardfile to /Users/mhartl/rails_projects/sample_app/Guardfile
rspec guard added to Guardfile, feel free to edit it


Now edit the resulting Guardfile so that Guard will run the right tests when the integration tests and views are updated (Listing 3.34).

Listing 3.34. Additions to the default Guardfile.
require 'active_support/core_ext'

guard 'rspec', :version => 2, :all_after_pass => false do
.
.
.
watch('config/routes.rb')
watch(%r{^app/controllers/(.+)_(controller)\.rb$}) do |m| ["spec/routing/#{m[1]}_routing_spec.rb", "spec/#{m[2]}s/#{m[1]}_#{m[2]}_spec.rb", "spec/acceptance/#{m[1]}_spec.rb", (m[1][/_pages/] ? "spec/requests/#{m[1]}_spec.rb" : "spec/requests/#{m[1].singularize}_pages_spec.rb")] end watch(%r{^app/views/(.+)/}) do |m| (m[1][/_pages/] ? "spec/requests/#{m[1]}_spec.rb" : "spec/requests/#{m[1].singularize}_pages_spec.rb") end . . . end  Here the line guard 'rspec', :version => 2, :all_after_pass => false do  ensures that Guard doesn’t run all the tests after a failing test passes (to speed up the Red-Green-Refactor cycle). We can now start guard as follows: $ bundle exec guard


To eliminate the need to prefix the command with bundle exec, re-follow the steps in Section 3.6.1.

By the way, if you get a Guard error complaining about the absence of a spec/routing directory, you can fix it by creating an empty one:

$mkdir spec/routing  ### 3.6.3 Speeding up tests with Spork When running bundle exec rspec, you may have noticed that it takes several seconds just to start running the tests, but once they start running they finish quickly. This is because each time RSpec runs the tests it has to reload the entire Rails environment. The Spork test server17 aims to solve this problem. Spork loads the environment once, and then maintains a pool of processes for running future tests. Spork is particularly useful when combined with Guard (Section 3.6.2). The first step is to add the spork gem dependency to the Gemfile (Listing 3.35). Listing 3.35. A Gemfile for the sample app. source 'https://rubygems.org' gem 'rails', '3.2.14' . . . group :development, :test do . . . gem 'guard-spork', '1.2.0' gem 'childprocess', '0.3.6' gem 'spork', '0.9.2' end . . .  Then install Spork using bundle install: $ bundle install


Next, bootstrap the Spork configuration:

$bundle exec spork --bootstrap  Now we need to edit the RSpec configuration file, located in spec/spec_helper.rb, so that the environment gets loaded in a prefork block, which arranges for it to be loaded only once (Listing 3.36). Listing 3.36. Adding environment loading to the Spork.prefork block. spec/spec_helper.rb require 'rubygems' require 'spork' Spork.prefork do # Loading more in this block will cause your tests to run faster. However, # if you change any configuration or code from libraries loaded here, you'll # need to restart spork for it take effect. # This file is copied to spec/ when you run 'rails generate rspec:install' ENV["RAILS_ENV"] ||= 'test' require File.expand_path("../../config/environment", __FILE__) require 'rspec/rails' require 'rspec/autorun' # Requires supporting ruby files with custom matchers and macros, etc, # in spec/support/ and its subdirectories. Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each {|f| require f} RSpec.configure do |config| # == Mock Framework # # If you prefer to use mocha, flexmock or RR, uncomment the appropriate line: # # config.mock_with :mocha # config.mock_with :flexmock # config.mock_with :rr config.mock_with :rspec # Remove this line if you're not using ActiveRecord or ActiveRecord fixtures config.fixture_path = "#{::Rails.root}/spec/fixtures" # If you're not using ActiveRecord, or you'd prefer not to run each of your # examples within a transaction, remove the following line or assign false # instead of true. config.use_transactional_fixtures = true # If true, the base class of anonymous controllers will be inferred # automatically. This will be the default behavior in future versions of # rspec-rails. config.infer_base_class_for_anonymous_controllers = false end end Spork.each_run do # This code will be run each time you run your specs. end  Before running Spork, we can get a baseline for the testing overhead by timing our test suite as follows: $ time bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
......

6 examples, 0 failures

real	0m8.633s
user	0m7.240s
sys	0m1.068s


Here the test suite takes more than seven seconds to run even though the actual tests run in under a tenth of a second. To speed this up, we can open a dedicated terminal window, navigate to the application root directory, and then start a Spork server:

$bundle exec spork Using RSpec Loading Spork.prefork block... Spork is ready and listening on 8989!  (To eliminate the need to prefix the command with bundle exec, re-follow the steps in Section 3.6.1.) In another terminal window, we can now run our test suite with the --drb (“distributed Ruby”) option and verify that the environment-loading overhead is greatly reduced: $ time bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb --drb
......

6 examples, 0 failures

real	0m2.649s
user	0m1.259s
sys	0m0.258s


It’s inconvenient to have to include the --drb option every time we run rspec, so I recommend adding it to the .rspec file in the application’s root directory, as shown in Listing 3.37.

Listing 3.37. Configuring RSpec to automatically use Spork.
.rspec
--colour
--drb


One word of advice when using Spork: after changing a file included in the prefork loading (such as routes.rb), you will have to restart the Spork server to load the new Rails environment. If your tests are failing when you think they should be passing, quit the Spork server with Ctrl-C and restart it:

$bundle exec spork Using RSpec Loading Spork.prefork block... Spork is ready and listening on 8989! ^C$ bundle exec spork


#### Guard with Spork

Spork is especially useful when used with Guard, which we can arrange as follows:

$bundle exec guard init spork  We then need to change the Guardfile as in Listing 3.38. Listing 3.38. The Guardfile updated for Spork. require 'active_support/core_ext' guard 'spork', :rspec_env => { 'RAILS_ENV' => 'test' } do watch('config/application.rb') watch('config/environment.rb') watch(%r{^config/environments/.+\.rb$})
watch(%r{^config/initializers/.+\.rb$}) watch('Gemfile') watch('Gemfile.lock') watch('spec/spec_helper.rb') watch('test/test_helper.rb') watch('spec/support/') end guard 'rspec', :version => 2, :all_after_pass => false, :cli => '--drb' do . . . end  Note that we’ve updated the arguments to guard to include :cli => --drb, which ensures that Guard uses the command-line interface (cli) to the Spork server. We’ve also added a command to watch the spec/support/ directory, which we’ll start modifying in Chapter 5. With that configuration in place, we can start Guard and Spork at the same time with the guard command: $ bundle exec guard


Guard automatically starts a Spork server, dramatically reducing the overhead each time a test gets run.

A well-configured testing environment with Guard, Spork, and (optionally) test notifications makes test-driven development positively addictive. See the Rails Tutorial screencasts18 for more information.

### 3.6.4 Tests inside Sublime Text

If you’re using Sublime Text, there is a powerful set of helper commands to run tests directly inside the editor. To get them working, follow the instructions for your platform at Sublime Text 2 Ruby Tests.19 On my platform (Macintosh OS X), I can install the commands as follows:

$cd ~/Library/Application\ Support/Sublime\ Text\ 2/Packages$ git clone https://github.com/maltize/sublime-text-2-ruby-tests.git RubyTest


You may also want to follow the setup instructions for Rails Tutorial Sublime Text at this time.20

After restarting Sublime Text, the RubyTest package supplies the following commands:

• Command-Shift-R: run a single test (if run on an it block) or group of tests (if run on a describe block)
• Command-Shift-E: run the last test(s)
• Command-Shift-T: run all the tests in current file

Because test suites can become quite slow even for relatively small projects, being able to run one test (or a small group of tests) at a time can be a huge win. Even a single test requires the same Rails environment overhead, of course, which is why these commands are perfectly complemented by Spork: running a single test eliminates the overhead of running the entire test file, while running Spork eliminates the overhead of starting the test environment. Here is the sequence I recommend:

1. Start Spork in a terminal window.
2. Write a single test or small group of tests.
3. Run Command-Shift-R to verify that the test or test group is red.
4. Write the corresponding application code.
5. Run Command-Shift-E to run the same test/group again, verifying that it’s green.
6. Repeat steps 2–5 as necessary.
7. When reaching a natural stopping point (such as before a commit), run rspec spec/ at the command line to confirm that the entire test suite is still green.

Even with the ability to run tests inside of Sublime Text, I still sometimes prefer using Guard, but at this point my bread-and-butter TDD technique is the one enumerated above.

1. The successor to Webrat, Capybara is named after the world’s largest rodent
2. In fact, you can even leave off install. The bundle command by itself is an alias for bundle install
3. As before, you may find the augmented file from Listing 1.7 to be more convenient depending on your system.
4. https://github.com/railstutorial/sample_app_2nd_ed
5. In fact, Rails ensures that requests for such files never hit the main Rails stack; they are delivered directly from the filesystem. (See The Rails 3 Way for more details.)
6. As usual, replace subl with the command for your text editor.
7. HTML changes with time; by explicitly making a doctype declaration we make it likelier that browsers will render our pages properly in the future. The extremely simple doctype <!DOCTYPE html> is characteristic of the latest HTML standard, HTML5.
8. Our method for making static pages is probably the simplest, but it’s not the only way. The optimal method really depends on your needs; if you expect a large number of static pages, using a StaticPages controller can get quite cumbersome, but in our sample app we’ll only need a few. See this blog post on simple pages at has_many :through for a survey of techniques for making static pages with Rails. Warning: The discussion is fairly advanced, so you might want to wait a while before trying to understand it.
9. Running bundle exec every time is rather cumbersome; see Section 3.6 for some options to eliminate it.
10. I actually use a dark background for both my terminal and editor, but the light background looks better in the screenshots.
11. A newline is what comes at the end of a line, thereby starting a new line. In code, it is represented by the character \n
12. Actually counting columns could drive you crazy, which is why many text editors have a visual aid to help you. For example, if you take a look back at Figure 1.1, you’ll see a small vertical line on the right to help keep code under 80 characters. (It’s actually at 78 columns, which gives you a little margin for error.) If you use TextMate, you can find this feature under View > Wrap Column > 78. In Sublime Text, you can use View > Ruler > 78 or View > Ruler > 80
13. There is a second popular template system called Haml, which I personally love, but it’s not quite standard enough yet for use in an introductory tutorial.
14. Experienced Rails developers might have expected the use of content_for at this point, but it doesn’t work well with the asset pipeline. The provide function is its replacement.
15. If you’ve studied Ruby before, you might suspect that Rails is yielding the contents to a block, and your suspicion would be correct. But you don’t need to know this to develop applications with Rails.
16. http://rvm.io/integration/bundler/
17. A spork is a combination spoon-fork. The project’s name is a pun on Spork’s use of POSIX forks
18. http://railstutorial.org/screencasts
19. https://github.com/maltize/sublime-text-2-ruby-tests
20. https://github.com/mhartl/rails_tutorial_sublime_text

# Chapter 4 Rails-flavored Ruby

Grounded in examples from Chapter 3, this chapter explores some elements of Ruby important for Rails. Ruby is a big language, but fortunately the subset needed to be productive as a Rails developer is relatively small. Moreover, this subset is different from the usual approaches to learning Ruby, which is why, if your goal is making dynamic web applications, I recommend learning Rails first, picking up bits of Ruby along the way. To become a Rails expert, you need to understand Ruby more deeply, and this book gives you a good foundation for developing that expertise. As noted in Section 1.1.1, after finishing the Rails Tutorial I suggest reading a pure Ruby book such as Beginning Ruby, The Well-Grounded Rubyist, or The Ruby Way.

This chapter covers a lot of material, and it’s OK not to get it all on the first pass. I’ll refer back to it frequently in future chapters.

## 4.1 Motivation

As we saw in the last chapter, it’s possible to develop the skeleton of a Rails application, and even start testing it, with essentially no knowledge of the underlying Ruby language. We did this by relying on the test code provided by the tutorial and addressing each error message until the test suite was passing. This situation can’t last forever, though, and we’ll open this chapter with an addition to the site that brings us face-to-face with our Ruby limitations.

When we last saw our new application, we had just updated our mostly static pages to use Rails layouts to eliminate duplication in our views (Listing 4.1).

Listing 4.1. The sample application site layout.
app/views/layouts/application.html.erb
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>
<%= stylesheet_link_tag    "application", :media => "all" %>
<%= javascript_include_tag "application" %>
<%= csrf_meta_tags %>
<body>
<%= yield %>
</body>
</html>


Let’s focus on one particular line in Listing 4.1:

<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all" %>


This uses the built-in Rails function stylesheet_link_tag (which you can read more about at the Rails API) to include application.css for all media types (including computer screens and printers). To an experienced Rails developer, this line looks simple, but there are at least four potentially confusing Ruby ideas: built-in Rails methods, method invocation with missing parentheses, symbols, and hashes. We’ll cover all of these ideas in this chapter.

In addition to coming equipped with a large number of built-in functions for use in the views, Rails also allows the creation of new ones. Such functions are called helpers; to see how to make a custom helper, let’s start by examining the title line from Listing 4.1:

Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %>


This relies on the definition of a page title (using provide) in each view, as in

<% provide(:title, 'Home') %>
<h1>Sample App</h1>
<p>
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a>
sample application.
</p>


But what if we don’t provide a title? It’s a good convention to have a base title we use on every page, with an optional page title if we want to be more specific. We’ve almost achieved that with our current layout, with one wrinkle: as you can see if you delete the provide call in one of the views, in the absence of a page-specific title the full title appears as follows:

Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App |


In other words, there’s a suitable base title, but there’s also a trailing vertical bar character | at the end.

To solve the problem of a missing page title, we’ll define a custom helper called full_title. The full_title helper returns a base title, “Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App”, if no page title is defined, and adds a vertical bar followed by the page title if one is defined (Listing 4.2).1

Listing 4.2. Defining a full_title helper.
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
module ApplicationHelper

# Returns the full title on a per-page basis.
def full_title(page_title)
base_title = "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App"
if page_title.empty?
base_title
else
"#{base_title} | #{page_title}"
end
end
end


Now that we have a helper, we can use it to simplify our layout by replacing

<title>Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | <%= yield(:title) %></title>


with

<title><%= full_title(yield(:title)) %></title>


as seen in Listing 4.3.

Listing 4.3. The sample application site layout.
app/views/layouts/application.html.erb
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title><%= full_title(yield(:title)) %></title>
<%= stylesheet_link_tag    "application", :media => "all" %>
<%= javascript_include_tag "application" %>
<%= csrf_meta_tags %>
<body>
<%= yield %>
</body>
</html>


To put our helper to work, we can eliminate the unnecessary word “Home” from the Home page, allowing it to revert to the base title. We do this by first updating our test with the code in Listing 4.4, which updates the previous title test and adds one to test for the absence of the custom ’Home’ string in the title.

spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('h1', :text => 'Sample App')
end

it "should have the base title" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should have_selector('title',
:text => "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App")
end

it "should not have a custom page title" do
visit '/static_pages/home'
page.should_not have_selector('title', :text => '| Home')
end
end
.
.
.
end


See if you can figure out why we’ve added a new test instead of just altering the current one. (Hint: The answer is in Section 3.3.1.)

Let’s run the test suite to verify that one test fails:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  To get the test suite to pass, we’ll remove the provide line from the Home page’s view, as seen in Listing 4.5. Listing 4.5. The Home page with no custom page title. app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb <h1>Sample App</h1> <p> This is the home page for the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> sample application. </p>  At this point the tests should pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


As with the line to include the application stylesheet, the code in Listing 4.2 may look simple to the eyes of an experienced Rails developer, but it’s full of potentially confusing Ruby ideas: modules, comments, local variable assignment, booleans, control flow, string interpolation, and return values. This chapter will cover all of these ideas as well.

## 4.2 Strings and methods

Our principal tool for learning Ruby will be the Rails console, a command-line tool for interacting with Rails applications first seen in Section 2.3.3. The console itself is built on top of interactive Ruby (irb), and thus has access to the full power of the Ruby language. (As we’ll see in Section 4.4.4, the console also has access to the Rails environment.) Start the console at the command line as follows:

$rails console Loading development environment >>  By default, the console starts in a development environment, which is one of three separate environments defined by Rails (the others are test and production). This distinction won’t be important in this chapter, but we’ll learn more about environments in Section 7.1.1. The console is a great learning tool, and you should feel free to explore—don’t worry, you (probably) won’t break anything. When using the console, type Ctrl-C if you get stuck, or Ctrl-D to exit the console altogether. Throughout the rest of this chapter, you might find it helpful to consult the Ruby API. It’s packed (perhaps even too packed) with information; for example, to learn more about Ruby strings you can look at the Ruby API entry for the String class. ### 4.2.1 Comments Ruby comments start with the pound sign # (also called the “hash mark” or, more poetically, the “octothorpe”) and extend to the end of the line. Ruby ignores comments, but they are useful for human readers (including, often, the original author!). In the code  # Returns the full title on a per-page basis. def full_title(page_title) . . . end  the first line is a comment indicating the purpose of the subsequent function definition. You don’t ordinarily include comments in console sessions, but for instructional purposes I’ll include some comments in what follows, like this: $ rails console
>> 17 + 42   # Integer addition
=> 59


If you follow along in this section typing or copying-and-pasting commands into your own console, you can of course omit the comments if you like; the console will ignore them in any case.

### 4.2.2 Strings

Strings are probably the most important data structure for web applications, since web pages ultimately consist of strings of characters sent from the server to the browser. Let’s start exploring strings with the console, this time started with rails c, which is a shortcut for rails console:

$rails c >> "" # An empty string => "" >> "foo" # A nonempty string => "foo"  These are string literals (also, amusingly, called literal strings), created using the double quote character ". The console prints the result of evaluating each line, which in the case of a string literal is just the string itself. We can also concatenate strings with the + operator: >> "foo" + "bar" # String concatenation => "foobar"  Here the result of evaluating "foo" plus "bar" is the string "foobar".2 Another way to build up strings is via interpolation using the special syntax #{}:3 >> first_name = "Michael" # Variable assignment => "Michael" >> "#{first_name} Hartl" # String interpolation => "Michael Hartl"  Here we’ve assigned the value "Michael" to the variable first_name and then interpolated it into the string "#{first_name} Hartl". We could also assign both strings a variable name: >> first_name = "Michael" => "Michael" >> last_name = "Hartl" => "Hartl" >> first_name + " " + last_name # Concatenation, with a space in between => "Michael Hartl" >> "#{first_name} #{last_name}" # The equivalent interpolation => "Michael Hartl"  Note that the final two expressions are equivalent, but I prefer the interpolated version; having to add the single space " " seems a bit awkward. #### Printing To print a string, the most commonly used Ruby function is puts (pronounced “put ess”, for “put string”): >> puts "foo" # put string foo => nil  The puts method operates as a side-effect: the expression puts "foo" prints the string to the screen and then returns literally nothing: nil is a special Ruby value for “nothing at all”. (In what follows, I’ll sometimes suppress the => nil part for simplicity.) Using puts automatically appends a newline character \n to the output; the related print method does not: >> print "foo" # print string (same as puts, but without the newline) foo=> nil >> print "foo\n" # Same as puts "foo" foo => nil  #### Single-quoted strings All the examples so far have used double-quoted strings, but Ruby also supports single-quoted strings. For many uses, the two types of strings are effectively identical: >> 'foo' # A single-quoted string => "foo" >> 'foo' + 'bar' => "foobar"  There’s an important difference, though; Ruby won’t interpolate into single-quoted strings: >> '#{foo} bar' # Single-quoted strings don't allow interpolation => "\#{foo} bar"  Note how the console returns values using double-quoted strings, which requires a backslash to escape special characters such as #. If double-quoted strings can do everything that single-quoted strings can do, and interpolate to boot, what’s the point of single-quoted strings? They are often useful because they are truly literal, and contain exactly the characters you type. For example, the “backslash” character is special on most systems, as in the literal newline \n. If you want a variable to contain a literal backslash, single quotes make it easier: >> '\n' # A literal 'backslash n' combination => "\\n"  As with the # character in our previous example, Ruby needs to escape the backslash with an additional backslash; inside double-quoted strings, a literal backslash is represented with two backslashes. For a small example like this, there’s not much savings, but if there are lots of things to escape it can be a real help: >> 'Newlines (\n) and tabs (\t) both use the backslash character \.' => "Newlines (\\n) and tabs (\\t) both use the backslash character \\."  ### 4.2.3 Objects and message passing Everything in Ruby, including strings and even nil, is an object. We’ll see the technical meaning of this in Section 4.4.2, but I don’t think anyone ever understood objects by reading the definition in a book; you have to build up your intuition for objects by seeing lots of examples. It’s easier to describe what objects do, which is respond to messages. An object like a string, for example, can respond to the message length, which returns the number of characters in the string: >> "foobar".length # Passing the "length" message to a string => 6  Typically, the messages that get passed to objects are methods, which are functions defined on those objects.4 Strings also respond to the empty? method: >> "foobar".empty? => false >> "".empty? => true  Note the question mark at the end of the empty? method. This is a Ruby convention indicating that the return value is boolean: true or false. Booleans are especially useful for control flow: >> s = "foobar" >> if s.empty? >> "The string is empty" >> else >> "The string is nonempty" >> end => "The string is nonempty"  Booleans can also be combined using the && (“and”), || (“or”), and ! (“not”) operators: >> x = "foo" => "foo" >> y = "" => "" >> puts "Both strings are empty" if x.empty? && y.empty? => nil >> puts "One of the strings is empty" if x.empty? || y.empty? "One of the strings is empty" => nil >> puts "x is not empty" if !x.empty? "x is not empty" => nil  Since everything in Ruby is an object, it follows that nil is an object, so it too can respond to methods. One example is the to_s method that can convert virtually any object to a string: >> nil.to_s => ""  This certainly appears to be an empty string, as we can verify by chaining the messages we pass to nil: >> nil.empty? NoMethodError: You have a nil object when you didn't expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occurred while evaluating nil.empty? >> nil.to_s.empty? # Message chaining => true  We see here that the nil object doesn’t itself respond to the empty? method, but nil.to_s does. There’s a special method for testing for nil-ness, which you might be able to guess: >> "foo".nil? => false >> "".nil? => false >> nil.nil? => true  The code puts "x is not empty" if !x.empty?  also shows an alternate use of the if keyword: Ruby allows you to write a statement that is evaluated only if the statement following if is true. There’s a complementary unless keyword that works the same way: >> string = "foobar" >> puts "The string '#{string}' is nonempty." unless string.empty? The string 'foobar' is nonempty. => nil  It’s worth noting that the nil object is special, in that it is the only Ruby object that is false in a boolean context, apart from false itself: >> if nil >> true >> else >> false # nil is false >> end => false  In particular, all other Ruby objects are true, even 0: >> if 0 >> true # 0 (and everything other than nil and false itself) is true >> else >> false >> end => true  ### 4.2.4 Method definitions The console allows us to define methods the same way we did with the home action from Listing 3.6 or the full_title helper from Listing 4.2. (Defining methods in the console is a bit cumbersome, and ordinarily you would use a file, but it’s convenient for demonstration purposes.) For example, let’s define a function string_message that takes a single argument and returns a message based on whether the argument is empty or not: >> def string_message(string) >> if string.empty? >> "It's an empty string!" >> else >> "The string is nonempty." >> end >> end => nil >> puts string_message("") It's an empty string! >> puts string_message("foobar") The string is nonempty.  Note that Ruby functions have an implicit return, meaning they return the last statement evaluated—in this case, one of the two message strings, depending on whether the method’s argument string is empty or not. Ruby also has an explicit return option; the following function is equivalent to the one above: >> def string_message(string) >> return "It's an empty string!" if string.empty? >> return "The string is nonempty." >> end  The alert reader might notice at this point that the second return here is actually unnecessary—being the last expression in the function, the string "The string is nonempty." will be returned regardless of the return keyword, but using return in both places has a pleasing symmetry to it. ### 4.2.5 Back to the title helper We are now in a position to understand the full_title helper from Listing 4.2:5 module ApplicationHelper # Returns the full title on a per-page basis. # Documentation comment def full_title(page_title) # Method definition base_title = "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App" # Variable assignment if page_title.empty? # Boolean test base_title # Implicit return else "#{base_title} | #{page_title}" # String interpolation end end end  These elements—function definition, variable assignment, boolean tests, control flow, and string interpolation—come together to make a compact helper method for use in our site layout. The final element is module ApplicationHelper: modules give us a way to package together related methods, which can then be mixed in to Ruby classes using include. When writing ordinary Ruby, you often write modules and include them explicitly yourself, but in the case of a helper module Rails handles the inclusion for us. The result is that the full_title method is automagically available in all our views. ## 4.3 Other data structures Although web apps are ultimately about strings, actually making those strings requires using other data structures as well. In this section, we’ll learn about some Ruby data structures important for writing Rails applications. ### 4.3.1 Arrays and ranges An array is just a list of elements in a particular order. We haven’t discussed arrays yet in the Rails Tutorial, but understanding them gives a good foundation for understanding hashes (Section 4.3.3) and for aspects of Rails data modeling (such as the has_many association seen in Section 2.3.3 and covered more in Section 10.1.3). So far we’ve spent a lot of time understanding strings, and there’s a natural way to get from strings to arrays using the split method: >> "foo bar baz".split # Split a string into a three-element array => ["foo", "bar", "baz"]  The result of this operation is an array of three strings. By default, split divides a string into an array by splitting on whitespace, but you can split on nearly anything else as well: >> "fooxbarxbazx".split('x') => ["foo", "bar", "baz"]  As is conventional in most computer languages, Ruby arrays are zero-offset, which means that the first element in the array has index 0, the second has index 1, and so on: >> a = [42, 8, 17] => [42, 8, 17] >> a[0] # Ruby uses square brackets for array access. => 42 >> a[1] => 8 >> a[2] => 17 >> a[-1] # Indices can even be negative! => 17  We see here that Ruby uses square brackets to access array elements. In addition to this bracket notation, Ruby offers synonyms for some commonly accessed elements:6 >> a # Just a reminder of what 'a' is => [42, 8, 17] >> a.first => 42 >> a.second => 8 >> a.last => 17 >> a.last == a[-1] # Comparison using == => true  This last line introduces the equality comparison operator ==, which Ruby shares with many other languages, along with the associated != (“not equal”), etc.: >> x = a.length # Like strings, arrays respond to the 'length' method. => 3 >> x == 3 => true >> x == 1 => false >> x != 1 => true >> x >= 1 => true >> x < 1 => false  In addition to length (seen in the first line above), arrays respond to a wealth of other methods: >> a => [42, 8, 17] >> a.sort => [8, 17, 42] >> a.reverse => [17, 8, 42] >> a.shuffle => [17, 42, 8] >> a => [42, 8, 17]  Note that none of the methods above changes a itself. To mutate the array, use the corresponding “bang” methods (so-called because the exclamation point is usually pronounced “bang” in this context): >> a => [42, 8, 17] >> a.sort! => [8, 17, 42] >> a => [8, 17, 42]  You can also add to arrays with the push method or its equivalent operator, <<: >> a.push(6) # Pushing 6 onto an array => [42, 8, 17, 6] >> a << 7 # Pushing 7 onto an array => [42, 8, 17, 6, 7] >> a << "foo" << "bar" # Chaining array pushes => [42, 8, 17, 6, 7, "foo", "bar"]  This last example shows that you can chain pushes together, and also that, unlike arrays in many other languages, Ruby arrays can contain a mixture of different types (in this case, integers and strings). Before we saw split convert a string to an array. We can also go the other way with the join method: >> a => [42, 8, 17, 7, "foo", "bar"] >> a.join # Join on nothing => "428177foobar" >> a.join(', ') # Join on comma-space => "42, 8, 17, 7, foo, bar"  Closely related to arrays are ranges, which can probably most easily be understood by converting them to arrays using the to_a method: >> 0..9 => 0..9 >> 0..9.to_a # Oops, call to_a on 9 NoMethodError: undefined method to_a' for 9:Fixnum >> (0..9).to_a # Use parentheses to call to_a on the range => [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]  Though 0..9 is a valid range, the second expression above shows that we need to add parentheses to call a method on it. Ranges are useful for pulling out array elements: >> a = %w[foo bar baz quux] # Use %w to make a string array. => ["foo", "bar", "baz", "quux"] >> a[0..2] => ["foo", "bar", "baz"]  Ranges also work with characters: >> ('a'..'e').to_a => ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]  ### 4.3.2 Blocks Both arrays and ranges respond to a host of methods that accept blocks, which are simultaneously one of Ruby’s most powerful and most confusing features: >> (1..5).each { |i| puts 2 * i } 2 4 6 8 10 => 1..5  This code calls the each method on the range (1..5) and passes it the block { |i| puts 2 * i }. The vertical bars around the variable name in |i| are Ruby syntax for a block variable, and it’s up to the method to know what to do with the block. In this case, the range’s each method can handle a block with a single local variable, which we’ve called i, and it just executes the block for each value in the range. Curly braces are one way to indicate a block, but there is a second way as well: >> (1..5).each do |i| ?> puts 2 * i >> end 2 4 6 8 10 => 1..5  Blocks can be more than one line, and often are. In the Rails Tutorial we’ll follow the common convention of using curly braces only for short one-line blocks and the do..end syntax for longer one-liners and for multi-line blocks: >> (1..5).each do |number| ?> puts 2 * number >> puts '--' >> end 2 -- 4 -- 6 -- 8 -- 10 -- => 1..5  Here I’ve used number in place of i just to emphasize that any variable name will do. Unless you already have a substantial programming background, there is no shortcut to understanding blocks; you just have to see them a lot, and eventually you’ll get used to them.7 Luckily, humans are quite good at making generalizations from concrete examples; here are a few more, including a couple using the map method: >> 3.times { puts "Betelgeuse!" } # 3.times takes a block with no variables. "Betelgeuse!" "Betelgeuse!" "Betelgeuse!" => 3 >> (1..5).map { |i| i**2 } # The ** notation is for 'power'. => [1, 4, 9, 16, 25] >> %w[a b c] # Recall that %w makes string arrays. => ["a", "b", "c"] >> %w[a b c].map { |char| char.upcase } => ["A", "B", "C"] >> %w[A B C].map { |char| char.downcase } => ["a", "b", "c"]  As you can see, the map method returns the result of applying the given block to each element in the array or range. By the way, we’re now in a position to understand the line of Ruby I threw into Section 1.4.4 to generate random subdomains: ('a'..'z').to_a.shuffle[0..7].join  Let’s build it up step-by-step: >> ('a'..'z').to_a # An alphabet array => ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"] >> ('a'..'z').to_a.shuffle # Shuffle it. => ["c", "g", "l", "k", "h", "z", "s", "i", "n", "d", "y", "u", "t", "j", "q", "b", "r", "o", "f", "e", "w", "v", "m", "a", "x", "p"] >> ('a'..'z').to_a.shuffle[0..7] # Pull out the first eight elements. => ["f", "w", "i", "a", "h", "p", "c", "x"] >> ('a'..'z').to_a.shuffle[0..7].join # Join them together to make one string. => "mznpybuj"  ### 4.3.3 Hashes and symbols Hashes are essentially a generalization of arrays: you can think of hashes as basically like arrays, but not limited to integer indices. (In fact, some languages, especially Perl, sometimes call hashes associative arrays for this reason.) Instead, hash indices, or keys, can be almost any object. For example, we can use strings as keys: >> user = {} # {} is an empty hash. => {} >> user["first_name"] = "Michael" # Key "first_name", value "Michael" => "Michael" >> user["last_name"] = "Hartl" # Key "last_name", value "Hartl" => "Hartl" >> user["first_name"] # Element access is like arrays. => "Michael" >> user # A literal representation of the hash => {"last_name"=>"Hartl", "first_name"=>"Michael"}  Hashes are indicated with curly braces containing key-value pairs; a pair of braces with no key-value pairs—i.e., {}—is an empty hash. It’s important to note that the curly braces for hashes have nothing to do with the curly braces for blocks. (Yes, this can be confusing.) Although hashes resemble arrays, one important difference is that hashes don’t generally guarantee keeping their elements in a particular order.8 If order matters, use an array. Instead of defining hashes one item at a time using square brackets, it’s easy to use a literal representation with keys and values separated by =>, called a “hashrocket”: >> user = { "first_name" => "Michael", "last_name" => "Hartl" } => {"last_name"=>"Hartl", "first_name"=>"Michael"}  Here I’ve used the usual Ruby convention of putting an extra space at the two ends of the hash—a convention ignored by the console output. (Don’t ask me why the spaces are conventional; probably some early influential Ruby programmer liked the look of the extra spaces, and the convention stuck.) So far we’ve used strings as hash keys, but in Rails it is much more common to use symbols instead. Symbols look kind of like strings, but prefixed with a colon instead of surrounded by quotes. For example, :name is a symbol. You can think of symbols as basically strings without all the extra baggage:9 >> "name".split('') => ["n", "a", "m", "e"] >> :name.split('') NoMethodError: undefined method split' for :name:Symbol >> "foobar".reverse => "raboof" >> :foobar.reverse NoMethodError: undefined method reverse' for :foobar:Symbol  Symbols are a special Ruby data type shared with very few other languages, so they may seem weird at first, but Rails uses them a lot, so you’ll get used to them fast. In terms of symbols as hash keys, we can define a user hash as follows: >> user = { :name => "Michael Hartl", :email => "michael@example.com" } => {:name=>"Michael Hartl", :email=>"michael@example.com"} >> user[:name] # Access the value corresponding to :name. => "Michael Hartl" >> user[:password] # Access the value of an undefined key. => nil  We see here from the last example that the hash value for an undefined key is simply nil. Since it’s so common for hashes to use symbols as keys, Ruby 1.9 supports a new syntax just for this special case: >> h1 = { :name => "Michael Hartl", :email => "michael@example.com" } => {:name=>"Michael Hartl", :email=>"michael@example.com"} >> h2 = { name: "Michael Hartl", email: "michael@example.com" } => {:name=>"Michael Hartl", :email=>"michael@example.com"} >> h1 == h2 => true  The second syntax replaces the symbol/hashrocket combination with the name of the key followed by a colon and a value: { name: "Michael Hartl", email: "michael@example.com" }  This construction more closely follows the hash notation in other languages (such as JavaScript) and enjoys growing popularity in the Rails community. Both syntaxes are still in common use, so it’s essential to be able to recognize them. Most hashes in the rest of this book use the new notation, which won’t work with Ruby 1.8.7 or earlier; if you are using an earlier version of Ruby, you will either have to upgrade to Ruby 1.9 (recommended) or use the old hash notation. Hash values can be virtually anything, even other hashes, as seen in Listing 4.6. Listing 4.6. Nested hashes. >> params = {} # Define a hash called 'params' (short for 'parameters'). => {} >> params[:user] = { name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com" } => {:name=>"Michael Hartl", :email=>"mhartl@example.com"} >> params => {:user=>{:name=>"Michael Hartl", :email=>"mhartl@example.com"}} >> params[:user][:email] => "mhartl@example.com"  These sorts of hashes-of-hashes, or nested hashes, are heavily used by Rails, as we’ll see starting in Section 7.3. As with arrays and ranges, hashes respond to the each method. For example, consider a hash named flash with keys for two conditions, :success and :error: >> flash = { success: "It worked!", error: "It failed." } => {:success=>"It worked!", :error=>"It failed."} >> flash.each do |key, value| ?> puts "Key #{key.inspect} has value #{value.inspect}" >> end Key :success has value "It worked!" Key :error has value "It failed."  Note that, while the each method for arrays takes a block with only one variable, each for hashes takes two, a key and a value. Thus, the each method for a hash iterates through the hash one key-value pair at a time. The last example uses the useful inspect method, which returns a string with a literal representation of the object it’s called on: >> puts (1..5).to_a # Put an array as a string. 1 2 3 4 5 >> puts (1..5).to_a.inspect # Put a literal array. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] >> puts :name, :name.inspect name :name >> puts "It worked!", "It worked!".inspect It worked! "It worked!"  By the way, using inspect to print an object is common enough that there’s a shortcut for it, the p function: >> p :name # Same as 'puts :name.inspect' :name  ### 4.3.4 CSS revisited It’s time now to revisit the line from Listing 4.1 used in the layout to include the cascading style sheets: <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all" %>  We are now nearly in a position to understand this. As mentioned briefly in Section 4.1, Rails defines a special function to include stylesheets, and stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all"  is a call to this function. But there are two mysteries. First, where are the parentheses? In Ruby, they are optional; these two lines are equivalent: # Parentheses on function calls are optional. stylesheet_link_tag("application", :media => "all") stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all"  Second, the :media argument sure looks like a hash, but where are the curly braces? When hashes are the last argument in a function call, the curly braces are optional; these two lines are equivalent: # Curly braces on final hash arguments are optional. stylesheet_link_tag "application", { :media => "all" } stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all"  So, we see now that the line stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all"  calls the stylesheet_link_tag function with two arguments: a string, indicating the path to the stylesheet, and a hash, indicating the media type. Because of the <%= %> brackets, the results are inserted into the template by ERb, and if you view the source of the page in your browser you should see the HTML needed to include a stylesheet (Listing 4.7). (You may see some extra things, like ?body=1, after the CSS filenames. These are inserted by Rails to ensure that browsers reload the CSS when it changes on the server.) Listing 4.7. The HTML source produced by the CSS includes. <link href="/assets/application.css" media="all" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />  If you actually view the CSS file by navigating to http://localhost:3000/assets/application.css, you’ll see that (apart from some comments) it is empty. We’ll set about changing this in Chapter 5. ## 4.4 Ruby classes We’ve said before that everything in Ruby is an object, and in this section we’ll finally get to define some of our own. Ruby, like many object-oriented languages, uses classes to organize methods; these classes are then instantiated to create objects. If you’re new to object-oriented programming, this may sound like gibberish, so let’s look at some concrete examples. ### 4.4.1 Constructors We’ve seen lots of examples of using classes to instantiate objects, but we have yet to do so explicitly. For example, we instantiated a string using the double quote characters, which is a literal constructor for strings: >> s = "foobar" # A literal constructor for strings using double quotes => "foobar" >> s.class => String  We see here that strings respond to the method class, and simply return the class they belong to. Instead of using a literal constructor, we can use the equivalent named constructor, which involves calling the new method on the class name:10 >> s = String.new("foobar") # A named constructor for a string => "foobar" >> s.class => String >> s == "foobar" => true  This is equivalent to the literal constructor, but it’s more explicit about what we’re doing. Arrays work the same way as strings: >> a = Array.new([1, 3, 2]) => [1, 3, 2]  Hashes, in contrast, are different. While the array constructor Array.new takes an initial value for the array, Hash.new takes a default value for the hash, which is the value of the hash for a nonexistent key: >> h = Hash.new => {} >> h[:foo] # Try to access the value for the nonexistent key :foo. => nil >> h = Hash.new(0) # Arrange for nonexistent keys to return 0 instead of nil. => {} >> h[:foo] => 0  When a method gets called on the class itself, as in the case of new, it’s called a class method. The result of calling new on a class is an object of that class, also called an instance of the class. A method called on an instance, such as length, is called an instance method. ### 4.4.2 Class inheritance When learning about classes, it’s useful to find out the class hierarchy using the superclass method: >> s = String.new("foobar") => "foobar" >> s.class # Find the class of s. => String >> s.class.superclass # Find the superclass of String. => Object >> s.class.superclass.superclass # Ruby 1.9 uses a new BasicObject base class => BasicObject >> s.class.superclass.superclass.superclass => nil  A diagram of this inheritance hierarchy appears in Figure 4.1. We see here that the superclass of String is Object and the superclass of Object is BasicObject, but BasicObject has no superclass. This pattern is true of every Ruby object: trace back the class hierarchy far enough and every class in Ruby ultimately inherits from BasicObject, which has no superclass itself. This is the technical meaning of “everything in Ruby is an object”. To understand classes a little more deeply, there’s no substitute for making one of our own. Let’s make a Word class with a palindrome? method that returns true if the word is the same spelled forward and backward: >> class Word >> def palindrome?(string) >> string == string.reverse >> end >> end => nil  We can use it as follows: >> w = Word.new # Make a new Word object. => #<Word:0x22d0b20> >> w.palindrome?("foobar") => false >> w.palindrome?("level") => true  If this example strikes you as a bit contrived, good; this is by design. It’s odd to create a new class just to create a method that takes a string as an argument. Since a word is a string, it’s more natural to have our Word class inherit from String, as seen in Listing 4.8. (You should exit the console and re-enter it to clear out the old definition of Word.) Listing 4.8. Defining a Word class in the console. >> class Word < String # Word inherits from String. >> # Returns true if the string is its own reverse. >> def palindrome? >> self == self.reverse # self is the string itself. >> end >> end => nil  Here Word < String is the Ruby syntax for inheritance (discussed briefly in Section 3.1.2), which ensures that, in addition to the new palindrome? method, words also have all the same methods as strings: >> s = Word.new("level") # Make a new Word, initialized with "level". => "level" >> s.palindrome? # Words have the palindrome? method. => true >> s.length # Words also inherit all the normal string methods. => 5  Since the Word class inherits from String, we can use the console to see the class hierarchy explicitly: >> s.class => Word >> s.class.superclass => String >> s.class.superclass.superclass => Object  This hierarchy is illustrated in Figure 4.2. In Listing 4.8, note that checking that the word is its own reverse involves accessing the word inside the Word class. Ruby allows us to do this using the self keyword: inside the Word class, self is the object itself, which means we can use self == self.reverse  to check if the word is a palindrome.11 ### 4.4.3 Modifying built-in classes While inheritance is a powerful idea, in the case of palindromes it might be even more natural to add the palindrome? method to the String class itself, so that (among other things) we can call palindrome? on a string literal, which we currently can’t do: >> "level".palindrome? NoMethodError: undefined method palindrome?' for "level":String  Amazingly, Ruby lets you do just this; Ruby classes can be opened and modified, allowing ordinary mortals such as ourselves to add methods to them:12 >> class String >> # Returns true if the string is its own reverse. >> def palindrome? >> self == self.reverse >> end >> end => nil >> "deified".palindrome? => true  (I don’t know which is cooler: that Ruby lets you add methods to built-in classes, or that "deified" is a palindrome.) Modifying built-in classes is a powerful technique, but with great power comes great responsibility, and it’s considered bad form to add methods to built-in classes without having a really good reason for doing so. Rails does have some good reasons; for example, in web applications we often want to prevent variables from being blank—e.g., a user’s name should be something other than spaces and other whitespace—so Rails adds a blank? method to Ruby. Since the Rails console automatically includes the Rails extensions, we can see an example here (this won’t work in plain irb): >> "".blank? => true >> " ".empty? => false >> " ".blank? => true >> nil.blank? => true  We see that a string of spaces is not empty, but it is blank. Note also that nil is blank; since nil isn’t a string, this is a hint that Rails actually adds blank? to String’s base class, which (as we saw at the beginning of this section) is Object itself. We’ll see some other examples of Rails additions to Ruby classes in Section 8.2.1. ### 4.4.4 A controller class All this talk about classes and inheritance may have triggered a flash of recognition, because we have seen both before, in the StaticPages controller (Listing 3.15): class StaticPagesController < ApplicationController def home end def help end def about end end  You’re now in a position to appreciate, at least vaguely, what this code means: StaticPagesController is a class that inherits from ApplicationController, and comes equipped with home, help, and about methods. Since each Rails console session loads the local Rails environment, we can even create a controller explicitly and examine its class hierarchy:13 >> controller = StaticPagesController.new => #<StaticPagesController:0x22855d0> >> controller.class => StaticPagesController >> controller.class.superclass => ApplicationController >> controller.class.superclass.superclass => ActionController::Base >> controller.class.superclass.superclass.superclass => ActionController::Metal >> controller.class.superclass.superclass.superclass.superclass => AbstractController::Base >> controller.class.superclass.superclass.superclass.superclass.superclass => Object  A diagram of this hierarchy appears in Figure 4.3. We can even call the controller actions inside the console, which are just methods: >> controller.home => nil  Here the return value is nil because the home action is blank. But wait—actions don’t have return values, at least not ones that matter. The point of the home action, as we saw in Chapter 3, is to render a web page, not to return a value. And I sure don’t remember ever calling StaticPagesController.new anywhere. What’s going on? What’s going on is that Rails is written in Ruby, but Rails isn’t Ruby. Some Rails classes are used like ordinary Ruby objects, but some are just grist for Rails’ magic mill. Rails is sui generis, and should be studied and understood separately from Ruby. This is why, if your principal programming interest is writing web applications, I recommend learning Rails first, then learning Ruby, then looping back to Rails. ### 4.4.5 A user class We end our tour of Ruby with a complete class of our own, a User class that anticipates the User model coming up in Chapter 6. So far we’ve entered class definitions at the console, but this quickly becomes tiresome; instead, create the file example_user.rb in your application root directory and fill it with the contents of Listing 4.9. Listing 4.9. Code for an example user. example_user.rb class User attr_accessor :name, :email def initialize(attributes = {}) @name = attributes[:name] @email = attributes[:email] end def formatted_email "#{@name} <#{@email}>" end end  There’s quite a bit going on here, so let’s take it step by step. The first line,  attr_accessor :name, :email  creates attribute accessors corresponding to a user’s name and email address. This creates “getter” and “setter” methods that allow us to retrieve (get) and assign (set) @name and @email instance variables, which were mentioned briefly in Section 2.2.2. In Rails, the principal importance of instance variables is that they are automatically available in the views, but in general they are used for variables that need to be available throughout a Ruby class. (We’ll have more to say about this in a moment.) Instance variables always begin with an @ sign, and are nil when undefined. The first method, initialize, is special in Ruby: it’s the method called when we execute User.new. This particular initialize takes one argument, attributes:  def initialize(attributes = {}) @name = attributes[:name] @email = attributes[:email] end  Here the attributes variable has a default value equal to the empty hash, so that we can define a user with no name or email address (recall from Section 4.3.3 that hashes return nil for nonexistent keys, so attributes[:name] will be nil if there is no :name key, and similarly for attributes[:email]). Finally, our class defines a method called formatted_email that uses the values of the assigned @name and @email variables to build up a nicely formatted version of the user’s email address using string interpolation (Section 4.2.2):  def formatted_email "#{@name} <#{@email}>" end  Because @name and @email are both instance variables (as indicated with the @ sign), they are automatically available in the formatted_email method. Let’s fire up the console, require the example user code, and take our User class out for a spin: >> require './example_user' # This is how you load the example_user code. => ["User"] >> example = User.new => #<User:0x224ceec @email=nil, @name=nil> >> example.name # nil since attributes[:name] is nil => nil >> example.name = "Example User" # Assign a non-nil name => "Example User" >> example.email = "user@example.com" # and a non-nil email address => "user@example.com" >> example.formatted_email => "Example User <user@example.com>"  Here the ’.’ is Unix for “current directory”, and ’./example_user’ tells Ruby to look for an example user file relative to that location. The subsequent code creates an empty example user and then fills in the name and email address by assigning directly to the corresponding attributes (assignments made possible by the attr_accessor line in Listing 4.9). When we write example.name = "Example User"  Ruby is setting the @name variable to "Example User" (and similarly for the email attribute), which we then use in the formatted_email method. Recalling from Section 4.3.4 we can omit the curly braces for final hash arguments, we can create another user by passing a hash to the initialize method to create a user with pre-defined attributes: >> user = User.new(name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com") => #<User:0x225167c @email="mhartl@example.com", @name="Michael Hartl"> >> user.formatted_email => "Michael Hartl <mhartl@example.com>"  We will see starting in Chapter 7 that initializing objects using a hash argument, a technique known as mass assignment, is common in Rails applications. ## 4.5 Conclusion This concludes our overview of the Ruby language. In Chapter 5, we’ll start putting it to good use in developing the sample application. We won’t be using the example_user.rb file from Section 4.4.5, so I suggest removing it: $ rm example_user.rb


Then commit the other changes to the main source code repository:

$git add .$ git commit -m "Add a full_title helper"


## 4.6 Exercises

1. By replacing the question marks in Listing 4.10 with the appropriate methods, combine split, shuffle, and join to write a function that shuffles the letters in a given string.
2. Using Listing 4.11 as a guide, add a shuffle method to the String class.
3. Create three hashes called person1, person2, and person3, with first and last names under the keys :first and :last. Then create a params hash so that params[:father] is person1, params[:mother] is person2, and params[:child] is person3. Verify that, for example, params[:father][:first] has the right value.
4. Find an online version of the Ruby API and read about the Hash method merge.
5. Follow the Ruby Koans14 to reach Ruby enlightenment.
Listing 4.10. Skeleton for a string shuffle function.
>> def string_shuffle(s)
>>   s.split('').?.?
>> end
=> nil
>> string_shuffle("foobar")

Listing 4.11. Skeleton for a shuffle method attached to the String class.
>> class String
>>   def shuffle
>>     self.split('').?.?
>>   end
>> end
=> nil
>> "foobar".shuffle

1. If a helper is specific to a particular controller, you should put it in the corresponding helper file; for example, helpers for the StaticPages controller generally go in app/helpers/static_pages_helper.rb. In our case, we expect the full_title helper to be used on all the site’s pages, and Rails has a special helper file for this case: app/helpers/application_helper.rb
2. For more on the origins of “foo” and “bar”—and, in particular, the possible non-relation of “foobar” to “FUBAR”—see the Jargon File entry on “foo”
3. Programmers familiar with Perl or PHP should compare this to the automatic interpolation of dollar sign variables in expressions like "foo $bar" 4. Apologies in advance for switching haphazardly between function and method throughout this chapter; in Ruby, they’re the same thing: all methods are functions, and all functions are methods, because everything is an object. 5. Well, there will still be one thing left that we don’t understand, which is how Rails ties this all together: mapping URIs to actions, making the full_title helper available in views, etc. This is an interesting subject, and I encourage you to investigate it further, but knowing exactly how Rails works is not necessary when using Rails. (For a deeper understanding, I recommend The Rails 3 Way by Obie Fernandez.) 6. The second method used here isn’t currently part of Ruby itself, but rather is added by Rails. It works in this case because the Rails console automatically includes the Rails extensions to Ruby. 7. Programming experts, on the other hand, might benefit from knowing that blocks are closures, which are one-shot anonymous functions with data attached. 8. Ruby 1.9 actually guarantees that hashes keep their elements in the same order entered, but it would be unwise ever to count on a particular ordering. 9. As a result of having less baggage, symbols are easier to compare to each other; strings need to be compared character by character, while symbols can be compared all in one go. This makes them ideal for use as hash keys. 10. These results will vary based on the version of Ruby you are using. This example assumes you are using Ruby 1.9.3. 11. For more on Ruby classes and the self keyword, see the RailsTips post “Class and Instance Variables in Ruby”. 12. For those familiar with JavaScript, this functionality is comparable to using a built-in class prototype object to augment the class. (Thanks to reader Erik Eldridge for pointing this out.) 13. You don’t have to know what each class in this hierarchy does. I don’t know what they all do, and I’ve been programming in Ruby on Rails since 2005. This means either that (a) I’m grossly incompetent or (b) you can be a skilled Rails developer without knowing all its innards. I hope for both our sakes that it’s the latter. 14. http://rubykoans.com/ # Chapter 5 Filling in the layout In the process of taking a brief tour of Ruby in Chapter 4, we learned about including the application stylesheet into the sample application—but, as noted in Section 4.3.4, this stylesheet is currently empty. In this chapter, we’ll change this by incorporating the Bootstrap framework into our application, and then we’ll add some custom styles of our own.1 We’ll also start filling in the layout with links to the pages (such as Home and About) that we’ve created so far (Section 5.1). Along the way, we’ll learn about partials, Rails routes, and the asset pipeline, including an introduction to Sass (Section 5.2). We’ll also refactor the tests from Chapter 3 using the latest RSpec techniques. We’ll end by taking a first important step toward letting users sign up to our site. ## 5.1 Adding some structure The Rails Tutorial is a book on web development, not web design, but it would be depressing to work on an application that looks like complete crap, so in this section we’ll add some structure to the layout and give it some minimal styling with CSS. In addition to using some custom CSS rules, we’ll make use of Bootstrap, an open-source web design framework from Twitter. We’ll also give our code some styling, so to speak, using partials to tidy up the layout once it gets a little cluttered. When building web applications, it is often useful to get a high-level overview of the user interface as early as possible. Throughout the rest of this book, I will thus often include mockups (in a web context often called wireframes), which are rough sketches of what the eventual application will look like.2 In this chapter, we will principally be developing the static pages introduced in Section 3.1, including a site logo, a navigation header, and a site footer. A mockup for the most important of these pages, the Home page, appears in Figure 5.1. You can see the final result in Figure 5.7. You’ll note that it differs in some details—for example, we’ll end up adding a Rails logo on the page—but that’s fine, since a mockup need not be exact. As usual, if you’re using Git for version control, now would be a good time to make a new branch: $ git checkout -b filling-in-layout


As a first step toward adding links and styles to the sample application, we’ll update the site layout file application.html.erb (last seen in Listing 4.3) with additional HTML structure. This includes some additional divisions, some CSS classes, and the start of our site navigation. The full file is in Listing 5.1; explanations for the various pieces follow immediately thereafter. If you’d rather not delay gratification, you can see the results in Figure 5.2. (Note: it’s not (yet) very gratifying.)

Listing 5.1. The site layout with added structure.
app/views/layouts/application.html.erb
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title><%= full_title(yield(:title)) %></title>
<%= stylesheet_link_tag    "application", media: "all" %>
<%= javascript_include_tag "application" %>
<%= csrf_meta_tags %>
<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<![endif]-->
<body>
<div class="navbar-inner">
<div class="container">
<%= link_to "sample app", '#', id: "logo" %>
<nav>
<ul class="nav pull-right">
</ul>
</nav>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<%= yield %>
</div>
</body>
</html>


One thing to note immediately is the switch from Ruby 1.8–style hashes to the new Ruby 1.9 style (Section 4.3.3). That is,

<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", :media => "all" %>


has been replaced with

<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", media: "all" %>


Because the old hash syntax is still common, especially in older applications, it’s important to be able to recognize both forms.

Let’s look at the other new elements in Listing 5.1 from top to bottom. As noted briefly in Section 3.1, Rails 3 uses HTML5 by default (as indicated by the doctype <!DOCTYPE html>); since the HTML5 standard is relatively new, some browsers (especially older versions Internet Explorer) don’t fully support it, so we include some JavaScript code (known as an “HTML5 shim”) to work around the issue:

<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<![endif]-->


The somewhat odd syntax

<!--[if lt IE 9]>


includes the enclosed line only if the version of Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) is less than 9 (if lt IE 9). The weird [if lt IE 9] syntax is not part of Rails; it’s actually a conditional comment supported by Internet Explorer browsers for just this sort of situation. It’s a good thing, too, because it means we can include the HTML5 shim only for IE browsers less than version 9, leaving other browsers such as Firefox, Chrome, and Safari unaffected.

The next section includes a header for the site’s (plain-text) logo, a couple of divisions (using the div tag), and a list of elements with navigation links:

<header class="navbar navbar-fixed-top navbar-inverse">
<div class="navbar-inner">
<div class="container">
<%= link_to "sample app", '#', id: "logo" %>
<nav>
<ul class="nav pull-right">
</ul>
</nav>
</div>
</div>


Here the header tag indicates elements that should go at the top of the page. We’ve given the header tag three CSS classes,3 called navbar, navbar-fixed-top, and navbar-inverse, separated by spaces:

<header class="navbar navbar-fixed-top navbar-inverse">


All HTML elements can be assigned both classes and ids; these are merely labels, and are useful for styling with CSS (Section 5.1.2). The main difference between classes and ids is that classes can be used multiple times on a page, but ids can be used only once. In the present case, all the navbar classes have special meaning to the Bootstrap framework, which we’ll install and use in Section 5.1.2.

Inside the header tag, we see a couple of div tags:

<div class="navbar-inner">
<div class="container">


The div tag is a generic division; it doesn’t do anything apart from divide the document into distinct parts. In older-style HTML, div tags are used for nearly all site divisions, but HTML5 adds the header, nav, and section elements for divisions common to many applications. In this case, each div has a CSS class as well. As with the header tag’s classes, these classes have special meaning to Bootstrap.

After the divs, we encounter some embedded Ruby:

<%= link_to "sample app", '#', id: "logo" %>
<nav>
<ul class="nav pull-right">
</ul>
</nav>


This uses the Rails helper link_to to create links (which we created directly with the anchor tag a in Section 3.3.2); the first argument to link_to is the link text, while the second is the URI. We’ll fill in the URIs with named routes in Section 5.3.3, but for now we use the stub URI ’#’ commonly used in web design. The third argument is an options hash, in this case adding the CSS id logo to the sample app link. (The other three links have no options hash, which is fine since it’s optional.) Rails helpers often take options hashes in this way, giving us the flexibility to add arbitrary HTML options without ever leaving Rails.

The second element inside the divs is a list of navigation links, made using the unordered list tag ul, together with the list item tag li:

<nav>
<ul class="nav pull-right">
</ul>
</nav>


The nav tag, though formally unnecessary here, communicates the purpose of the navigation links. The nav and pull-right classes on the ul tag have special meaning to Bootstrap. Once Rails has processed this layout and evaluated the embedded Ruby, the list looks like this:

<nav>
<ul class="nav pull-right">
<li><a href="#">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Help</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>


The final part of the layout is a div for the main content:

<div class="container">
<%= yield %>
</div>


As before, the container class has special meaning to Bootstrap. As we learned in Section 3.3.4, the yield method inserts the contents of each page into the site layout.

Apart from the site footer, which we’ll add in Section 5.1.3, our layout is now complete, and we can look at the results by visiting the Home page. To take advantage of the upcoming style elements, we’ll add some extra elements to the home.html.erb view (Listing 5.2).

app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb
<div class="center hero-unit">
<h1>Welcome to the Sample App</h1>

<h2>
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a>
sample application.
</h2>

</div>

<%= link_to image_tag("rails.png", alt: "Rails"), 'http://rubyonrails.org/' %>


In preparation for adding users to our site in Chapter 7, the first link_to creates a stub link of the form

<a href="#" class="btn btn-large btn-primary">Sign up now!</a>


In the div tag, the hero-unit CSS class has a special meaning to Bootstrap, as do the btn, btn-large, and btn-primary classes in the signup button.

The second link_to shows off the image_tag helper, which takes as arguments the path to an image and an optional options hash, in this case setting the alt attribute of the image tag using symbols. To make this clearer, let’s look at the HTML this tag produces:4

<img alt="Rails" src="/assets/rails.png" />


The alt attribute is what will be displayed if there is no image, and it is also what will be displayed by screen readers for the visually impaired. Although people are sometimes sloppy about including the alt attribute for images, it is in fact required by the HTML standard. Luckily, Rails includes a default alt attribute; if you don’t specify the attribute in the call to image_tag, Rails just uses the image filename (minus extension). In this case, though, we’ve set the alt text explicitly in order to capitalize “Rails”.

Now we’re finally ready to see the fruits of our labors (Figure 5.2). Pretty underwhelming, you say? Perhaps so. Happily, though, we’ve done a good job of giving our HTML elements sensible classes, which puts us in a great position to add style to the site with CSS.

By the way, you might be surprised to discover that the rails.png image actually exists. Where did it come from? It’s included for free with every new Rails application, and you will find it in app/assets/images/rails.png. Because we used the image_tag helper, Rails finds it automatically using the asset pipeline (Section 5.2).

### 5.1.2 Bootstrap and custom CSS

In Section 5.1.1, we associated many of the HTML elements with CSS classes, which gives us considerable flexibility in constructing a layout based on CSS. As noted in Section 5.1.1, many of these classes are specific to Bootstrap, a framework from Twitter that makes it easy to add nice web design and user interface elements to an HTML5 application. In this section, we’ll combine Bootstrap with some custom CSS rules to start adding some style to the sample application.

Our first step is to add Bootstrap, which in Rails applications can be accomplished with the bootstrap-sass gem, as shown in Listing 5.3. The Bootstrap framework natively uses the LESS CSS language for making dynamic stylesheets, but the Rails asset pipeline supports the (very similar) Sass language by default (Section 5.2), so bootstrap-sass converts LESS to Sass and makes all the necessary Bootstrap files available to the current application.5

Listing 5.3. Adding the bootstrap-sass gem to the Gemfile.
source 'https://rubygems.org'

gem 'rails', '3.2.15'
gem 'bootstrap-sass', '2.1'
.
.
.


To install Bootstrap, we run bundle install as usual:

bundle install  Then restart the web server to incorporate the changes into the development application. (On most systems, restarting the server will involve pressing Ctrl-C and then running rails server.) The first step in adding custom CSS to our application is to create a file to contain it: app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss  (Use your text editor or IDE to create the new file.) Here both the directory name and filename are important. The directory app/assets/stylesheets  is part of the asset pipeline (Section 5.2), and any stylesheets in this directory will automatically be included as part of the application.css file included in the site layout. Furthermore, the filename custom.css.scss includes the .css extension, which indicates a CSS file, and the .scss extension, which indicates a “Sassy CSS” file and arranges for the asset pipeline to process the file using Sass. (We won’t be using Sass until Section 5.2.2, but it’s needed now for the bootstrap-sass gem to work its magic.) After creating the file for custom CSS, we can use the @import function to include Bootstrap, as shown in Listing 5.4. Listing 5.4. Adding Bootstrap CSS. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss @import "bootstrap";  This one line includes the entire Bootstrap CSS framework, with the result shown in in Figure 5.3. (You may have to use Ctrl-C restart the local web server. It’s also worth noting that the screenshots use Bootstrap 2.0, whereas the tutorial currently uses Bootstrap 2.1, so there may be minor differences in appearance. These are not cause for concern.) The placement of the text isn’t good and the logo doesn’t have any style, but the colors and signup button look promising. Next we’ll add some CSS that will be used site-wide for styling the layout and each individual page, as shown in Listing 5.5. There are quite a few rules in Listing 5.5; to get a sense of what a CSS rule does, it’s often helpful to comment it out using CSS comments, i.e., by putting it inside /* … */, and seeing what changes. The result of the CSS in Listing 5.5 is shown in Figure 5.4. Listing 5.5. Adding CSS for some universal styling applying to all pages. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss @import "bootstrap"; /* universal */ html { overflow-y: scroll; } body { padding-top: 60px; } section { overflow: auto; } textarea { resize: vertical; } .center { text-align: center; } .center h1 { margin-bottom: 10px; }  Note that the CSS in Listing 5.5 has a consistent form. In general, CSS rules refer either to a class, an id, an HTML tag, or some combination thereof, followed by a list of styling commands. For example, body { padding-top: 60px; }  puts 60 pixels of padding at the top of the page. Because of the navbar-fixed-top class in the header tag, Bootstrap fixes the navigation bar to the top of the page, so the padding serves to separate the main text from the navigation. (Because the default navbar color changed between Boostrap 2.0 and 2.1, we need the navbar-inverse class to make it dark instead of light.) Meanwhile, the CSS in the rule .center { text-align: center; }  associates the center class with the text-align: center property. In other words, the dot . in .center indicates that the rule styles a class. (As we’ll see in Listing 5.7, the pound sign # identifies a rule to style a CSS id.) This means that elements inside any tag (such as a div) with class center will be centered on the page. (We saw an example of this class in Listing 5.2.) Although Bootstrap comes with CSS rules for nice typography, we’ll also add some custom rules for the appearance of the text on our site, as shown in Listing 5.6. (Not all of these rules apply to the Home page, but each rule here will be used at some point in the sample application.) The result of Listing 5.6 is shown in Figure 5.5. Listing 5.6. Adding CSS for nice typography. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss @import "bootstrap"; . . . /* typography */ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { line-height: 1; } h1 { font-size: 3em; letter-spacing: -2px; margin-bottom: 30px; text-align: center; } h2 { font-size: 1.7em; letter-spacing: -1px; margin-bottom: 30px; text-align: center; font-weight: normal; color: #999; } p { font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.7em; }  Finally, we’ll add some rules to style the site’s logo, which simply consists of the text “sample app”. The CSS in Listing 5.7 converts the text to uppercase and modifies its size, color, and placement. (We’ve used a CSS id because we expect the site logo to appear on the page only once, but you could use a class instead.) Listing 5.7. Adding CSS for the site logo. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss @import "bootstrap"; . . . /* header */ #logo { float: left; margin-right: 10px; font-size: 1.7em; color: #fff; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: -1px; padding-top: 9px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1; } #logo:hover { color: #fff; text-decoration: none; }  Here color: #fff changes the color of the logo to white. HTML colors can be coded with three pairs of base-16 (hexadecimal) numbers, one each for the primary colors red, green, and blue (in that order). The code #ffffff maxes out all three colors, yielding pure white, and #fff is a shorthand for the full #ffffff. The CSS standard also defines a large number of synonyms for common HTML colors, including white for #fff. The result of the CSS in Listing 5.7 is shown in Figure 5.6. ### 5.1.3 Partials Although the layout in Listing 5.1 serves its purpose, it’s getting a little cluttered. The HTML shim takes up three lines and uses weird IE-specific syntax, so it would be nice to tuck it away somewhere on its own. In addition, the header HTML forms a logical unit, so it should all be packaged up in one place. The way to achieve this in Rails is to use a facility called partials. Let’s first take a look at what the layout looks like after the partials are defined (Listing 5.8). Listing 5.8. The site layout with partials for the stylesheets and header. app/views/layouts/application.html.erb <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title><%= full_title(yield(:title)) %></title> <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", media: "all" %> <%= javascript_include_tag "application" %> <%= csrf_meta_tags %> <%= render 'layouts/shim' %> </head> <body> <%= render 'layouts/header' %> <div class="container"> <%= yield %> </div> </body> </html>  In Listing 5.8, we’ve replaced the HTML shim stylesheet lines with a single call to a Rails helper called render: <%= render 'layouts/shim' %>  The effect of this line is to look for a file called app/views/layouts/_shim.html.erb, evaluate its contents, and insert the results into the view.6 (Recall that <%= ... %> is the embedded Ruby syntax needed to evaluate a Ruby expression and then insert the results into the template.) Note the leading underscore on the filename _shim.html.erb; this underscore is the universal convention for naming partials, and among other things makes it possible to identify all the partials in a directory at a glance. Of course, to get the partial to work, we have to fill it with some content; in the case of the shim partial, this is just the three lines of shim code from Listing 5.1; the result appears in Listing 5.9. Listing 5.9. A partial for the HTML shim. app/views/layouts/_shim.html.erb <!--[if lt IE 9]> <script src="http://html5shim.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/html5.js"></script> <![endif]-->  Similarly, we can move the header material into the partial shown in Listing 5.10 and insert it into the layout with another call to render. Listing 5.10. A partial for the site header. app/views/layouts/_header.html.erb <header class="navbar navbar-fixed-top navbar-inverse"> <div class="navbar-inner"> <div class="container"> <%= link_to "sample app", '#', id: "logo" %> <nav> <ul class="nav pull-right"> <li><%= link_to "Home", '#' %></li> <li><%= link_to "Help", '#' %></li> <li><%= link_to "Sign in", '#' %></li> </ul> </nav> </div> </div> </header>  Now that we know how to make partials, let’s add a site footer to go along with the header. By now you can probably guess that we’ll call it _footer.html.erb and put it in the layouts directory (Listing 5.11).7 Listing 5.11. A partial for the site footer. app/views/layouts/_footer.html.erb <footer class="footer"> <small> <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Rails Tutorial</a> by Michael Hartl </small> <nav> <ul> <li><%= link_to "About", '#' %></li> <li><%= link_to "Contact", '#' %></li> <li><a href="http://news.railstutorial.org/">News</a></li> </ul> </nav> </footer>  As with the header, in the footer we’ve used link_to for the internal links to the About and Contact pages and stubbed out the URIs with ’#’ for now. (As with header, the footer tag is new in HTML5.) We can render the footer partial in the layout by following the same pattern as the stylesheets and header partials (Listing 5.12). Listing 5.12. The site layout with a footer partial. app/views/layouts/application.html.erb <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title><%= full_title(yield(:title)) %></title> <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", media: "all" %> <%= javascript_include_tag "application" %> <%= csrf_meta_tags %> <%= render 'layouts/shim' %> </head> <body> <%= render 'layouts/header' %> <div class="container"> <%= yield %> <%= render 'layouts/footer' %> </div> </body> </html>  Of course, the footer will be ugly without some styling (Listing 5.13). The results appear in Figure 5.7. Listing 5.13. Adding the CSS for the site footer. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss . . . /* footer */ footer { margin-top: 45px; padding-top: 5px; border-top: 1px solid #eaeaea; color: #999; } footer a { color: #555; } footer a:hover { color: #222; } footer small { float: left; } footer ul { float: right; list-style: none; } footer ul li { float: left; margin-left: 10px; }  ## 5.2 Sass and the asset pipeline One of the most notable differences between Rails 3.0 and more recent versions is the asset pipeline, which significantly improves the production and management of static assets such as CSS, JavaScript, and images. This section gives a high-level overview of the asset pipeline and then shows how to use a remarkable tool for making CSS called Sass, now included by default as part of the asset pipeline. ### 5.2.1 The asset pipeline The asset pipeline involves lots of changes under Rails’ hood, but from the perspective of a typical Rails developer there are three principal features to understand: asset directories, manifest files, and preprocessor engines.8 Let’s consider each in turn. #### Asset directories In versions of Rails before 3.0 (including 3.0 itself), static assets lived in the public/ directory, as follows: • public/stylesheets • public/javascripts • public/images Files in these directories are (even post-3.0) automatically served up via requests to http://example.com/stylesheets, etc. Starting in Rails 3.1, there are three canonical directories for static assets, each with its own purpose: • app/assets: assets specific to the present application • lib/assets: assets for libraries written by your dev team • vendor/assets: assets from third-party vendors As you might guess, each of these directories has a subdirectory for each asset class, e.g.,  ls app/assets/
images      javascripts stylesheets


At this point, we’re in a position to understand the motivation behind the location of the custom.css.scss file in Section 5.1.2: custom.css.scss is specific to the sample application, so it goes in app/assets/stylesheets.

#### Manifest files

Once you’ve placed your assets in their logical locations, you can use manifest files to tell Rails (via the Sprockets gem) how to combine them to form single files. (This applies to CSS and JavaScript but not to images.) As an example, let’s take a look at the default manifest file for app stylesheets (Listing 5.14).

Listing 5.14. The manifest file for app-specific CSS.
app/assets/stylesheets/application.css
/*
* This is a manifest file that'll automatically include all the stylesheets
* available in this directory and any sub-directories. You're free to add
* application-wide styles to this file and they'll appear at the top of the
* compiled file, but it's generally better to create a new file per style
* scope.
*= require_self
*= require_tree .
*/


The key lines here are actually CSS comments, but they are used by Sprockets to include the proper files:

/*
.
.
.
*= require_self
*= require_tree .
*/


Here

*= require_tree .


ensures that all CSS files in the app/assets/stylesheets directory (including the tree subdirectories) are included into the application CSS. The line

*= require_self


specifies where in the loading sequence the CSS in application.css itself gets included.

Rails comes with sensible default manifest files, and in the Rails Tutorial we won’t need to make any changes, but the Rails Guides entry on the asset pipeline has more detail if you need it.

#### Preprocessor engines

After you’ve assembled your assets, Rails prepares them for the site template by running them through several preprocessing engines and using the manifest files to combine them for delivery to the browser. We tell Rails which processor to use using filename extensions; the three most common cases are .scss for Sass, .coffee for CoffeeScript, and .erb for embedded Ruby (ERb). We first covered ERb in Section 3.3.3, and cover Sass in Section 5.2.2. We won’t be needing CoffeeScript in this tutorial, but it’s an elegant little language that compiles to JavaScript. (The RailsCast on CoffeeScript basics is a good place to start.)

The preprocessor engines can be chained, so that

foobar.js.coffee

gets run through the CoffeeScript processor, and

foobar.js.erb.coffee

gets run through both CoffeeScript and ERb (with the code running from right to left, i.e., CoffeeScript first).

#### Efficiency in production

One of the best things about the asset pipeline is that it automatically results in assets that are optimized to be efficient in a production application. Traditional methods for organizing CSS and JavaScript involve splitting functionality into separate files and using nice formatting (with lots of indentation). While convenient for the programmer, this is inefficient in production; including multiple full-sized files can significantly slow page-load times (one of the most important factors affecting the quality of the user experience). With the asset pipeline, in production all the application stylesheets get rolled into one CSS file (application.css), all the application JavaScript code gets rolled into one JavaScript file (javascripts.js), and all such files (including those in lib/assets and vendor/assets) are minified to remove the unnecessary whitespace that bloats file size. As a result, we get the best of both worlds: multiple nicely formatted files for programmer convenience, with single optimized files in production.

### 5.2.2 Syntactically awesome stylesheets

Sass is a language for writing stylesheets that improves on CSS in many ways. In this section, we cover two of the most important improvements, nesting and variables. (A third technique, mixins, is introduced in Section 7.1.1.)

As noted briefly in Section 5.1.2, Sass supports a format called SCSS (indicated with a .scss filename extension), which is a strict superset of CSS itself; that is, SCSS only adds features to CSS, rather than defining an entirely new syntax.9 This means that every valid CSS file is also a valid SCSS file, which is convenient for projects with existing style rules. In our case, we used SCSS from the start in order to take advantage of Bootstrap. Since the Rails asset pipeline automatically uses Sass to process files with the .scss extension, the custom.css.scss file will be run through the Sass preprocessor before being packaged up for delivery to the browser.

#### Nesting

A common pattern in stylesheets is having rules that apply to nested elements. For example, in Listing 5.5 we have rules both for .center and for .center h1:

.center {
text-align: center;
}

.center h1 {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}


We can replace this in Sass with

.center {
text-align: center;
h1 {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
}


Here the nested h1 rule automatically inherits the .center context.

There’s a second candidate for nesting that requires a slightly different syntax. In Listing 5.7, we have the code

#logo {
float: left;
margin-right: 10px;
font-size: 1.7em;
color: #fff;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: -1px;
font-weight: bold;
line-height: 1;
}

#logo:hover {
color: #fff;
text-decoration: none;
}


Here the logo id #logo appears twice, once by itself and once with the hover attribute (which controls its appearance when the mouse pointer hovers over the element in question). In order to nest the second rule, we need to reference the parent element #logo; in SCSS, this is accomplished with the ampersand character & as follows:

#logo {
float: left;
margin-right: 10px;
font-size: 1.7em;
color: #fff;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: -1px;
font-weight: bold;
line-height: 1;
&:hover {
color: #fff;
text-decoration: none;
}
}


Sass changes &:hover into #logo:hover as part of converting from SCSS to CSS.

Both of these nesting techniques apply to the footer CSS in Listing 5.13, which can be transformed into the following:

footer {
margin-top: 45px;
border-top: 1px solid #eaeaea;
color: #999;
a {
color: #555;
&:hover {
color: #222;
}
}
small {
float: left;
}
ul {
float: right;
list-style: none;
li {
float: left;
margin-left: 10px;
}
}
}


Converting Listing 5.13 by hand is a good exercise, and you should verify that the CSS still works properly after the conversion.

#### Variables

Sass allows us to define variables to eliminate duplication and write more expressive code. For example, looking at Listing 5.6 and Listing 5.13, we see that there are repeated references to the same color:

h2 {
.
.
.
color: #999;
}
.
.
.
footer {
.
.
.
color: #999;
}


In this case, #999 is a light gray, and we can give it a name by defining a variable as follows:

$lightGray: #999;  This allows us to rewrite our SCSS like this: $lightGray: #999;
.
.
.
h2 {
.
.
.
color: $lightGray; } . . . footer { . . . color:$lightGray;
}


Because variable names such as $lightGray are more descriptive than #999, it’s often useful to define variables even for values that aren’t repeated. Indeed, the Bootstrap framework defines a large number of variables for colors, available online on the Bootstrap page of LESS variables. That page defines variables using LESS, not Sass, but the bootstrap-sass gem provides the Sass equivalents. It is not difficult to guess the correspondence; where LESS uses an “at” sign @, Sass uses a dollar sign $. Looking the Bootstrap variable page, we see that there is a variable for light gray:

 @grayLight: #999;


This means that, via the bootstrap-sass gem, there should be a corresponding SCSS variable $grayLight. We can use this to replace our custom variable, $lightGray, which gives

h2 {
.
.
.
color: $grayLight; } . . . footer { . . . color:$grayLight;
}


Applying the Sass nesting and variable definition features to the full SCSS file gives the file in Listing 5.15. This uses both Sass variables (as inferred from the Bootstrap LESS variable page) and built-in named colors (i.e., white for #fff). Note in particular the dramatic improvement in the rules for the footer tag.

Listing 5.15. The initial SCSS file converted to use nesting and variables.
app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss
@import "bootstrap";

/* mixins, variables, etc. */

grayMediumLight: #eaeaea; /* universal */ html { overflow-y: scroll; } body { padding-top: 60px; } section { overflow: auto; } textarea { resize: vertical; } .center { text-align: center; h1 { margin-bottom: 10px; } } /* typography */ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { line-height: 1; } h1 { font-size: 3em; letter-spacing: -2px; margin-bottom: 30px; text-align: center; } h2 { font-size: 1.7em; letter-spacing: -1px; margin-bottom: 30px; text-align: center; font-weight: normal; color:grayLight;
}

p {
font-size: 1.1em;
line-height: 1.7em;
}

#logo {
float: left;
margin-right: 10px;
font-size: 1.7em;
color: white;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: -1px;
font-weight: bold;
line-height: 1;
&:hover {
color: white;
text-decoration: none;
}
}

/* footer */

footer {
margin-top: 45px;
border-top: 1px solid $grayMediumLight; color:$grayLight;
a {
color: $gray; &:hover { color:$grayDarker;
}
}
small {
float: left;
}
ul {
float: right;
list-style: none;
li {
float: left;
margin-left: 10px;
}
}
}


Sass gives us even more ways to simplify our stylesheets, but the code in Listing 5.15 uses the most important features and gives us a great start. See the Sass website for more details.

Now that we’ve finished a site layout with decent styling, it’s time to start filling in the links we’ve stubbed out with ’#’. Of course, we could hard-code links like

<a href="/static_pages/about">About</a>


but that isn’t the Rails Way. For one, it would be nice if the URI for the about page were /about rather than /static_pages/about; moreover, Rails conventionally uses named routes, which involves code like

<%= link_to "About", about_path %>


This way the code has a more transparent meaning, and it’s also more flexible since we can change the definition of about_path and have the URI change everywhere about_path is used.

The full list of our planned links appears in Table 5.1, along with their mapping to URIs and routes. We’ll implement all but the last one by the end of this chapter. (We’ll make the last one in Chapter 8.)

PageURINamed route
Home/root_path
About/aboutabout_path
Help/helphelp_path
Contact/contactcontact_path
Sign up/signupsignup_path
Sign in/signinsignin_path
Table 5.1: Route and URI mapping for site links.

Before moving on, let’s add a Contact page (left as an exercise in Chapter 3). The test appears as in Listing 5.16, which simply follows the model last seen in Listing 3.18. Note that, as in the application code, in Listing 5.16 we’ve switched to Ruby 1.9–style hashes.

Listing 5.16. Tests for a Contact page.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do
.
.
.
describe "Contact page" do

it "should have the h1 'Contact'" do
visit '/static_pages/contact'
page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Contact')
end

it "should have the title 'Contact'" do
visit '/static_pages/contact'
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Contact")
end
end
end


You should verify that these tests fail:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  The application code parallels the addition of the About page in Section 3.2.2: first we update the routes (Listing 5.17), then we add a contact action to the StaticPages controller (Listing 5.18), and finally we create a Contact view (Listing 5.19). Listing 5.17. Adding a route for the Contact page. config/routes.rb SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do get "static_pages/home" get "static_pages/help" get "static_pages/about" get "static_pages/contact" . . . end  Listing 5.18. Adding an action for the Contact page. app/controllers/static_pages_controller.rb class StaticPagesController < ApplicationController . . . def contact end end  Listing 5.19. The view for the Contact page. app/views/static_pages/contact.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'Contact') %> <h1>Contact</h1> <p> Contact Ruby on Rails Tutorial about the sample app at the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/contact">contact page</a>. </p>  Now make sure that the tests pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


### 5.3.1 Route tests

With the work we’ve done writing integration tests for the static pages, writing tests for the routes is simple: we just replace each occurrence of a hard-coded address with the desired named route from Table 5.1. In other words, we change

visit '/static_pages/about'


to

visit about_path


and so on for the other pages. The result appears in Listing 5.20.

Listing 5.20. Tests for the named routes.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do
visit root_path
page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sample App')
end

it "should have the base title" do
visit root_path
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App")
end

it "should not have a custom page title" do
visit root_path
page.should_not have_selector('title', text: '| Home')
end
end

describe "Help page" do

it "should have the h1 'Help'" do
visit help_path
page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Help')
end

it "should have the title 'Help'" do
visit help_path
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Help")
end
end

it "should have the h1 'About'" do
end

it "should have the title 'About Us'" do
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | About Us")
end
end

describe "Contact page" do

it "should have the h1 'Contact'" do
visit contact_path
page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Contact')
end

it "should have the title 'Contact'" do
visit contact_path
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | Contact")
end
end
end


As usual, you should check that the tests are now red:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  By the way, if the code in Listing 5.20 strikes you as repetitive and verbose, you’re not alone. We’ll refactor this mess into a beautiful jewel in Section 5.3.4. ### 5.3.2 Rails routes Now that we have tests for the URIs we want, it’s time to get them to work. As noted in Section 3.1.2, the file Rails uses for URI mappings is config/routes.rb. If you take a look at the default routes file, you’ll see that it’s quite a mess, but it’s a useful mess—full of commented-out example route mappings. I suggest reading through it at some point, and I also suggest taking a look at the Rails Guides article “Rails Routing from the outside in” for a much more in-depth treatment of routes. To define the named routes, we need to replace rules such as get 'static_pages/help'  with match '/help', to: 'static_pages#help'  This arranges both for a valid page at /help and a named route called help_path that returns the path to that page. (Actually, using get in place of match gives the same named routes, but using match is more conventional.) Applying this pattern to the other static pages gives Listing 5.21. The only exception is the Home page, which we’ll take care of in Listing 5.23. Listing 5.21. Routes for static pages. config/routes.rb SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do match '/help', to: 'static_pages#help' match '/about', to: 'static_pages#about' match '/contact', to: 'static_pages#contact' . . . end  If you read the code in Listing 5.21 carefully, you can probably figure out what it does; for example, you can see that match '/about', to: 'static_pages#about'  matches ’/about’ and routes it to the about action in the StaticPages controller. Before, this was more explicit: we used get 'static_pages/about'  to get to the same place, but /about is more succinct. In addition, as mentioned above, the code match ’/about’ also automatically creates named routes for use in the controllers and views: about_path => '/about' about_url => 'http://localhost:3000/about'  Note that about_url is the full URI http://localhost:3000/about (with localhost:3000 being replaced with the domain name, such as example.com, for a fully deployed site). As discussed in Section 5.3, to get just /about, you use about_path. In the Rails Tutorial, we’ll follow the common convention of using the path form except when doing redirects, where we’ll use the url form. This is because after redirects the HTTP standard technically requires a full URI, although in most browsers it will work either way. With these routes now defined, the tests for the Help, About, and Contact pages should pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


This leaves the test for the Home page as the last one to fail.

To establish the route mapping for the Home page, we could use code like this:

match '/', to: 'static_pages#home'


This is unnecessary, though; Rails has special instructions for the root URI / (“slash”) located lower down in the file (Listing 5.22).

Listing 5.22. The commented-out hint for defining the root route.
config/routes.rb
SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do
.
.
.
# You can have the root of your site routed with "root"
# just remember to delete public/index.html.
# root :to => "welcome#index"
.
.
.
end


Using Listing 5.22 as a model, we arrive at Listing 5.23 to route the root URI / to the Home page.

Listing 5.23. Adding a mapping for the root route.
config/routes.rb
SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do
root to: 'static_pages#home'

match '/help',    to: 'static_pages#help'
match '/contact', to: 'static_pages#contact'
.
.
.
end


This code maps the root URI / to /static_pages/home, and also gives URI helpers as follows:

root_path => '/'
root_url  => 'http://localhost:3000/'


We should also heed the comment in Listing 5.22 and delete public/index.html to prevent Rails from rendering the default page (Figure 1.3) when we visit /. You can of course simply remove the file by trashing it, but if you’re using Git for version control there’s a way to tell Git about the removal at the same time using git rm:

$git rm public/index.html  With that, all of the routes for static pages are working, and the tests should pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb


Now we just have to fill in the links in the layout.

### 5.3.3 Named routes

Let’s put the named routes created in Section 5.3.2 to work in our layout. This will entail filling in the second arguments of the link_to functions with the proper named routes. For example, we’ll convert

<%= link_to "About", '#' %>


to

<%= link_to "About", about_path %>


and so on.

We’ll start in the header partial, _header.html.erb (Listing 5.24), which has links to the Home and Help pages. While we’re at it, we’ll follow a common web convention and link the logo to the Home page as well.

app/views/layouts/_header.html.erb
<header class="navbar navbar-fixed-top navbar-inverse">
<div class="navbar-inner">
<div class="container">
<%= link_to "sample app", root_path, id: "logo" %>
<nav>
<ul class="nav pull-right">
</ul>
</nav>
</div>
</div>


We won’t have a named route for the “Sign in” link until Chapter 8, so we’ve left it as ’#’ for now.

The other place with links is the footer partial, _footer.html.erb, which has links for the About and Contact pages (Listing 5.25).

Listing 5.25. Footer partial with links.
app/views/layouts/_footer.html.erb
<footer class="footer">
<small>
<a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Rails Tutorial</a>
by Michael Hartl
</small>
<nav>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://news.railstutorial.org/">News</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>
</footer>


With that, our layout has links to all the static pages created in Chapter 3, so that, for example, /about goes to the About page (Figure 5.8).

By the way, it’s worth noting that, although we haven’t actually tested for the presence of the links on the layout, our tests will fail if the routes aren’t defined. You can check this by commenting out the routes in Listing 5.21 and running your test suite. For a testing method that actually makes sure the links go to the right places, see Section 5.6.

### 5.3.4 Pretty RSpec

We noted in Section 5.3.1 that the tests for the static pages are getting a little verbose and repetitive (Listing 5.20). In this section we’ll make use of the latest features of RSpec to make our tests more compact and elegant.

Let’s take a look at a couple of the examples to see how they can be improved:

describe "Home page" do

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do
visit root_path
page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sample App')
end

it "should have the base title" do
visit root_path
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App")
end

it "should not have a custom page title" do
visit root_path
page.should_not have_selector('title', text: '| Home')
end
end


One thing we notice is that all three examples include a visit to the root path. We can eliminate this duplication with a before block:

describe "Home page" do
before { visit root_path }

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do
page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sample App')
end

it "should have the base title" do
page.should have_selector('title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App")
end

it "should not have a custom page title" do
page.should_not have_selector('title', text: '| Home')
end
end


This uses the line

before { visit root_path }


to visit the root path before each example. (The before method can also be invoked with before(:each), which is a synonym.)

Another source of duplication appears in each example; we have both

it "should have the h1 'Sample App'" do


and

page.should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sample App')


which say essentially the same thing. In addition, both examples reference the page variable. We can eliminate these sources of duplication by telling RSpec that page is the subject of the tests using

subject { page }


and then using a variant of the it method to collapse the code and description into one line:

it { should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sample App') }


Because of subject { page }, the call to should automatically uses the page variable supplied by Capybara (Section 3.2.1).

Applying these changes gives much more compact tests for the Home page:

  subject { page }

before { visit root_path }

it { should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sample App') }
it { should have_selector 'title',
text: "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App" }
it { should_not have_selector 'title', text: '| Home' }
end


This code looks nicer, but the title test is still a bit long. Indeed, most of the title tests in Listing 5.20 have long title text of the form

"Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App | About"


An exercise in Section 3.5 proposes eliminating some of this duplication by defining a base_title variable and using string interpolation (Listing 3.30). We can do even better by defining a full_title, which parallels the full_title helper from Listing 4.2. We do this by creating both a spec/support directory and a utilities.rb file for RSpec utilities (Listing 5.26).

Listing 5.26. A file for RSpec utilities with a full_title function.
spec/support/utilities.rb
def full_title(page_title)
base_title = "Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App"
if page_title.empty?
base_title
else
"#{base_title} | #{page_title}"
end
end


Of course, this is essentially a duplicate of the helper in Listing 4.2, but having two independent methods allows us to catch any typos in the base title. This is dubious design, though, and a better (slightly more advanced) approach, which tests the original full_title helper directly, appears in the exercises (Section 5.6).

Files in the spec/support directory are automatically included by RSpec, which means that we can write the Home tests as follows:

  subject { page }

before { visit root_path }

it { should have_selector('h1',    text: 'Sample App') }
it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title('')) }
it { should_not have_selector 'title', text: '| Home' }
end


We can now simplify the tests for the Help, About, and Contact pages using the same methods used for the Home page. The results appear in Listing 5.27.

Listing 5.27. Prettier tests for the static pages.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do

subject { page }

before { visit root_path }

it { should have_selector('h1',    text: 'Sample App') }
it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title('')) }
it { should_not have_selector 'title', text: '| Home' }
end

describe "Help page" do
before { visit help_path }

it { should have_selector('h1',    text: 'Help') }
it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title('Help')) }
end

it { should have_selector('h1',    text: 'About') }
it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title('About Us')) }
end

describe "Contact page" do
before { visit contact_path }

it { should have_selector('h1',    text: 'Contact') }
it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title('Contact')) }
end
end


You should now verify that the tests still pass:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb  This RSpec style in Listing 5.27 is much pithier than the style in Listing 5.20—indeed, it can be made even pithier (Section 5.6). We will use this more compact style whenever possible when developing the rest of the sample application. ## 5.4 User signup: A first step As a capstone to our work on the layout and routing, in this section we’ll make a route for the signup page, which will mean creating a second controller along the way. This is a first important step toward allowing users to register for our site; we’ll take the next step, modeling users, in Chapter 6, and we’ll finish the job in Chapter 7. ### 5.4.1 Users controller It’s been a while since we created our first controller, the StaticPages controller, way back in Section 3.1.2. It’s time to create a second one, the Users controller. As before, we’ll use generate to make the simplest controller that meets our present needs, namely, one with a stub signup page for new users. Following the conventional REST architecture favored by Rails, we’ll call the action for new users new and pass it as an argument to generate controller to create it automatically (Listing 5.28). Listing 5.28. Generating a Users controller (with a new action). $ rails generate controller Users new --no-test-framework
create  app/controllers/users_controller.rb
route  get "users/new"
invoke  erb
create    app/views/users
create    app/views/users/new.html.erb
invoke  helper
create    app/helpers/users_helper.rb
invoke  assets
invoke    coffee
create      app/assets/javascripts/users.js.coffee
invoke    scss
create      app/assets/stylesheets/users.css.scss


This creates a Users controller with a new action (Listing 5.29) and a stub user view (Listing 5.30).

Listing 5.29. The initial Users controller, with a new action.
app/controllers/users_controller.rb
class UsersController < ApplicationController
def new
end

end

Listing 5.30. The initial new view for Users.
app/views/users/new.html.erb
<h1>Users#new</h1>
<p>Find me in app/views/users/new.html.erb</p>


### 5.4.2 Signup URI

With the code from Section 5.4.1, we already have a working page for new users at /users/new, but recall from Table 5.1 that we want the URI to be /signup instead. As in Section 5.3, we’ll first write some integration tests, which we’ll now generate:

$rails generate integration_test user_pages  Then, following the model of the static pages spec in Listing 5.27, we’ll fill in the user pages test with code to test for the contents of the h1 and title tags, as seen in Listing 5.31. Listing 5.31. The initial spec for users, with a test for the signup page. spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe "User pages" do subject { page } describe "signup page" do before { visit signup_path } it { should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sign up') } it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title('Sign up')) } end end  We can run these tests using the rspec command as usual: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb


It’s worth noting that we can also run all the request specs by passing the whole directory instead of just one file:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/  Based on this pattern, you may be able to guess how to run all the specs: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


For completeness, we’ll usually use this method to run the tests through the rest of the tutorial. By the way, it’s worth noting (since you may see other people use it) that you can also run the test suite using the spec Rake task:

$bundle exec rake spec  (In fact, you can just type rake by itself; the default behavior of rake is to run the test suite.) The only caveat is that using rake to run the tests for the current sample application will raise an error since it requires the test database to be prepared properly, a step we’ll defer to Section 6.2.1. By construction, the Users controller already has a new action, so to get the test to pass all we need is the right route and the right view content. We’ll follow the examples from Listing 5.21 and add a match ’/signup’ rule for the signup URI (Listing 5.32). Listing 5.32. A route for the signup page. config/routes.rb SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do get "users/new" root to: 'static_pages#home' match '/signup', to: 'users#new' match '/help', to: 'static_pages#help' match '/about', to: 'static_pages#about' match '/contact', to: 'static_pages#contact' . . . end  Note that we have kept the rule get "users/new", which was generated automatically by the Users controller generation in Listing 5.28. Currently, this rule is necessary for the ’users/new’ routing to work, but it doesn’t follow the proper REST conventions (Table 2.2), and we will eliminate it in Section 7.1.2. To get the tests to pass, all we need now is a view with the title and heading “Sign up” (Listing 5.33). Listing 5.33. The initial (stub) signup page. app/views/users/new.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'Sign up') %> <h1>Sign up</h1> <p>Find me in app/views/users/new.html.erb</p>  At this point, the signup test in Listing 5.31 should pass. All that’s left is to add the proper link to the button on the Home page. As with the other routes, match ’/signup’ gives us the named route signup_path, which we put to use in Listing 5.34. Listing 5.34. Linking the button to the Signup page. app/views/static_pages/home.html.erb <div class="center hero-unit"> <h1>Welcome to the Sample App</h1> <h2> This is the home page for the <a href="http://railstutorial.org/">Ruby on Rails Tutorial</a> sample application. </h2> <%= link_to "Sign up now!", signup_path, class: "btn btn-large btn-primary" %> </div> <%= link_to image_tag("rails.png", alt: "Rails"), 'http://rubyonrails.org/' %>  With that, we’re done with the links and named routes, at least until we add a route for signing in (Chapter 8). The resulting new user page (at the URI /signup) appears in Figure 5.9. At this point the tests should pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


## 5.5 Conclusion

In this chapter, we’ve hammered our application layout into shape and polished up the routes. The rest of the book is dedicated to fleshing out the sample application: first, by adding users who can sign up, sign in, and sign out; next, by adding user microposts; and, finally, by adding the ability to follow other users.

At this point, if you are using Git you should merge the changes back into the master branch:

$git add .$ git commit -m "Finish layout and routes"
$git checkout master$ git merge filling-in-layout


You can also push up to GitHub:

$git push  Finally, you can deploy to Heroku: $ git push heroku


The result should be a working sample application on the production server:

$heroku open  If you run into trouble, try running $ heroku logs


to debug the error using the Heroku logfile.

## 5.6 Exercises

1. The code in Listing 5.27 for testing static pages is compact but is still a bit repetitive. RSpec supports a facility called shared examples to eliminate this kind of duplication. By following the example in Listing 5.35, fill in the missing tests for the Help, About, and Contact pages. Note that the let command, introduced briefly in Listing 3.30, creates a local variable with the given value on demand (i.e., when the variable is used), in contrast to an instance variable, which is created upon assignment.
2. You may have noticed that our tests for the layout links test the routing but don’t actually check that the links on the layout go to the right pages. One way to implement these tests is to use visit and click_link inside the RSpec integration test. Fill in the code in Listing 5.36 to verify that all the layout links are properly defined.
3. Eliminate the need for the full_title test helper in Listing 5.26 by writing tests for the original helper method, as shown in Listing 5.37. (You will have to create both the spec/helpers directory and the application_helper_spec.rb file.) Then include it into the test using the code in Listing 5.38. Verify by running the test suite that the new code is still valid. Note: Listing 5.37 uses regular expressions, which we’ll learn more about in Section 6.2.4. (Thanks to Alex Chaffee for the suggestion and code used in this exercise.)
Listing 5.35. Using an RSpec shared example to eliminate test duplication.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do

subject { page }

shared_examples_for "all static pages" do
it { should have_selector('h1',    text: heading) }
it { should have_selector('title', text: full_title(page_title)) }
end

before { visit root_path }
let(:page_title) { '' }

it_should_behave_like "all static pages"
it { should_not have_selector 'title', text: '| Home' }
end

describe "Help page" do
.
.
.
end

.
.
.
end

describe "Contact page" do
.
.
.
end
end

Listing 5.36. A test for the links on the layout.
spec/requests/static_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "Static pages" do
.
.
.
it "should have the right links on the layout" do
visit root_path
page.should have_selector 'title', text: full_title('About Us')
page.should # fill in
page.should # fill in
page.should # fill in
page.should # fill in
end
end

Listing 5.37. Tests for the full_title helper.
spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe ApplicationHelper do

describe "full_title" do
it "should include the page title" do
full_title("foo").should =~ /foo/
end

it "should include the base title" do
full_title("foo").should =~ /^Ruby on Rails Tutorial Sample App/
end

full_title("").should_not =~ /\|/
end
end
end

Listing 5.38. Replacing the full_title test helper with a simple include.
spec/support/utilities.rb
include ApplicationHelper

1. Thanks to reader Colm Tuite for his excellent work in helping to convert the sample application over to Bootstrap.
2. The mockups in the Ruby on Rails Tutorial are made with an excellent online mockup application called Mockingbird
3. These are completely unrelated to Ruby classes.
4. You might notice that the img tag, rather than looking like <img>...</img>, instead looks like <img ... />. Tags that follow this form are known as self-closing tags.
5. It is also possible to use LESS with the asset pipeline; see the less-rails-bootstrap gem for details.
6. Many Rails developers use a shared directory for partials shared across different views. I prefer to use the shared folder for utility partials that are useful on multiple views, while putting partials that are literally on every page (as part of the site layout) in the layouts directory. (We’ll create the shared directory starting in Chapter 7.) That seems to me a logical division, but putting them all in the shared folder certainly works fine, too.
7. You may wonder why we use both the footer tag and .footer class. The answer is that the tag has a clear meaning to human readers, and the class is used by Bootstrap. Using a div tag in place of footer would work as well.
8. The structure of this section is based on the excellent blog post The Rails 3 Asset Pipeline in (about) 5 Minutes by Michael Erasmus. For more details, see the Rails Guide on the Asset Pipeline
9. The older .sass format, also supported by Sass, defines a new language which is less verbose (and has fewer curly braces) but is less convenient for existing projects and is harder to learn for those already familiar with CSS.

# Chapter 6 Modeling users

In Chapter 5, we ended with a stub page for creating new users (Section 5.4); over the course of the next four chapters, we’ll fulfill the promise implicit in this incipient signup page. The first critical step is to create a data model for users of our site, together with a way to store that data. In Chapter 7, we’ll give users the ability to sign up for our site and create a user profile page. Once users can sign up, we’ll let them sign in and sign out as well (Chapter 8), and in Chapter 9 (Section 9.2.1) we’ll learn how to protect pages from improper access. Taken together, the material in Chapter 6 through Chapter 9 develops a full Rails login and authentication system. As you may know, there are various pre-built authentication solutions for Rails; Box 6.1 explains why, at least at first, it’s probably a better idea to roll your own.

This is a long and action-packed chapter, and you may find it unusually challenging, especially if you are new to data modeling. By the end of it, though, we will have created an industrial-strength system for validating, storing, and retrieving user information.

As usual, if you’re following along using Git for version control, now would be a good time to make a topic branch for modeling users:

$git checkout master$ git checkout -b modeling-users


(The first line here is just to make sure that you start on the master branch, so that the modeling-users topic branch is based on master. You can skip that command if you’re already on the master branch.)

## 6.1 User model

Although the ultimate goal of the next three chapters is to make a signup page for our site (mocked up in Figure 6.1), it would do little good now to accept information for new users: we don’t currently have any place to put it. Thus, the first step in signing up users is to make a data structure to capture and store their information.

In Rails, the default data structure for a data model is called, naturally enough, a model (the M in MVC from Section 1.2.6). The default Rails solution to the problem of persistence is to use a database for long-term data storage, and the default library for interacting with the database is called Active Record.1 Active Record comes with a host of methods for creating, saving, and finding data objects, all without having to use the structured query language (SQL)2 used by relational databases. Moreover, Rails has a feature called migrations to allow data definitions to be written in pure Ruby, without having to learn an SQL data definition language (DDL). The effect is that Rails insulates you almost entirely from the details of the data store. In this book, by using SQLite for development and PostgreSQL (via Heroku) for deployment (Section 1.4), we have developed this theme even further, to the point where we barely ever have to think about how Rails stores data, even for production applications.

### 6.1.1 Database migrations

You may recall from Section 4.4.5 that we have already encountered, via a custom-built User class, user objects with name and email attributes. That class served as a useful example, but it lacked the critical property of persistence: when we created a User object at the Rails console, it disappeared as soon as we exited. Our goal in this section is to create a model for users that won’t disappear quite so easily.

As with the User class in Section 4.4.5, we’ll start by modeling a user with two attributes, a name and an email address, the latter of which we’ll use as a unique username.3 (We’ll add an attribute for passwords in Section 6.3.) In Listing 4.9, we did this with Ruby’s attr_accessor method:

class User
attr_accessor :name, :email
.
.
.
end


In contrast, when using Rails to model users we don’t need to identify the attributes explicitly. As noted briefly above, to store data Rails uses a relational database by default, which consists of tables composed of data rows, where each row has columns of data attributes. For example, to store users with names and email addresses, we’ll create a users table with name and email columns (with each row corresponding to one user). By naming the columns in this way, we’ll let Active Record figure out the User object attributes for us.

Let’s see how this works. (If this discussion gets too abstract for your taste, be patient; the console examples starting in Section 6.1.3 and the database browser screenshots in Figure 6.3 and Figure 6.6 should make things clearer.) You may recall from Listing 5.28 that we created a Users controller (along with a new action) using the command

$rails generate controller Users new --no-test-framework  There is an analogous command for making a model: generate model. Listing 6.1 shows the command to generate a User model with two attributes, name and email. Listing 6.1. Generating a User model. $ rails generate model User name:string email:string
invoke  active_record
create    db/migrate/[timestamp]_create_users.rb
create    app/models/user.rb
invoke    rspec
create      spec/models/user_spec.rb


(Note that, in contrast to the plural convention for controller names, model names are singular: a Users controller, but a User model.) By passing the optional parameters name:string and email:string, we tell Rails about the two attributes we want, along with what types those attributes should be (in this case, string). Compare this with including the action names in Listing 3.4 and Listing 5.28.

One of the results of the generate command in Listing 6.1 is a new file called a migration. Migrations provide a way to alter the structure of the database incrementally, so that our data model can adapt to changing requirements. In the case of the User model, the migration is created automatically by the model generation script; it creates a users table with two columns, name and email, as shown in Listing 6.2. (We’ll see in Section 6.2.5 and again in Section 6.3 how to make a migration from scratch.)

Listing 6.2. Migration for the User model (to create a users table).
db/migrate/[timestamp]_create_users.rb
class CreateUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration
def change
create_table :users do |t|
t.string :name
t.string :email

t.timestamps
end
end
end


Note that the name of the migration file is prefixed by a timestamp based on when the migration was generated. In the early days of migrations, the filenames were prefixed with incrementing integers, which caused conflicts for collaborating teams if multiple programmers had migrations with the same number. Barring the improbable scenario of migrations generated the same second, using timestamps conveniently avoids such collisions.

The migration itself consists of a change method that determines the change to be made to the database. In the case of Listing 6.2, change uses a Rails method called create_table to create a table in the database for storing users. The create_table method accepts a block (Section 4.3.2) with one block variable, in this case called t (for “table”). Inside the block, the create_table method uses the t object to create name and email columns in the database, both of type string.4 Here the table name is plural (users) even though the model name is singular (User), which reflects a linguistic convention followed by Rails: a model represents a single user, whereas a database table consists of many users. The final line in the block, t.timestamps, is a special command that creates two magic columns called created_at and updated_at, which are timestamps that automatically record when a given user is created and updated. (We’ll see concrete examples of the magic columns starting in Section 6.1.3.) The full data model represented by this migration is shown in Figure 6.2.

We can run the migration, known as “migrating up”, using the rake command (Box 2.1) as follows:

$bundle exec rake db:migrate  (You may recall that we ran this command once before, in Section 2.2.) The first time db:migrate is run, it creates a file called db/development.sqlite3, which is an SQLite5 database. We can see the structure of the database using the excellent SQLite Database Browser to open the db/development.sqlite3 file (Figure 6.3); compare with the diagram in Figure 6.2. You might note that there’s one column in Figure 6.3 not accounted for in the migration: the id column. As noted briefly in Section 2.2, this column is created automatically, and is used by Rails to identify each row uniquely. Most migrations, including all the ones in the Rails Tutorial, are reversible, which means we can “migrate down” and undo them with a single Rake task, called db:rollback: $ bundle exec rake db:rollback


(See Box 3.1 for another technique useful for reversing migrations.) Under the hood, this command executes the drop_table command to remove the users table from the database. The reason this works is that the change method knows that drop_table is the inverse of create_table, which means that the rollback migration can be easily inferred. In the case of an irreversible migration, such as one to remove a database column, it is necessary to define separate up and down methods in place of the single change method. Read about migrations in the Rails Guides for more information.

If you rolled back the database, migrate up again before proceeding:

$bundle exec rake db:migrate  ### 6.1.2 The model file We’ve seen how the User model generation in Listing 6.1 generated a migration file (Listing 6.2), and we saw in Figure 6.3 the results of running this migration: it updated a file called development.sqlite3 by creating a table users with columns id, name, email, created_at, and updated_at. Listing 6.1 also created the model itself; the rest of this section is dedicated to understanding it. We begin by looking at the code for the User model, which lives in the file user.rb inside the app/models/ directory. It is, to put it mildly, very compact (Listing 6.3). (Note: The attr_accessible line will not appear if you are using Rails 3.2.2 or earlier. In this case, you should add it in Section 6.1.2.2.) Listing 6.3. The brand new User model. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email end  Recall from Section 4.4.2 that the syntax class User < ActiveRecord::Base means that the User class inherits from ActiveRecord::Base, so that the User model automatically has all the functionality of the ActiveRecord::Base class. Of course, knowledge of this inheritance doesn’t do any good unless we know what ActiveRecord::Base contains, and we’ll get a first look momentarily. Before we move on, though, there are two tasks to complete. #### Model annotation Although it’s not strictly necessary, you might find it convenient to annotate your Rails models using the annotate gem (Listing 6.4). Listing 6.4. Adding the annotate gem to the Gemfile. source 'https://rubygems.org' . . . group :development, :test do gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5' gem 'rspec-rails', '2.11.0' end group :development do gem 'annotate', '2.5.0' end group :test do . . . end  (We place the annotate gem in a group :development block (analogous to group :test) because the annotations aren’t needed in production applications.) We next install it with bundle install: $ bundle install


This gives us a command called annotate, which simply adds comments containing the data model to the model file:

$bundle exec annotate Annotated (1): User  The results appear in Listing 6.5. Listing 6.5. The annotated User model. app/models/user.rb # == Schema Information # # Table name: users # # id :integer not null, primary key # name :string(255) # email :string(255) # created_at :datetime # updated_at :datetime # class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email end  I find that having the data model visible in the model files helps remind me which attributes the model has, but future code listings will omit the annotations for brevity. (Note that, if you want your annotations to be up-to-date, you’ll have to run annotate again any time the data model changes.) #### Accessible attributes Let’s revisit the User model, focusing now on the attr_accessible line (Listing 6.6). This line tells Rails which attributes of the model are accessible, i.e., which attributes can be modified automatically by outside users (such as users submitting requests with web browsers). Listing 6.6. Making the name and email attributes accessible. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email end  The code in Listing 6.6 doesn’t do quite what you might think. By default, all model attributes are accessible. What Listing 6.6 does is to ensure that the name and email attributes—and only the name and email attributes—are automatically accessible to outside users. We’ll see why this is important in Chapter 9: using attr_accessible is important for preventing a mass assignment vulnerability, a distressingly common and often serious security hole in many Rails applications. ### 6.1.3 Creating user objects We’ve done some good prep work, and now it’s time to cash in and learn about Active Record by playing with our newly created User model. As in Chapter 4, our tool of choice is the Rails console. Since we don’t (yet) want to make any changes to our database, we’ll start the console in a sandbox: $ rails console --sandbox
Any modifications you make will be rolled back on exit
>>


As indicated by the helpful message “Any modifications you make will be rolled back on exit”, when started in a sandbox the console will “roll back” (i.e., undo) any database changes introduced during the session.

In the console session in Section 4.4.5, we created a new user object with User.new, which we had access to only after requiring the example user file in Listing 4.9. With models, the situation is different; as you may recall from Section 4.4.4, the Rails console automatically loads the Rails environment, which includes the models. This means that we can make a new user object without any further work:

>> User.new
=> #<User id: nil, name: nil, email: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>


We see here the default console representation of a user object, which prints out the same attributes shown in Figure 6.2 and Listing 6.5.

When called with no arguments, User.new returns an object with all nil attributes. In Section 4.4.5, we designed the example User class to take an initialization hash to set the object attributes; that design choice was motivated by Active Record, which allows objects to be initialized in the same way:

>> user = User.new(name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com")
=> #<User id: nil, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>


Here we see that the name and email attributes have been set as expected.

If you’ve been tailing the development log, you may have noticed that no new lines have shown up yet. This is because calling User.new doesn’t touch the database; it simply creates a new Ruby object in memory. To save the user object to the database, we call the save method on the user variable:

>> user.save
=> true


The save method returns true if it succeeds and false otherwise. (Currently, all saves should succeed; we’ll see cases in Section 6.2 when some will fail.) As soon as you save, you should see a line in the development log with the SQL command to INSERT INTO "users". Because of the many methods supplied by Active Record, we won’t ever need raw SQL in this book, and I’ll omit discussion of the SQL commands from now on. But you can learn a lot by watching the log.

You may have noticed that the new user object had nil values for the id and the magic columns created_at and updated_at attributes. Let’s see if our save changed anything:

>> user
=> #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46", updated_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46">


We see that the id has been assigned a value of 1, while the magic columns have been assigned the current time and date.6 Currently, the created and updated timestamps are identical; we’ll see them differ in Section 6.1.5.

As with the User class in Section 4.4.5, instances of the User model allow access to their attributes using a dot notation:7

>> user.name
=> "Michael Hartl"
>> user.email
=> "mhartl@example.com"
>> user.updated_at
=> Tue, 05 Dec 2011 00:57:46 UTC +00:00


As we’ll see in Chapter 7, it’s often convenient to make and save a model in two steps as we have above, but Active Record also lets you combine them into one step with User.create:

>> User.create(name: "A Nother", email: "another@example.org")
#<User id: 2, name: "A Nother", email: "another@example.org", created_at:
"2011-12-05 01:05:24", updated_at: "2011-12-05 01:05:24">
>> foo = User.create(name: "Foo", email: "foo@bar.com")
#<User id: 3, name: "Foo", email: "foo@bar.com", created_at: "2011-12-05
01:05:42", updated_at: "2011-12-05 01:05:42">


Note that User.create, rather than returning true or false, returns the User object itself, which we can optionally assign to a variable (such as foo in the second command above).

The inverse of create is destroy:

>> foo.destroy
=> #<User id: 3, name: "Foo", email: "foo@bar.com", created_at: "2011-12-05
01:05:42", updated_at: "2011-12-05 01:05:42">


Oddly, destroy, like create, returns the object in question, though I can’t recall ever having used the return value of destroy. Even odder, perhaps, is that the destroyed object still exists in memory:

>> foo
=> #<User id: 3, name: "Foo", email: "foo@bar.com", created_at: "2011-12-05
01:05:42", updated_at: "2011-12-05 01:05:42">


How do we know if we really destroyed an object? And for saved and non-destroyed objects, how can we retrieve users from the database? It’s time to learn how to use Active Record to find user objects.

### 6.1.4 Finding user objects

Active Record provides several options for finding objects. Let’s use them to find the first user we created while verifying that the third user (foo) has been destroyed. We’ll start with the existing user:

>> User.find(1)
=> #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46", updated_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46">


Here we’ve passed the id of the user to User.find; Active Record returns the user with that id.

Let’s see if the user with an id of 3 still exists in the database:

>> User.find(3)
ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound: Couldn't find User with ID=3


Since we destroyed our third user in Section 6.1.3, Active Record can’t find it in the database. Instead, find raises an exception, which is a way of indicating an exceptional event in the execution of a program—in this case, a nonexistent Active Record id, which causes find to raise an ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound exception.8

In addition to the generic find, Active Record also allows us to find users by specific attributes:

>> User.find_by_email("mhartl@example.com")
=> #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46", updated_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46">


The find_by_email method is automatically created by Active Record based on the email attribute in the users table. (As you might guess, Active Record creates a find_by_name method as well.) Since we will be using email addresses as usernames, this sort of find will be useful when we learn how to let users sign in to our site (Chapter 7). If you’re worried that find_by_email will be inefficient if there are a large number of users, you’re ahead of the game; we’ll cover this issue, and its solution via database indices, in Section 6.2.5.

We’ll end with a couple of more general ways of finding users. First, there’s first:

>> User.first
=> #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46", updated_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46">


Naturally, first just returns the first user in the database. There’s also all:

>> User.all
=> [#<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46", updated_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46">,
#<User id: 2, name: "A Nother", email: "another@example.org", created_at:
"2011-12-05 01:05:24", updated_at: "2011-12-05 01:05:24">]


No prizes for inferring that all returns an array (Section 4.3.1) of all users in the database.

### 6.1.5 Updating user objects

Once we’ve created objects, we often want to update them. There are two basic ways to do this. First, we can assign attributes individually, as we did in Section 4.4.5:

>> user           # Just a reminder about our user's attributes
=> #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com",
created_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46", updated_at: "2011-12-05 00:57:46">
>> user.email = "mhartl@example.net"
=> "mhartl@example.net"
>> user.save
=> true


Note that the final step is necessary to write the changes to the database. We can see what happens without a save by using reload, which reloads the object based on the database information:

>> user.email
=> "mhartl@example.net"
>> user.email = "foo@bar.com"
=> "foo@bar.com"
=> "mhartl@example.net"


Now that we’ve updated the user by running user.save, the magic columns differ, as promised in Section 6.1.3:

>> user.created_at
=> "2011-12-05 00:57:46"
>> user.updated_at
=> "2011-12-05 01:37:32"


The second way to update attributes is to use update_attributes:

>> user.update_attributes(name: "The Dude", email: "dude@abides.org")
=> true
>> user.name
=> "The Dude"
>> user.email
=> "dude@abides.org"


The update_attributes method accepts a hash of attributes, and on success performs both the update and the save in one step (returning true to indicate that the save went through). It’s worth noting that, once you have defined some attributes as accessible using attr_accessible (Section 6.1.2.2), only those attributes can be modified using update_attributes. If you ever find that your models mysteriously start refusing to update certain columns, check to make sure that those columns are included in the call to attr_accessible.

## 6.2 User validations

The User model we created in Section 6.1 now has working name and email attributes, but they are completely generic: any string (including an empty one) is currently valid in either case. And yet, names and email addresses are more specific than this. For example, name should be non-blank, and email should match the specific format characteristic of email addresses. Moreover, since we’ll be using email addresses as unique usernames when users sign in, we shouldn’t allow email duplicates in the database.

In short, we shouldn’t allow name and email to be just any strings; we should enforce certain constraints on their values. Active Record allows us to impose such constraints using validations. In this section, we’ll cover several of the most common cases, validating presence, length, format and uniqueness. In Section 6.3.4 we’ll add a final common validation, confirmation. And we’ll see in Section 7.3 how validations give us convenient error messages when users make submissions that violate them.

### 6.2.1 Initial user tests

As with the other features of our sample app, we’ll add User model validations using test-driven development. Because we didn’t pass the

--no-test-framework

flag when we generated the User model (unlike, e.g., Listing 5.28), the command in Listing 6.1 produces an initial spec for testing users, but in this case it’s practically blank (Listing 6.7).

Listing 6.7. The practically blank default User spec.
spec/models/user_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe User do
pending "add some examples to (or delete) #{__FILE__}"
end


This simply uses the pending method to indicate that we should fill the spec with something useful. We can see its effect by running the User model spec:

$bundle exec rspec spec/models/user_spec.rb * Finished in 0.01999 seconds 1 example, 0 failures, 1 pending Pending: User add some examples to (or delete) /Users/mhartl/rails_projects/sample_app/spec/models/user_spec.rb (Not Yet Implemented)  On many systems, pending specs will be displayed in yellow to indicate that they are in between passing (green) and failing (red). We’ll follow the advice of the default spec by filling it in with some RSpec examples, shown in Listing 6.8. Listing 6.8. Testing for the :name and :email attributes. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before { @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") } subject { @user } it { should respond_to(:name) } it { should respond_to(:email) } end  The before block, which we saw in Listing 5.27), runs the code inside the block before each example—in this case, creating a new @user instance variable using User.new and a valid initialization hash. Then subject { @user }  makes @user the default subject of the test example, as seen before in the context of the page variable in Section 5.3.4. The two examples in Listing 6.8 test for the existence of name and email attributes: it { should respond_to(:name) } it { should respond_to(:email) }  These examples implicitly use the Ruby method respond_to?, which accepts a symbol and returns true if the object responds to the given method or attribute and false otherwise: $ rails console --sandbox
>> user = User.new
>> user.respond_to?(:name)
=> true
>> user.respond_to?(:foobar)
=> false


(Recall from Section 4.2.3 that Ruby uses a question mark to indicate such true/false boolean methods.) The tests themselves rely on the boolean convention used by RSpec: the code

@user.respond_to?(:name)


can be tested using the RSpec code

@user.should respond_to(:name)


Because of subject { @user }, we can leave off @user in the test, yielding

it { should respond_to(:name) }


These kinds of tests allow us to use TDD to add new attributes and methods to our User model, and as a side-effect we get a nice specification for the methods that all User objects should respond to.

You should verify at this point that the tests fail:

$bundle exec rspec spec/  Even though we created a development database with rake db:migrate in Section 6.1.1, the tests fail because the test database doesn’t yet know about the data model (indeed, it doesn’t yet exist at all). We can create a test database with the correct structure, and thereby get the tests to pass, using the db:test:prepare Rake task: $ bundle exec rake db:test:prepare


This just ensures that the data model from the development database, db/development.sqlite3, is reflected in the test database, db/test.sqlite3. Failure to run this Rake task after a migration is a common source of confusion. In addition, sometimes the test database gets corrupted and needs to be reset. If your test suite is mysteriously breaking, be sure to try running rake db:test:prepare to see if that fixes the problem.

### 6.2.2 Validating presence

Perhaps the most elementary validation is presence, which simply verifies that a given attribute is present. For example, in this section we’ll ensure that both the name and email fields are present before a user gets saved to the database. In Section 7.3.2, we’ll see how to propagate this requirement up to the signup form for creating new users.

We’ll start with a test for the presence of a name attribute. Although the first step in TDD is to write a failing test (Section 3.2.1), in this case we don’t yet know enough about validations to write the proper test, so we’ll write the validation first, using the console to understand it. Then we’ll comment out the validation, write a failing test, and verify that uncommenting the validation gets the test to pass. This procedure may seem pedantic for such a simple test, but I have seen many “simple” tests that actually test the wrong thing; being meticulous about TDD is simply the only way to be confident that we’re testing the right thing. (This comment-out technique is also useful when rescuing an application whose application code is already written but—quelle horreur!—has no tests.)

The way to validate the presence of the name attribute is to use the validates method with argument presence: true, as shown in Listing 6.9. The presence: true argument is a one-element options hash; recall from Section 4.3.4 that curly braces are optional when passing hashes as the final argument in a method. (As noted in Section 5.1.1, the use of options hashes is a recurring theme in Rails.)

Listing 6.9. Validating the presence of a name attribute.
app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name, :email

validates :name, presence: true
end


Listing 6.9 may look like magic, but validates is just a method, as indeed is attr_accessible. An equivalent formulation of Listing 6.9 using parentheses is as follows:

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible(:name, :email)

validates(:name, presence: true)
end


Let’s drop into the console to see the effects of adding a validation to our User model:9

$rails console --sandbox >> user = User.new(name: "", email: "mhartl@example.com") >> user.save => false >> user.valid? => false  Here user.save returns false, indicating a failed save. In the final command, we use the valid? method, which returns false when the object fails one or more validations, and true when all validations pass. In this case, we only have one validation, so we know which one failed, but it can still be helpful to check using the errors object generated on failure: >> user.errors.full_messages => ["Name can't be blank"]  (The error message is a hint that Rails validates the presence of an attribute using the blank? method, which we saw at the end of Section 4.4.3.) Now for the failing test. To ensure that our incipient test will fail, let’s comment out the validation at this point (Listing 6.10). Listing 6.10. Commenting out a validation to ensure a failing test. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email # validates :name, presence: true end  The initial validation tests then appear as in Listing 6.11. Listing 6.11. A failing test for validation of the name attribute. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") end subject { @user } it { should respond_to(:name) } it { should respond_to(:email) } it { should be_valid } describe "when name is not present" do before { @user.name = " " } it { should_not be_valid } end end  The first new example is just a sanity check, verifying that the @user object is initially valid: it { should be_valid }  This is another example of the RSpec boolean convention we saw in Section 6.2.1: whenever an object responds to a boolean method foo?, there is a corresponding test method called be_foo. In this case, we can test the result of calling @user.valid?  with @user.should be_valid  As before, subject { @user } lets us leave off @user, yielding it { should be_valid }  The second test first sets the user’s name to an invalid (blank) value, and then tests to see that the resulting @user object is invalid: describe "when name is not present" do before { @user.name = " " } it { should_not be_valid } end  This uses a before block to set the user’s name to an invalid (blank) value and then checks that the resulting user object is not valid. You should verify that the tests fail at this point: $ bundle exec rspec spec/models/user_spec.rb
...F
4 examples, 1 failure


Now uncomment the validation (i.e., revert Listing 6.10 back to Listing 6.9) to get the tests to pass:

$bundle exec rspec spec/models/user_spec.rb .... 4 examples, 0 failures  Of course, we also want to validate the presence of email addresses. The test (Listing 6.12) is analogous to the one for the name attribute. Listing 6.12. A test for presence of the email attribute. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") end . . . describe "when email is not present" do before { @user.email = " " } it { should_not be_valid } end end  The implementation is also virtually the same, as seen in Listing 6.13. Listing 6.13. Validating the presence of the name and email attributes. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email validates :name, presence: true validates :email, presence: true end  Now all the tests should pass, and the presence validations are complete. ### 6.2.3 Length validation We’ve constrained our User model to require a name for each user, but we should go further: the user’s names will be displayed on the sample site, so we should enforce some limit on their length. With all the work we did in Section 6.2.2, this step is easy. We start with a test. There’s no science to picking a maximum length; we’ll just pull 50 out of thin air as a reasonable upper bound, which means verifying that names of 51 characters are too long (Listing 6.14). Listing 6.14. A test for name length validation. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") end . . . describe "when name is too long" do before { @user.name = "a" * 51 } it { should_not be_valid } end end  For convenience, we’ve used “string multiplication” in Listing 6.14 to make a string 51 characters long. We can see how this works using the console: >> "a" * 51 => "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" >> ("a" * 51).length => 51  The test in Listing 6.14 should fail. To get it to pass, we need to know about the validation argument to constrain length, :length, along with the :maximum parameter to enforce the upper bound (Listing 6.15). Listing 6.15. Adding a length validation for the name attribute. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email validates :name, presence: true, length: { maximum: 50 } validates :email, presence: true end  Now the tests should pass. With our test suite passing again, we can move on to a more challenging validation: email format. ### 6.2.4 Format validation Our validations for the name attribute enforce only minimal constraints—any non-blank name under 51 characters will do—but of course the email attribute must satisfy more stringent requirements. So far we’ve only rejected blank email addresses; in this section, we’ll require email addresses to conform to the familiar pattern user@example.com. Neither the tests nor the validation will be exhaustive, just good enough to accept most valid email addresses and reject most invalid ones. We’ll start with a couple tests involving collections of valid and invalid addresses. To make these collections, it’s worth knowing about the useful %w[] technique for making arrays of strings, as seen in this console session: >> %w[foo bar baz] => ["foo", "bar", "baz"] >> addresses = %w[user@foo.COM THE_US-ER@foo.bar.org first.last@foo.jp] => ["user@foo.COM", "THE_US-ER@foo.bar.org", "first.last@foo.jp"] >> addresses.each do |address| ?> puts address >> end user@foo.COM THE_US-ER@foo.bar.org first.last@foo.jp  Here we’ve iterated over the elements of the addresses array using the each method (Section 4.3.2). With this technique in hand, we’re ready to write some basic email format validation tests (Listing 6.16). Listing 6.16. Tests for email format validation. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") end . . . describe "when email format is invalid" do it "should be invalid" do addresses = %w[user@foo,com user_at_foo.org example.user@foo. foo@bar_baz.com foo@bar+baz.com] addresses.each do |invalid_address| @user.email = invalid_address @user.should_not be_valid end end end describe "when email format is valid" do it "should be valid" do addresses = %w[user@foo.COM A_US-ER@f.b.org frst.lst@foo.jp a+b@baz.cn] addresses.each do |valid_address| @user.email = valid_address @user.should be_valid end end end end  As noted above, these are far from exhaustive, but we do check the common valid email forms user@foo.COM, THE_US-ER@foo.bar.org  (uppercase, underscores, and compound domains), and first.last@foo.jp (the standard corporate username first.last, with a two-letter top-level domain jp), along with several invalid forms. The application code for email format validation uses a regular expression (or regex) to define the format, along with the :format argument to the validates method (Listing 6.17). Listing 6.17. Validating the email format with a regular expression. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email validates :name, presence: true, length: { maximum: 50 } VALID_EMAIL_REGEX = /\A[\w+\-.]+@[a-z\d\-.]+\.[a-z]+\z/i validates :email, presence: true, format: { with: VALID_EMAIL_REGEX } end  Here the regex VALID_EMAIL_REGEX is a constant, indicated in Ruby by a name starting with a capital letter. The code  VALID_EMAIL_REGEX = /\A[\w+\-.]+@[a-z\d\-.]+\.[a-z]+\z/i validates :email, presence: true, format: { with: VALID_EMAIL_REGEX }  ensures that only email addresses that match the pattern will be considered valid. So, where does the pattern come from? Regular expressions consist of a terse (some would say unreadable) language for matching text patterns; learning to construct regexes is an art, and to get you started I’ve broken VALID_EMAIL_REGEX into bite-sized pieces (Table 6.1).10 To really learn about regular expressions, though, I consider the amazing Rubular regular expression editor (Figure 6.4) to be simply essential.11 The Rubular website has a beautiful interactive interface for making regular expressions, along with a handy regex quick reference. I encourage you to study Table 6.1 with a browser window open to Rubular—no amount of reading about regular expressions can replace a couple of hours playing with Rubular. (Note: If you use the regex from Listing 6.17 in Rubular, you should leave off the \A and \z characters.) ExpressionMeaning /\A[\w+\-.]+@[a-z\d\-.]+\.[a-z]+\z/ifull regex /start of regex \Amatch start of a string [\w+\-.]+at least one word character, plus, hyphen, or dot @literal “at sign” [a-z\d\-.]+at least one letter, digit, hyphen, or dot \.literal dot [a-z]+at least one letter \zmatch end of a string /end of regex icase insensitive Table 6.1: Breaking down the email regex from Listing 6.17. By the way, there actually exists a full regex for matching email addresses according to the official standard, but it’s really not worth the trouble. The one in Listing 6.17 is fine, maybe even better than the official one.12 The tests should all be passing now. (In fact, the tests for valid email addresses should have been passing all along; since regexes are notoriously error-prone, the valid email tests are there mainly as a sanity check on VALID_EMAIL_REGEX.) This means that there’s only one constraint left: enforcing the email addresses to be unique. ### 6.2.5 Uniqueness validation To enforce uniqueness of email addresses (so that we can use them as usernames), we’ll be using the :unique option to the validates method. But be warned: there’s a major caveat, so don’t just skim this section—read it carefully. We’ll start, as usual, with our tests. In our previous model tests, we’ve mainly used User.new, which just creates a Ruby object in memory, but for uniqueness tests we actually need to put a record into the database.13 The (first) duplicate email test appears in Listing 6.18. Listing 6.18. A test for the rejection of duplicate email addresses. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") end . . . describe "when email address is already taken" do before do user_with_same_email = @user.dup user_with_same_email.save end it { should_not be_valid } end end  The method here is to make a user with the same email address as @user, which we accomplish using @user.dup, which creates a duplicate user with the same attributes. Since we then save that user, the original @user has an email address that already exists in the database, and hence should not be valid. We can get the new test in Listing 6.18 to pass with the code in Listing 6.19. Listing 6.19. Validating the uniqueness of email addresses. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base . . . validates :email, presence: true, format: { with: VALID_EMAIL_REGEX }, uniqueness: true end  We’re not quite done, though. Email addresses are typically processed as if they were case-insensitive—i.e., foo@bar.com is treated the same as FOO@BAR.COM or FoO@BAr.coM—so our validation should incorporate this as well.14 We test for case-insensitivity with the code in Listing 6.20. Listing 6.20. A test for the rejection of duplicate email addresses, insensitive to case. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com") end . . . describe "when email address is already taken" do before do user_with_same_email = @user.dup user_with_same_email.email = @user.email.upcase user_with_same_email.save end it { should_not be_valid } end end  Here we are using the upcase method on strings (seen briefly in Section 4.3.2). This test does the same thing as the first duplicate email test, but with an upper-case email address instead. If this test feels a little abstract, go ahead and fire up the console: $ rails console --sandbox
>> user = User.create(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com")
>> user.email.upcase
=> "USER@EXAMPLE.COM"
>> user_with_same_email = user.dup
>> user_with_same_email.email = user.email.upcase
>> user_with_same_email.valid?
=> true


Of course, user_with_same_email.valid? is true, because the uniqueness validation is currently case-sensitive, but we want it to be false. Fortunately, :uniqueness accepts an option, :case_sensitive, for just this purpose (Listing 6.21).

Listing 6.21. Validating the uniqueness of email addresses, ignoring case.
app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
.
.
.
validates :email, presence: true, format: { with: VALID_EMAIL_REGEX },
uniqueness: { case_sensitive: false }
end


Note that we have simply replaced true with case_sensitive: false; Rails infers in this case that :uniqueness should be true. At this point, our application—with an important caveat—enforces email uniqueness, and our test suite should pass.

#### The uniqueness caveat

There’s just one small problem, the caveat alluded to above:

Using validates :uniqueness does not guarantee uniqueness.

D’oh! But what can go wrong? Here’s what:

1. Alice signs up for the sample app, with address alice@wonderland.com.
2. Alice accidentally clicks on “Submit” twice, sending two requests in quick succession.
3. The following sequence occurs: request 1 creates a user in memory that passes validation, request 2 does the same, request 1’s user gets saved, request 2’s user gets saved.
4. Result: two user records with the exact same email address, despite the uniqueness validation.

If the above sequence seems implausible, believe me, it isn’t: it can happen on any Rails website with significant traffic. Luckily, the solution is straightforward to implement; we just need to enforce uniqueness at the database level as well. Our method is to create a database index on the email column, and then require that the index be unique.

The email index represents an update to our data modeling requirements, which (as discussed in Section 6.1.1) is handled in Rails using migrations. We saw in Section 6.1.1 that generating the User model automatically created a new migration (Listing 6.2); in the present case, we are adding structure to an existing model, so we need to create a migration directly using the migration generator:

$rails generate migration add_index_to_users_email  Unlike the migration for users, the email uniqueness migration is not pre-defined, so we need to fill in its contents with Listing 6.22.15 Listing 6.22. The migration for enforcing email uniqueness. db/migrate/[timestamp]_add_index_to_users_email.rb class AddIndexToUsersEmail < ActiveRecord::Migration def change add_index :users, :email, unique: true end end  This uses a Rails method called add_index to add an index on the email column of the users table. The index by itself doesn’t enforce uniqueness, but the option unique: true does. The final step is to migrate the database: $ bundle exec rake db:migrate


(If this fails, try exiting any running sandbox console sessions, which can lock the database and prevent migrations.) If you’re interested in seeing the practical effect of this, take a look at the file db/schema.rb, which should now include a line like this:

add_index "users", ["email"], :name => "index_users_on_email", :unique => true


Unfortunately, there’s one more change we need to make to be assured of email uniqueness, which is to make sure that the email address is all lower-case before it gets saved to the database. The reason is that not all database adapters use case-sensitive indices.16 The way to do this is with a callback, which is a method that gets invoked at a particular point in the lifetime of an Active Record object (see the Rails API entry on callbacks). In the present case, we’ll use a before_save callback to force Rails to downcase the email attribute before saving the user to the database, as shown in Listing 6.23.

Listing 6.23. Ensuring email uniqueness by downcasing the email attribute.
app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name, :email

before_save { |user| user.email = email.downcase }
.
.
.
end


The code in Listing 6.23 passes a block to the before_save callback and sets the user’s email address to a lower-case version of its current value using the downcase string method. This code is a little advanced, and at this point I suggest you simply trust that it works; if you’re skeptical, comment out the uniqueness validation from Listing 6.19 and try to create users with identical email addresses to see the error that results. (We’ll see this technique again in Section 8.2.1.)

Now the Alice scenario above will work fine: the database will save a user record based on the first request, and will reject the second save for violating the uniqueness constraint. (An error will appear in the Rails log, but that doesn’t do any harm. You can actually catch the ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid exception that gets raised—see Insoshi for an example—but in this tutorial we won’t bother with this step.) Adding this index on the email attribute accomplishes a second goal, alluded to briefly in Section 6.1.4: it fixes an efficiency problem in find_by_email (Box 6.2).

In this section, we’ll add the last of the basic User attributes: a secure password used to authenticate users of the sample application. The method is to require each user to have a password (with a password confirmation), and then store an encrypted version of the password in the database. We’ll also add a way to authenticate a user based on a given password, a method we’ll use in Chapter 8 to allow users to sign in to the site.

The method for authenticating users will be to take a submitted password, encrypt it, and compare the result to the encrypted value stored in the database. If the two match, then the submitted password is correct and the user is authenticated. By comparing encrypted values instead of raw passwords, we will be able to authenticate users without storing the passwords themselves. This means that, even if our database is compromised, our users’ passwords will still be secure.

Much of the secure password machinery will be implemented using a single Rails method called has_secure_password (first introduced in Rails 3.1). Because so much of what follows depends on this one method, it is difficult to develop secure passwords incrementally. As a result, starting in Section 6.3.2, we’ll write a large number of tests before getting any of them to pass. If you start getting bogged down, I recommend staying patient and pushing through, because there is a great payoff in Section 6.3.4. (Since screencasts allow for a more incremental development approach, interested readers should consider the Ruby on Rails Tutorial screencasts for a fuller understanding of this material.)

We’ll start with the necessary change to the data model for users, which involves adding a password_digest column to the users table (Figure 6.5). The name digest comes from the terminology of cryptographic hash functions, and the exact name password_digest is necessary for the implementation in Section 6.3.4 to work. By encrypting the password properly, we’ll ensure that an attacker won’t be able to sign in to the site even if they manage to obtain a copy of the database.

We’ll use the state-of-the-art hash function called bcrypt to irreversibly encrypt the password to form the password hash. To use bcrypt in the sample application, we need to add the bcrypt-ruby gem to our Gemfile (Listing 6.24).

Listing 6.24. Adding bcrypt-ruby to the Gemfile.
source 'https://rubygems.org'

gem 'rails', '3.2.15'
gem 'bootstrap-sass', '2.1'
gem 'bcrypt-ruby', '3.0.1'
.
.
.


Then run bundle install:

$bundle install  On some systems, you may get the warning make: /usr/bin/gcc-4.2: No such file or directory  To fix this, reinstall RVM using the clang flag: $ rvm reinstall 1.9.3 --with-gcc=clang


Since we want users to have a password digest column, a user object should respond to password_digest, which suggests the test shown in Listing 6.25.

Listing 6.25. Ensuring that a User object has a password_digest column.
spec/models/user_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe User do

before do
@user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com")
end

subject { @user }

it { should respond_to(:name) }
it { should respond_to(:email) }
.
.
.
end


To get the test to pass, we first generate an appropriate migration for the password_digest column:

$rails generate migration add_password_digest_to_users password_digest:string  Here the first argument is the migration name, and we’ve also supplied a second argument with the name and type of attribute we want to create. (Compare this to the original generation of the users table in Listing 6.1.) We can choose any migration name we want, but it’s convenient to end the name with _to_users, since in this case Rails automatically constructs a migration to add columns to the users table. Moreover, by including the second argument, we’ve given Rails enough information to construct the entire migration for us, as seen in Listing 6.26. Listing 6.26. The migration to add a password_digest column to the users table. db/migrate/[ts]_add_password_digest_to_users.rb class AddPasswordDigestToUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration def change add_column :users, :password_digest, :string end end  This code uses the add_column method to add a password_digest column to the users table. We can get the failing test from Listing 6.25 to pass by migrating the development database and preparing the test database: $ bundle exec rake db:migrate
$bundle exec rake db:test:prepare$ bundle exec rspec spec/


As seen in the mockup in Figure 6.1, we expect to have users confirm their passwords, a common practice on the web meant to minimize typos. We could enforce this at the controller layer, but it’s conventional to put it in the model and use Active Record to enforce the constraint. The method is to add password and password_confirmation attributes to the User model, and then require that the two attributes match before the record is saved to the database. Unlike the other attributes we’ve seen so far, the password attributes will be virtual—they will only exist temporarily in memory, and will not be persisted to the database. As we’ll see in Section 6.3.4, these virtual attributes are implemented automatically by has_secure_password.

We’ll start with respond_to tests for a password and its confirmation, as seen in Listing 6.27.

Listing 6.27. Testing for the password and password_confirmation attributes.
spec/models/user_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe User do

before do
@user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com",
end

subject { @user }

it { should respond_to(:name) }
it { should respond_to(:email) }

it { should be_valid }
.
.
.
end


Note that we’ve added :password and :password_confirmation to the initialization hash for User.new:

before do
@user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com",
end


We definitely don’t want users to enter a blank password, so we’ll add another test to validate password presence:

describe "when password is not present" do
it { should_not be_valid }
end


Since we’ll be testing password mismatch in a moment, here we make sure to test the presence validation by setting both the password and its confirmation to a blank string. This uses Ruby’s ability to make more than one assignment in a line. For example, in the console we can set both a and b to 3 as follows:

>> a = b = 3
>> a
=> 3
>> b
=> 3


In the present case, we use it to set both password attributes to " ":

@user.password = @user.password_confirmation = " "


We also want to ensure that the password and confirmation match. The case where they do match is already covered by it { should be_valid }, so we only need to test the case of a mismatch:

describe "when password doesn't match confirmation" do
before { @user.password_confirmation = "mismatch" }
it { should_not be_valid }
end


In principle, we are now done, but there is one case that doesn’t quite work. What if the password confirmation is blank? If it is empty or consists of whitespace but the password is valid, then the two don’t match and the confirmation validation will catch it. If both the password and its confirmation are empty or consist of whitespace, then the password presence validation will catch it. Unfortunately, there’s one more possibility, which is that the password confirmation is nil. This can never happen through the web, but it can at the console:

$rails console >> User.create(name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com", ?> password: "foobar", password_confirmation: nil)  When the confirmation is nil, Rails doesn’t run the confirmation validation, which means that we can create users at the console without password confirmations. (Of course, right now we haven’t added the validations yet, so the code above will work in any case.) To prevent this, we’ll add a test to catch this case: describe "when password confirmation is nil" do before { @user.password_confirmation = nil } it { should_not be_valid } end  (This behavior strikes me as a minor bug in Rails, and perhaps it will be fixed in a future version, and in any case adding the validation does no harm.) Putting everything together gives the (failing) tests in Listing 6.28. As noted in the introduction to this section, it is difficult to develop secure passwords incrementally due to the large number of features encapsulated in has_secure_password, so at this point all of these new tests fail. We’ll get them to pass in Section 6.3.4. Listing 6.28. Test for the password and password confirmation. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com", password: "foobar", password_confirmation: "foobar") end subject { @user } it { should respond_to(:name) } it { should respond_to(:email) } it { should respond_to(:password_digest) } it { should respond_to(:password) } it { should respond_to(:password_confirmation) } it { should be_valid } . . . describe "when password is not present" do before { @user.password = @user.password_confirmation = " " } it { should_not be_valid } end describe "when password doesn't match confirmation" do before { @user.password_confirmation = "mismatch" } it { should_not be_valid } end describe "when password confirmation is nil" do before { @user.password_confirmation = nil } it { should_not be_valid } end end  ### 6.3.3 User authentication The final piece of our password machinery is a method to retrieve users based on their email and passwords. This divides naturally into two parts: first, find a user by email address; second, authenticate the user with a given password. The first step is simple; as we saw in Section 6.1.4, we can find a user with a given email address using the find_by_email method: user = User.find_by_email(email)  The second step is then to use an authenticate method to verify that the user has the given password. In Chapter 8, we’ll retrieve the current (signed-in) user using code something like this: current_user = user.authenticate(password)  If the given password matches the user’s password, it should return the user; otherwise, it should return false. As usual, we can express the requirement for authenticate using RSpec. The resulting tests are more advanced than the others we’ve seen, so let’s break them down into pieces; if you’re new to RSpec, you might want to read this section a couple of times. We start by requiring a User object to respond to authenticate: it { should respond_to(:authenticate) }  We then cover the two cases of password match and mismatch: describe "return value of authenticate method" do before { @user.save } let(:found_user) { User.find_by_email(@user.email) } describe "with valid password" do it { should == found_user.authenticate(@user.password) } end describe "with invalid password" do let(:user_for_invalid_password) { found_user.authenticate("invalid") } it { should_not == user_for_invalid_password } specify { user_for_invalid_password.should be_false } end end  The before block saves the user to the database so that it can be retrieved using find_by_email, which we accomplish using the let method: let(:found_user) { User.find_by_email(@user.email) }  We’ve used let in a couple of exercises, but this is the first time we’ve seen it in the body of the tutorial. Box 6.3 covers let in more detail. The two describe blocks cover the case where @user and found_user should be the same (password match) and different (password mismatch); they use the “double equals” == test for object equivalence (Section 4.3.1). Note that the tests in describe "with invalid password" do let(:user_for_invalid_password) { found_user.authenticate("invalid") } it { should_not == user_for_invalid_password } specify { user_for_invalid_password.should be_false } end  use let a second time, and also use the specify method. This is just a synonym for it, and can be used when writing it would sound unnatural. In this case, it sounds good to say “it [i.e., the user] should not equal wrong user”, but it sounds strange to say “user: user with invalid password should be false”; saying “specify: user with invalid password should be false” sounds better. Finally, as a security precaution, we’ll test for a length validation on passwords, requiring that they be at least six characters long: describe "with a password that's too short" do before { @user.password = @user.password_confirmation = "a" * 5 } it { should be_invalid } end  Putting together all the tests above gives Listing 6.29. Listing 6.29. Test for the authenticate method. spec/models/user_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe User do before do @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com", password: "foobar", password_confirmation: "foobar") end subject { @user } . . . it { should respond_to(:authenticate) } . . . describe "with a password that's too short" do before { @user.password = @user.password_confirmation = "a" * 5 } it { should be_invalid } end describe "return value of authenticate method" do before { @user.save } let(:found_user) { User.find_by_email(@user.email) } describe "with valid password" do it { should == found_user.authenticate(@user.password) } end describe "with invalid password" do let(:user_for_invalid_password) { found_user.authenticate("invalid") } it { should_not == user_for_invalid_password } specify { user_for_invalid_password.should be_false } end end end  As noted in Box 6.3, let memoizes its value, so that the first nested describe block in Listing 6.29 invokes let to retrieve the user from the database using find_by_email, but the second describe block doesn’t hit the database a second time. ### 6.3.4 User has secure password In previous versions of Rails, adding a secure password was difficult and time-consuming, as seen in the Rails 3.0 version of the Rails Tutorial,17 which covers the creation of an authentication system from scratch. But web developers’ understanding of how best to authenticate users has matured enough that it now comes bundled with the latest version of Rails. As a result, we’ll complete the implementation of secure passwords (and get to a green test suite) using only a few lines of code. First, we need to make the password and password_confirmation columns accessible (Section 6.1.2.2) so that we can instantiate new users with an initialization hash: @user = User.new(name: "Example User", email: "user@example.com", password: "foobar", password_confirmation: "foobar")  Following the model in Listing 6.6, we do this by adding the appropriate symbols to the list of accessible attributes: attr_accessible :name, :email, :password, :password_confirmation  Second, we need presence and length validations for the password, the latter of which uses the :minimum key in analogy with the :maximum key from Listing 6.15: validates :password, presence: true, length: { minimum: 6 }  Next, we need to add password and password_confirmation attributes, require the presence of the password, require that they match, and add an authenticate method to compare an encrypted password to the password_digest to authenticate users. This is the only nontrivial step, and in the latest version of Rails all these features come for free with one method, has_secure_password: has_secure_password  As long as there is a password_digest column in the database, adding this one method to our model gives us a secure way to create and authenticate new users. (If you’d like to see how has_secure_password is implemented, I suggest taking a look at the source code for secure_password.rb, which is well-documented and quite readable. That code includes the line validates_confirmation_of :password  which (as described in the Rails API) automagically creates an attribute called password_confirmation. It also includes a validation for the password_digest attribute; in Chapter 7, we’ll see that this is a mixed blessing.) Finally, we need a presence validation for the password confirmation: validates :password_confirmation, presence: true  Putting these three elements together yields the User model shown in Listing 6.30, which completes the implementation of secure passwords. Listing 6.30. The complete implementation for secure passwords. app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :name, :email, :password, :password_confirmation has_secure_password before_save { |user| user.email = email.downcase } validates :name, presence: true, length: { maximum: 50 } VALID_EMAIL_REGEX = /\A[\w+\-.]+@[a-z\d\-.]+\.[a-z]+\z/i validates :email, presence: true, format: { with: VALID_EMAIL_REGEX }, uniqueness: { case_sensitive: false } validates :password, presence: true, length: { minimum: 6 } validates :password_confirmation, presence: true end  You should confirm at this point that the test suite passes: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


Note: If you get a deprecation warning like

[deprecated] I18n.enforce_available_locales will default to true in the future


you can can get rid of it by editing config/application.rb as follows:

require File.expand_path('../boot', __FILE__)
.
.
.
module SampleApp
class Application < Rails::Application
.
.
.
I18n.enforce_available_locales = true
.
.
.
end
end


### 6.3.5 Creating a user

Now that the basic User model is complete, we’ll create a user in the database as preparation for making a page to show the user’s information in Section 7.1. This also gives us a chance to make the work from the previous sections feel more concrete; merely getting the test suite to pass may seem anti-climactic, and it will be gratifying to see an actual user record in the development database.

Since we can’t yet sign up through the web—that’s the goal of Chapter 7—we’ll use the Rails console to create a new user by hand. In contrast to Section 6.1.3, in this section we’ll take care not to start in a sandbox, since this time the whole point is to save a record to the database:

$rails console >> User.create(name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com", ?> password: "foobar", password_confirmation: "foobar") => #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com", created_at: "2011-12-07 03:38:14", updated_at: "2011-12-07 03:38:14", password_digest: "$2a$10$P9OnzpdCON80yuMVk3jGr.LMA16VwOExJgjlw0G4f21y...">


To check that this worked, let’s look at the row in the development database (db/development.sqlite3) using the SQLite Database Browser (Figure 6.6). Note that the columns correspond to the attributes of the data model defined in Figure 6.5.

Returning to the console, we can see the effect of has_secure_password from Listing 6.30 by looking at the password_digest attribute:

>> user = User.find_by_email("mhartl@example.com")
=> "$2a$10$P9OnzpdCON80yuMVk3jGr.LMA16VwOExJgjlw0G4f21yZIMSH/xoy"  This is the encrypted version of the password ("foobar") used to initialize the user object. We can also verify that the authenticate command is working by first using an invalid password and then a valid one: >> user.authenticate("invalid") => false >> user.authenticate("foobar") => #<User id: 1, name: "Michael Hartl", email: "mhartl@example.com", created_at: "2011-12-07 03:38:14", updated_at: "2011-12-07 03:38:14", password_digest: "$2a$10$P9OnzpdCON80yuMVk3jGr.LMA16VwOExJgjlw0G4f21y...">


As required, authenticate returns false if the password is invalid and the user itself if the password is valid.

## 6.4 Conclusion

Starting from scratch, in this chapter we created a working User model with name, email, and various password attributes, together with validations enforcing several important constraints on their values. In addition, we can securely authenticate users using a given password. In previous versions of Rails, such a feat would have taken more than twice as much code, but because of the compact validates method and has_secure_password, we were able to build a complete User model in only ten source lines of code.

In the next chapter, Chapter 7, we’ll make a working signup form to create new users, together with a page to display each user’s information. In Chapter 8, we’ll use the authentication machinery from Section 6.3 to let users sign into the site.

If you’re using Git, now would be a good time to commit if you haven’t done so in a while:

$git add .$ git commit -m "Make a basic User model (including secure passwords)"


Then merge back into the master branch:

$git checkout master$ git merge modeling-users


## 6.5 Exercises

1. Add a test for the email downcasing from Listing 6.23, as shown in Listing 6.31. By commenting out the before_save line, verify that Listing 6.31 tests the right thing.
2. By running the test suite, verify that the before_save callback can be written as shown in Listing 6.32.
3. Read through the Rails API entry for ActiveRecord::Base to get a sense of its capabilities.
4. Study the entry in the Rails API for the validates method to learn more about its capabilities and options.
5. Spend a couple of hours playing with Rubular.
Listing 6.31. A test for the email downcasing from Listing 6.23.
spec/models/user_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe User do
.
.
.
describe "email address with mixed case" do
let(:mixed_case_email) { "Foo@ExAMPle.CoM" }

it "should be saved as all lower-case" do
@user.email = mixed_case_email
@user.save
end
end
.
.
.
end

Listing 6.32. An alternate implementation of the before_save callback.
app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base

before_save { email.downcase! }
.
.
.
end

1. The name comes from the “active record pattern”, identified and named in Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture by Martin Fowler.
2. Pronounced “ess-cue-ell”, though the alternate pronunciation “sequel” is also common.
3. By using an email address as the username, we open the theoretical possibility of communicating with our users at a future date.
4. Don’t worry about exactly how the t object manages to do this; the beauty of abstraction layers is that we don’t have to know. We can just trust the t object to do its job.
5. Officially pronounced “ess-cue-ell-ite”, although the (mis)pronunciation “sequel-ite” is also common.
6. In case you’re curious about "2011-12-05 00:57:46", I’m not writing this after midnight; the timestamps are recorded in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which for most practical purposes is the same as Greenwich Mean Time. From the NIST Time and Frequency FAQ: Q: Why is UTC used as the acronym for Coordinated Universal Time instead of CUT? A: In 1970 the Coordinated Universal Time system was devised by an international advisory group of technical experts within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU felt it was best to designate a single abbreviation for use in all languages in order to minimize confusion. Since unanimous agreement could not be achieved on using either the English word order, CUT, or the French word order, TUC, the acronym UTC was chosen as a compromise.
7. Note the value of user.updated_at. Told you the timestamp was in UTC.
8. Exceptions and exception handling are somewhat advanced Ruby subjects, and we won’t need them much in this book. They are important, though, and I suggest learning about them using one of the Ruby books recommended in Section 1.1.1
9. I’ll omit the output of console commands when they are not particularly instructive—for example, the results of User.new
10. Note that, in Table 6.1, “letter” really means “lower-case letter”, but the i at the end of the regex enforces case-insensitive matching.
11. If you find it as useful as I do, I encourage you to donate to Rubular to reward developer Michael Lovitt for his wonderful work.
12. Did you know that "Michael Hartl"@example.com, with quotation marks and a space in the middle, is a valid email address according to the standard? Incredibly, it is—but it’s absurd. If you don’t have an email address that contains only letters, numbers, underscores, and dots, then I recommend getting one. N.B. The regex in Listing 6.17 allows plus signs, too, because Gmail (and possibly other email services) does something useful with them: to filter email from example.com, you can use username+example@gmail.com, which will go to the Gmail address username@gmail.com, allowing you to filter on the string example
13. As noted briefly in the introduction to this section, there is a dedicated test database, db/test.sqlite3, for this purpose.
14. Technically, only the domain part of the email address is case-insensitive: foo@bar.com is actually different from Foo@bar.com. In practice, though, it is a bad idea to rely on this fact; as noted at about.com, “Since the case sensitivity of email addresses can create a lot of confusion, interoperability problems and widespread headaches, it would be foolish to require email addresses to be typed with the correct case. Hardly any email service or ISP does enforce case sensitive email addresses, returning messages whose recipient’s email address was not typed correctly (in all upper case, for example). ” Thanks to reader Riley Moses for pointing this out.
15. Of course, we could just edit the migration file for the users table in Listing 6.2 but that would require rolling back and then migrating back up. The Rails Way is to use migrations every time we discover that our data model needs to change.
16. Direct experimentation with SQLite on my system and PostgreSQL on Heroku show that this step is, in fact, necessary.
17. http://railstutorial.org/book?version=3.0

Now that we have a working User model, it’s time to add an ability few websites can live without: letting users sign up for the site. We’ll use an HTML form to submit user signup information to our application in Section 7.2, which will then be used to create a new user and save its attributes to the database in Section 7.4. At the end of the signup process, it’s important to render a profile page with the newly created user’s information, so we’ll begin by making a page for showing users, which will serve as the first step toward implementing the REST architecture for users (Section 2.2.2). As usual, we’ll write tests as we develop, extending the theme of using RSpec and Capybara to write succinct and expressive integration tests.

In order to make a user profile page, we need to have a user in the database, which introduces a chicken-and-egg problem: how can the site have a user before there is a working signup page? Happily, this problem has already been solved: in Section 6.3.5, we created a User record by hand using the Rails console. If you skipped that section, you should go there now and complete it before proceeding.

If you’re following along with version control, make a topic branch as usual:

$git checkout master$ git checkout -b sign-up


## 7.1 Showing users

In this section, we’ll take the first steps toward the final profile by making a page to display a user’s name and profile photo, as indicated by the mockup in Figure 7.1.1 Our eventual goal for the user profile pages is to show the user’s profile image, basic user data, and a list of microposts, as mocked up in Figure 7.2.2 (Figure 7.2 has our first example of lorem ipsum text, which has a fascinating story that you should definitely read about some time.) We’ll complete this task, and with it the sample application, in Chapter 11.

### 7.1.1 Debug and Rails environments

The profiles in this section will be the first truly dynamic pages in our application. Although the view will exist as a single page of code, each profile will be customized using information retrieved from the site’s database. As preparation for adding dynamic pages to our sample application, now is a good time to add some debug information to our site layout (Listing 7.1). This displays some useful information about each page using the built-in debug method and params variable (which we’ll learn more about in Section 7.1.2).

Listing 7.1. Adding some debug information to the site layout.
app/views/layouts/application.html.erb
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
.
.
.
<body>
<div class="container">
<%= yield %>
<%= render 'layouts/footer' %>
<%= debug(params) if Rails.env.development? %>
</div>
</body>
</html>


To make the debug output look nice, we’ll add some rules to the custom stylesheet created in Chapter 5, as shown in Listing 7.2.

Listing 7.2. Adding code for a pretty debug box, including a Sass mixin.
app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss
@import "bootstrap";

/* mixins, variables, etc. */

$grayMediumLight: #eaeaea; @mixin box_sizing { -moz-box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-box-sizing: border-box; box-sizing: border-box; } . . . /* miscellaneous */ .debug_dump { clear: both; float: left; width: 100%; margin-top: 45px; @include box_sizing; }  This introduces the Sass mixin facility, in this case called box_sizing. A mixin allows a group of CSS rules to be packaged up and used for multiple elements, converting .debug_dump { . . . @include box_sizing; }  to .debug_dump { . . . -moz-box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-box-sizing: border-box; box-sizing: border-box; }  We’ll put this mixin to use again in Section 7.2.2. The result in the case of the debug box is shown in Figure 7.3. The debug output in Figure 7.3 gives potentially useful information about the page being rendered: --- controller: static_pages action: home  This is a YAML3 representation of params, which is basically a hash, and in this case identifies the controller and action for the page. We’ll see another example in Section 7.1.2 Since we don’t want to display debug information to users of a deployed application, Listing 7.1 uses if Rails.env.development?  to restrict the debug information to the development environment, which is one of three environments defined by default in Rails (Box 7.1).4 In particular, Rails.env.development? is true only in a development environment, so the Embedded Ruby <%= debug(params) if Rails.env.development? %>  won’t be inserted into production applications or tests. (Inserting the debug information into tests probably wouldn’t do any harm, but it probably wouldn’t do any good, either, so it’s best to restrict the debug display to development only.) ### 7.1.2 A Users resource At the end of Chapter 6, we created a new user in the database. As seen in Section 6.3.5, this user has id 1, and our goal now is to make a page to display this user’s information. We’ll follow the conventions of the REST architecture favored in Rails applications (Box 2.2), which means representing data as resources that can be created, shown, updated, or destroyed—four actions corresponding to the four fundamental operations POST, GET, PUT, and DELETE defined by the HTTP standard (Box 3.2). When following REST principles, resources are typically referenced using the resource name and a unique identifier. What this means in the context of users—which we’re now thinking of as a Users resource—is that we should view the user with id 1 by issuing a GET request to the URI /users/1. Here the show action is implicit in the type of request—when Rails’ REST features are activated, GET requests are automatically handled by the show action. We saw in Section 2.2.1 that the page for a user with id 1 has URI /users/1. Unfortunately, visiting that URI right now just gives an error (Figure 7.4). We can get the REST-style URI to work by adding a single line to our routes file (config/routes.rb): resources :users  The result appears in Listing 7.3. Listing 7.3. Adding a Users resource to the routes file. config/routes.rb SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do resources :users root to: 'static_pages#home' match '/signup', to: 'users#new' . . . end  You might have noticed that Listing 7.3 removes the line get "users/new"  last seen in Listing 5.32. This is because resources :users doesn’t just add a working /users/1 URI; it endows our sample application with all the actions needed for a RESTful Users resource,5 along with a large number of named routes (Section 5.3.3) for generating user URIs. The resulting correspondence of URIs, actions, and named routes is shown in Table 7.1. (Compare to Table 2.2.) Over the course of the next three chapters, we’ll cover all of the other entries in Table 7.1 as we fill in all the actions necessary to make Users a fully RESTful resource. HTTP requestURIActionNamed routePurpose GET/usersindexusers_pathpage to list all users GET/users/1showuser_path(user)page to show user GET/users/newnewnew_user_pathpage to make a new user (signup) POST/userscreateusers_pathcreate a new user GET/users/1/editeditedit_user_path(user)page to edit user with id 1 PUT/users/1updateuser_path(user)update user DELETE/users/1destroyuser_path(user)delete user Table 7.1: RESTful routes provided by the Users resource in Listing 7.3. With the code in Listing 7.3, the routing works, but there’s still no page there (Figure 7.5). To fix this, we’ll begin with a minimalist version of the profile page, which we’ll flesh out in Section 7.1.4. We’ll use the standard Rails location for showing a user, which is app/views/users/show.html.erb. Unlike the new.html.erb view, which we created with the generator in Listing 5.28, the show.html.erb file doesn’t currently exist, so you’ll have to create it by hand, filling it with the content shown in Listing 7.4. Listing 7.4. A stub view for showing user information. app/views/users/show.html.erb <%= @user.name %>, <%= @user.email %>  This view uses Embedded Ruby to display the user’s name and email address, assuming the existence of an instance variable called @user. Of course, eventually the real user show page will look very different, and won’t display the email address publicly. In order to get the user show view to work, we need to define an @user variable in the corresponding show action in the Users controller. As you might expect, we use the find method on the User model (Section 6.1.4) to retrieve the user from the database, as shown in Listing 7.5. Listing 7.5. The Users controller with a show action. app/controllers/users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController def show @user = User.find(params[:id]) end def new end end  Here we’ve used params to retrieve the user id. When we make the appropriate request to the Users controller, params[:id] will be the user id 1, so the effect is the same as the find method User.find(1)  we saw in Section 6.1.4. (Technically, params[:id] is the string "1", but find is smart enough to convert this to an integer.) With the user view and action defined, the URI /users/1 works perfectly (Figure 7.6). Note that the debug information in Figure 7.6 confirms the value of params[:id]: --- action: show controller: users id: '1'  This is why the code User.find(params[:id])  in Listing 7.5 finds the user with id 1. ### 7.1.3 Testing the user show page (with factories) Now that we have a minimal working profile, it’s time to start working on the version mocked up in Figure 7.1. As with the creation of static pages (Chapter 3) and the User model (Chapter 6), we’ll proceed using test-driven development. Recall from Section 5.4.2 that we have elected to use integration tests for the pages associated with the Users resource. In the case of the signup page, our test first visits the signup_path and then checks for the right h1 and title tags, as seen in Listing 5.31 and reproduced in Listing 7.6. (Note that we’ve omitted the full_title helper from Section 5.3.4 since the full title is already adequately tested there.) Listing 7.6. A recap of the initial User pages spec. spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe "User pages" do subject { page } describe "signup page" do before { visit signup_path } it { should have_selector('h1', text: 'Sign up') } it { should have_selector('title', text: 'Sign up') } end end  To test the user show page, we’ll need a User model object so that the code in the show action (Listing 7.5) has something to find: describe "profile page" do # Code to make a user variable before { visit user_path(user) } it { should have_selector('h1', text: user.name) } it { should have_selector('title', text: user.name) } end  where we need to fill in the comment with the appropriate code. This uses the user_path named route (Table 7.1) to generate the path to the show page for the given user. It then tests that the h1 and title tags both contain the user’s name. In order to make the necessary User model object, we could use Active Record to create a user with User.create, but experience shows that user factories are a more convenient way to define user objects and insert them in the database. We’ll be using the factories generated by Factory Girl, a Ruby gem produced by the good people at thoughtbot. As with RSpec, Factory Girl defines a domain-specific language in Ruby, in this case specialized for defining Active Record objects. The syntax is simple, relying on Ruby blocks and custom methods to define the attributes of the desired object. For cases such as the one in this chapter, the advantage over Active Record may not be obvious, but we’ll use more advanced features of factories in future chapters. For example, in Section 9.3.3 it will be important to create a sequence of users with unique email addresses, and factories make it easy to do this. As with other Ruby gems, we can install Factory Girl by adding a line to the Gemfile used by Bundler (Listing 7.7). (Since Factory Girl is only needed in the tests, we’ve put it in the :test group.) Listing 7.7. Adding Factory Girl to the Gemfile. source 'https://rubygems.org' . . . group :test do . . . gem 'factory_girl_rails', '4.1.0' end . . . end  Then install as usual: $ bundle install


We’ll put all our Factory Girl factories in the file spec/factories.rb, which automatically gets loaded by RSpec. The code needed to make a User factory appears in Listing 7.8.

Listing 7.8. A factory to simulate User model objects.
spec/factories.rb
FactoryGirl.define do
factory :user do
name     "Michael Hartl"
email    "michael@example.com"
end
end


By passing the symbol :user to the factory command, we tell Factory Girl that the subsequent definition is for a User model object.

With the definition in Listing 7.8, we can create a User factory in the tests using the let command (Box 6.3) and the FactoryGirl method supplied by Factory Girl:

let(:user) { FactoryGirl.create(:user) }


The final result appears in Listing 7.9.

Listing 7.9. A test for the user show page.
spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

describe "User pages" do

subject { page }

describe "profile page" do
let(:user) { FactoryGirl.create(:user) }
before { visit user_path(user) }

it { should have_selector('h1',    text: user.name) }
it { should have_selector('title', text: user.name) }
end
.
.
.
end


You should verify at this point that the test suite is red:

$bundle exec rspec spec/  We can get the tests to green with the code in Listing 7.10. Listing 7.10. Adding a title and heading for the user profile page. app/views/users/show.html.erb <% provide(:title, @user.name) %> <h1><%= @user.name %></h1>  Running the tests again should confirm that the test in Listing 7.9 is passing: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


One thing you will quickly notice when running tests with Factory Girl is that they are slow. The reason is not Factory Girl’s fault, and in fact it is a feature, not a bug. The issue is that the BCrypt algorithm used in Section 6.3.1 to create a secure password hash is slow by design: BCrypt’s slow speed is part of what makes it so hard to attack. Unfortunately, this means that creating users can bog down the test suite; happily, there is an easy fix. BCrypt uses a cost factor to control how computationally costly it is to create the secure hash. The default value is designed for security, not for speed, which is perfect for production applications, but in tests our needs are reversed: we want fast tests, and don’t care at all about the security of the test users’ password hashes. The solution is to add a few lines to the test configuration file, config/environments/test.rb, redefining the cost factor from its secure default value to its fast minimum value, as shown in Listing 7.11. Even for a small test suite, the gains in speed from this step can be considerable, and I strongly recommend including Listing 7.11 in your test.rb.

Listing 7.11. Redefining the BCrypt cost factor in a test environment.
config/environments/test.rb
SampleApp::Application.configure do
.
.
.
# Speed up tests by lowering BCrypt's cost function.
require 'bcrypt'
silence_warnings do
BCrypt::Engine::DEFAULT_COST = BCrypt::Engine::MIN_COST
end
end


### 7.1.4 A Gravatar image and a sidebar

Having defined a basic user page in the previous section, we’ll now flesh it out a little with a profile image for each user and the first cut of the user sidebar. When making views, we’ll focus on the visual appearance and not worry too much about the exact structure of the page, which means that (at least for now) we won’t be writing tests. When we come to more error-prone aspects of view, such as pagination (Section 9.3.3), we’ll resume test-driven development.

We’ll start by adding a “globally recognized avatar”, or Gravatar, to the user profile.6 Originally created by Tom Preston-Werner (cofounder of GitHub) and later acquired by Automattic (the makers of WordPress), Gravatar is a free service that allows users to upload images and associate them with email addresses they control. Gravatars are a convenient way to include user profile images without going through the trouble of managing image upload, cropping, and storage; all we need to do is construct the proper Gravatar image URI using the user’s email address and the corresponding Gravatar image will automatically appear.7

Our plan is to define a gravatar_for helper function to return a Gravatar image for a given user, as shown in Listing 7.12.

Listing 7.12. The user show view with name and Gravatar.
app/views/users/show.html.erb
<% provide(:title, @user.name) %>
<h1>
<%= gravatar_for @user %>
<%= @user.name %>
</h1>


You can verify at this point that the test suite is failing:

$bundle exec rspec spec/  Because the gravatar_for method is undefined, the user show view is currently broken. (Catching errors of this nature is perhaps the most useful aspect of view specs. This is why having some test of the view, even a minimalist one, is so important.) By default, methods defined in any helper file are automatically available in any view, but for convenience we’ll put the gravatar_for method in the file for helpers associated with the Users controller. As noted at the Gravatar home page, Gravatar URIs are based on an MD5 hash of the user’s email address. In Ruby, the MD5 hashing algorithm is implemented using the hexdigest method, which is part of the Digest library: >> email = "MHARTL@example.COM". >> Digest::MD5::hexdigest(email.downcase) => "1fda4469bcbec3badf5418269ffc5968"  Since email addresses are case-insensitive (Section 6.2.4) but MD5 hashes are not, we’ve used the downcase method to ensure that the argument to hexdigest is all lower-case. The resulting gravatar_for helper appears in Listing 7.13. Listing 7.13. Defining a gravatar_for helper method. app/helpers/users_helper.rb module UsersHelper # Returns the Gravatar (http://gravatar.com/) for the given user. def gravatar_for(user) gravatar_id = Digest::MD5::hexdigest(user.email.downcase) gravatar_url = "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/#{gravatar_id}" image_tag(gravatar_url, alt: user.name, class: "gravatar") end end  The code in Listing 7.13 returns an image tag for the Gravatar with a "gravatar" class and alt text equal to the user’s name (which is especially convenient for sight-impaired users using a screen reader). You can confirm that the test suite is now passing: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


The profile page appears as in Figure 7.7, which shows the default Gravatar image, which appears because user@example.com is an invalid email address (the example.com domain is reserved for examples).

To get our application to display a custom Gravatar, we’ll use update_attributes (Section 6.1.5) to update the user in the database:

$rails console >> user = User.first >> user.update_attributes(name: "Example User", ?> email: "example@railstutorial.org", ?> password: "foobar", ?> password_confirmation: "foobar") => true  Here we’ve assigned the user the email address example@railstutorial.org, which I’ve associated with the Rails Tutorial logo, as seen in Figure 7.8. The last element needed to complete the mockup from Figure 7.1 is the initial version of the user sidebar. We’ll implement it using the aside tag, which is used for content (such as sidebars) that complements the rest of the page but can also stand alone. We include row and span4 classes, which are both part of Bootstrap. The code for the modified user show page appears in Listing 7.14. Listing 7.14. Adding a sidebar to the user show view. app/views/users/show.html.erb <% provide(:title, @user.name) %> <div class="row"> <aside class="span4"> <section> <h1> <%= gravatar_for @user %> <%= @user.name %> </h1> </section> </aside> </div>  With the HTML elements and CSS classes in place, we can style the profile page (including the sidebar and the Gravatar) with the SCSS shown in Listing 7.15. (Note the nesting of the table CSS rules, which works only because of the Sass engine used by the asset pipeline.) The resulting page is shown in Figure 7.9. Listing 7.15. SCSS for styling the user show page, including the sidebar. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss . . . /* sidebar */ aside { section { padding: 10px 0; border-top: 1px solid$grayLighter;
&:first-child {
border: 0;
}
span {
display: block;
margin-bottom: 3px;
line-height: 1;
}
h1 {
font-size: 1.4em;
text-align: left;
letter-spacing: -1px;
margin-bottom: 3px;
margin-top: 0px;
}
}
}

.gravatar {
float: left;
margin-right: 10px;
}


## 7.2 Signup form

Now that we have a working (though not yet complete) user profile page, we’re ready to make a signup form for our site. We saw in Figure 5.9 (shown again in Figure 7.10) that the signup page is currently blank: useless for signing up new users. The goal of this section is to start changing this sad state of affairs by producing the signup form mocked up in Figure 7.11.

Since we’re about to add the ability to create new users through the web, let’s remove the user created at the console in Section 6.3.5. The cleanest way to do this is to reset the database with the db:reset Rake task:

$bundle exec rake db:reset  After resetting the database, on some systems the test database needs to be re-prepared as well: $ bundle exec rake db:test:prepare


Finally, on some systems you might have to restart the web server (using Ctrl-C) for the changes to take effect.8

### 7.2.1 Tests for user signup

In the days before powerful web frameworks with full testing capabilities, testing was often painful and error-prone. For example, to test a signup page manually, we would have to visit the page in a browser and then submit alternately invalid and valid data, verifying in each case that the application’s behavior was correct. Moreover, we would have to remember to repeat the process any time the application changed. With RSpec and Capybara, we will be able to write expressive tests to automate tasks that used to have to be done by hand.

We’ve already seen how Capybara supports an intuitive web-navigation syntax. So far, we’ve mostly used visit to visit particular pages, but Capybara can do a lot more, including filling in the kind of fields we see in Figure 7.11 and clicking on the button. The syntax looks like this:

visit signup_path
fill_in "Name", with: "Example User"
.
.
.
click_button "Create my account"


Our goal now is to write tests for the right behavior given invalid and valid signup information. Because these tests are fairly advanced, we’ll build them up piece by piece. If you want to see how they work (including which file to put them in), you can skip ahead to Listing 7.16.

Our first task is to test for a failing signup form, and we can simulate the submission of invalid data by visiting the page and clicking the button using click_button:

visit signup_path
click_button "Create my account"


This is equivalent to visiting the signup page and submitting blank signup information (which is invalid). Similarly, to simulate the submission of valid data, we fill in valid information using fill_in:

visit signup_path
fill_in "Name",         with: "Example User"
fill_in "Email",        with: "user@example.com"
fill_in "Confirmation", with: "foobar"
click_button "Create my account"


The purpose of our tests is to verify that clicking the signup button results in the correct behavior, creating a new user when the information is valid and not creating a user when it’s invalid. The way to do this is to check the count of users, and under the hood our tests will use the count method available on every Active Record class, including User:

$rails console >> User.count => 0  Here User.count is 0 because we reset the database at the beginning of this section. When submitting invalid data, we expect the user count not to change; when submitting valid data, we expect it to change by 1. We can express this in RSpec by combining the expect method with either the to method or the not_to method. We’ll start with the invalid case since it is simpler; we visit the signup path and click the button, and we expect it not to change the user count: visit signup_path expect { click_button "Create my account" }.not_to change(User, :count)  Note that, as indicated by the curly braces, expect wraps click_button in a block (Section 4.3.2). This is for the benefit of the change method, which takes as arguments an object and a symbol and then calculates the result of calling that symbol as a method on the object both before and after the block. In other words, the code expect { click_button "Create my account" }.not_to change(User, :count)  calculates User.count  before and after the execution of click_button "Create my account"  In the present case, we want the given code not to change the count, which we express using the not_to method. In effect, by enclosing the button click in a block we are able to replace initial = User.count click_button "Create my account" final = User.count initial.should == final  with the single line expect { click_button "Create my account" }.not_to change(User, :count)  which reads like natural language and is much more compact. The case of valid data is similar, but instead of verifying that the user count doesn’t change, we check that clicking the button changes the count by 1: visit signup_path fill_in "Name", with: "Example User" fill_in "Email", with: "user@example.com" fill_in "Password", with: "foobar" fill_in "Confirmation", with: "foobar" expect do click_button "Create my account" end.to change(User, :count).by(1)  This uses the to method because we expect a click on the signup button with valid data to change the user count by one. Combining the two cases with the appropriate describe blocks and pulling the common code into before blocks yields good basic tests for signing up users, as shown in Listing 7.16. Here we’ve factored out the common text for the submit button using the let method to define a submit variable. Listing 7.16. Good basic tests for signing up users. spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb require 'spec_helper' describe "User pages" do subject { page } . . . describe "signup" do before { visit signup_path } let(:submit) { "Create my account" } describe "with invalid information" do it "should not create a user" do expect { click_button submit }.not_to change(User, :count) end end describe "with valid information" do before do fill_in "Name", with: "Example User" fill_in "Email", with: "user@example.com" fill_in "Password", with: "foobar" fill_in "Confirmation", with: "foobar" end it "should create a user" do expect { click_button submit }.to change(User, :count).by(1) end end end end  We’ll add a few more tests as needed in the sections that follow, but the basic tests in Listing 7.16 already cover an impressive amount of functionality. To get them to pass, we have to create a signup page with just the right elements, arrange for the page’s submission to be routed to the right place, and successfully create a new user in the database only if the resulting user data is valid. Of course, at this point the tests should fail: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


### 7.2.2 Using form_for

Now that we have good failing tests for user signup, we’ll start getting them to pass by making a form for signing up users. We can accomplish this in Rails with the form_for helper method, which takes in an Active Record object and constructs a form using the object’s attributes. The result appears in Listing 7.17. (Readers familiar with Rails 2.x should note that form_for uses the “percent-equals” ERb syntax for inserting content; that is, where Rails 2.x used <% form_for ... %>, Rails 3 uses <%= form_for ... %> instead.)

app/views/users/new.html.erb
<% provide(:title, 'Sign up') %>

<div class="row">
<div class="span6 offset3">
<%= form_for(@user) do |f| %>

<%= f.label :name %>
<%= f.text_field :name %>

<%= f.label :email %>
<%= f.text_field :email %>

<%= f.submit "Create my account", class: "btn btn-large btn-primary" %>
<% end %>
</div>
</div>


Let’s break this down into pieces. The presence of the do keyword indicates that form_for takes a block with one variable, which we’ve called f for “form”:

<%= form_for(@user) do |f| %>
.
.
.
<% end %>


As is usually the case with Rails helpers, we don’t need to know any details about the implementation, but what we do need to know is what the f object does: when called with a method corresponding to an HTML form element—such as a text field, radio button, or password field—it returns code for that element specifically designed to set an attribute of the @user object. In other words,

<%= f.label :name %>
<%= f.text_field :name %>


creates the HTML needed to make a labeled text field element appropriate for setting the name attribute of a User model. (We’ll take a look at the HTML itself in Section 7.2.3.)

To see this in action, we need to drill down and look at the actual HTML produced by this form, but here we have a problem: the page currently breaks, because we have not set the @user variable—like all undefined instance variables (Section 4.4.5), @user is currently nil. Appropriately, if you run your test suite at this point, you’ll see that the tests for the structure of the signup page from Listing 7.6 (i.e., the h1 and the title) now fail:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb -e "signup page"  (The -e here arranges to run just the examples whose description strings match "signup page". Note in particular that this is not the substring "signup", which would run all the test in Listing 7.16.) To get these tests to pass again and to get our form to render, we must define an @user variable in the controller action corresponding to new.html.erb, i.e., the new action in the Users controller. The form_for helper expects @user to be a User object, and since we’re creating a new user we simply use User.new, as seen in Listing 7.18. Listing 7.18. Adding an @user variable to the new action. app/controllers/users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController . . . def new @user = User.new end end  With the @user variable so defined, the test for the signup page should be passing again: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb -e "signup page"


At this point, the form (with the styling from Listing 7.19) appears as in Figure 7.12. Note the reuse of the box_sizing mixin from Listing 7.2.

Listing 7.19. CSS for the signup form.
app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss
.
.
.

/* forms */

input, textarea, select, .uneditable-input {
border: 1px solid #bbb;
width: 100%;
margin-bottom: 15px;
@include box_sizing;
}

input {
height: auto !important;
}


### 7.2.3 The form HTML

As indicated by Figure 7.12, the signup page now renders properly, indicating that the form_for code in Listing 7.17 is producing valid HTML. If you look at the HTML for the generated form (using either Firebug or the “view page source” feature of your browser), you should see markup as in Listing 7.20. Although many of the details are irrelevant for our purposes, let’s take a moment to highlight the most important parts of its structure.

Listing 7.20. The HTML for the form in Figure 7.12.
<form accept-charset="UTF-8" action="/users" class="new_user"
id="new_user" method="post">

<label for="user_name">Name</label>
<input id="user_name" name="user[name]" size="30" type="text" />

<label for="user_email">Email</label>
<input id="user_email" name="user[email]" size="30" type="text" />

<input class="btn btn-large btn-primary" name="commit" type="submit"
value="Create my account" />
</form>


(Here I’ve omitted some HTML related to the authenticity token, which Rails automatically includes to thwart a particular kind of attack called a cross-site request forgery (CSRF). See the Stack Overflow entry on the Rails authenticity token if you’re interested in the details of how this works and why it’s important.)

We’ll start with the internal structure of the document. Comparing Listing 7.17 with Listing 7.20, we see that the Embedded Ruby

<%= f.label :name %>
<%= f.text_field :name %>


produces the HTML

<label for="user_name">Name</label>
<input id="user_name" name="user[name]" size="30" type="text" />


and

<%= f.label :password %>


produces the HTML

<label for="user_password">Password</label><br />


As seen in Figure 7.13, text fields (type="text") simply display their contents, whereas password fields (type="password") obscure the input for security purposes, as seen in Figure 7.13.

As we’ll see in Section 7.4, the key to creating a user is the special name attribute in each input:

<input id="user_name" name="user[name]" - - - />
.
.
.


These name values allow Rails to construct an initialization hash (via the params variable) for creating users using the values entered by the user, as we’ll see in Section 7.3.

The second important element is the form tag itself. Rails creates the form tag using the @user object: because every Ruby object knows its own class (Section 4.4.1), Rails figures out that @user is of class User; moreover, since @user is a new user, Rails knows to construct a form with the post method, which is the proper verb for creating a new object (Box 3.2):

<form action="/users" class="new_user" id="new_user" method="post">


Here the class and id attributes are largely irrelevant; what’s important is action="/users" and method="post". Together, these constitute instructions to issue an HTTP POST request to the /users URI. We’ll see in the next two sections what effects this has.

## 7.3 Signup failure

Although we’ve briefly examined the HTML for the form in Figure 7.12 (shown in Listing 7.20), it’s best understood in the context of signup failure. In this section, we’ll create a signup form that accepts an invalid submission and re-renders the signup page with a list of errors, as mocked up in Figure 7.14.

### 7.3.1 A working form

Our first step is to eliminate the error that currently results when submitting the signup form, as you can verify in your browser or by running the test for signup with invalid information:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb \ > -e "signup with invalid information"  Recall from Section 7.1.2 that adding resources :users to the routes.rb file (Listing 7.3) automatically ensures that our Rails application responds to the RESTful URIs from Table 7.1. In particular, it ensures that a POST request to /users is handled by the create action. Our strategy for the create action is to use the form submission to make a new user object using User.new, try (and fail) to save that user, and then render the signup page for possible resubmission. Let’s get started by reviewing the code for the signup form: <form action="/users" class="new_user" id="new_user" method="post">  As noted in Section 7.2.3, this HTML issues a POST request to the /users URI. We can get the test for invalid information from Listing 7.16 to pass with the code in Listing 7.21. This listing includes a second use of the render method, which we first saw in the context of partials (Section 5.1.3); as you can see, render works in controller actions as well. Note that we’ve taken this opportunity to introduce an if-else branching structure, which allows us to handle the cases of failure and success separately based on the value of @user.save, which (as we saw in Section 6.1.3) is either true or false depending on whether the save succeeds. Listing 7.21. A create action that can handle signup failure (but not success). app/controllers/users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController . . . def create @user = User.new(params[:user]) if @user.save # Handle a successful save. else render 'new' end end end  The best way to understand how the code in Listing 7.21 works is to submit the form with some invalid signup data; the result appears in Figure 7.15, and the full debug information appears in Figure 7.16. To get a clearer picture of how Rails handles the submission, let’s take a closer look at the params hash from the debug information (Figure 7.16): --- user: name: Foo Bar password_confirmation: foo password: bar email: foo@invalid commit: Create my account action: create controller: users  We saw starting in Section 7.1.2 that the params hash contains information about each request; in the case of a URI like /users/1, the value of params[:id] is the id of the corresponding user (1 in this example). In the case of posting to the signup form, params instead contains a hash of hashes, a construction we first saw in Section 4.3.3, which introduced the strategically named params variable in a console session. The debug information above shows that submitting the form results in a user hash with attributes corresponding to the submitted values, where the keys come from the name attributes of the input tags seen in Listing 7.17; for example, the value of <input id="user_email" name="user[email]" size="30" type="text" />  with name "user[email]" is precisely the email attribute of the user hash. Although the hash keys appear as strings in the debug output, internally Rails uses symbols, so that params[:user] is the hash of user attributes—in fact, exactly the attributes needed as an argument to User.new, as first seen in Section 4.4.5 and appearing in Listing 7.21. This means that the line @user = User.new(params[:user])  is equivalent to @user = User.new(name: "Foo Bar", email: "foo@invalid", password: "foo", password_confirmation: "bar")  Of course, instantiating such a variable has implications for successful signup—as we’ll see in Section 7.4, once @user is defined properly, calling @user.save is all that’s needed to complete the registration—but it has consequences even in the failed signup considered here. Note in Figure 7.15 that the fields are pre-filled with the data from the failed submission. This is because form_for automatically fills in the fields with the attributes of the @user object, so that, for example, if @user.name is "Foo" then <%= form_for(@user) do |f| %> <%= f.label :name %> <%= f.text_field :name %> . . .  will produce the HTML <form action="/users" class="new_user" id="new_user" method="post"> <label for="user_name">Name</label><br /> <input id="user_name" name="user[name]" size="30" type="text" value="Foo"/> . . .  Here the value of the input tag is "Foo", so that’s what appears in the text field. As you might guess, now that we can submit a form without generating an error, the test for invalid submission should pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb \
> -e "signup with invalid information"


### 7.3.2 Signup error messages

Though not strictly necessary, it’s helpful to output error messages on failed signup to indicate the problems that prevented successful user registration. Rails provides just such messages based on the User model validations. For example, consider trying to save a user with an invalid email address and with a password that’s too short:

$rails console >> user = User.new(name: "Foo Bar", email: "foo@invalid", ?> password: "dude", password_confirmation: "dude") >> user.save => false >> user.errors.full_messages => ["Email is invalid", "Password is too short (minimum is 6 characters)"]  Here the errors.full_messages object (which we saw briefly in Section 6.2.2) contains an array of error messages. As in the console session above, the failed save in Listing 7.21 generates a list of error messages associated with the @user object. To display the messages in the browser, we’ll render an error-messages partial on the user new page, as shown in Listing 7.22. (Writing a test for the error messages first is a good idea and is left as an exercise; see Section 7.6.) It’s worth noting that this error messages partial is only a first attempt; the final version appears in Section 10.3.2. Listing 7.22. Code to display error messages on the signup form. app/views/users/new.html.erb <% provide(:title, 'Sign up') %> <h1>Sign up</h1> <div class="row"> <div class="span6 offset3"> <%= form_for(@user) do |f| %> <%= render 'shared/error_messages' %> . . . <% end %> </div> </div>  Notice here that we render a partial called ’shared/error_messages’; this reflects the common Rails convention of using a dedicated shared/ directory for partials expected to be used in views across multiple controllers. (We’ll see this expectation fulfilled in Section 9.1.1.) This means that we have to create both the new app/views/shared directory and the _error_messages.html.erb partial file. The partial itself appears in Listing 7.23. Listing 7.23. A partial for displaying form submission error messages. app/views/shared/_error_messages.html.erb <% if @user.errors.any? %> <div id="error_explanation"> <div class="alert alert-error"> The form contains <%= pluralize(@user.errors.count, "error") %>. </div> <ul> <% @user.errors.full_messages.each do |msg| %> <li>* <%= msg %></li> <% end %> </ul> </div> <% end %>  This partial introduces several new Rails and Ruby constructs, including two methods for Rails error objects. The first method is count, which simply returns the number of errors: >> user.errors.count => 2  The other new method is any?, which (together with empty?) is one of a pair of complementary methods: >> user.errors.empty? => false >> user.errors.any? => true  We see here that the empty? method, which we first saw in Section 4.2.3 in the context of strings, also works on Rails error objects, returning true for an empty object and false otherwise. The any? method is just the opposite of empty?, returning true if there are any elements present and false otherwise. (By the way, all of these methods—count, empty?, and any?—work on Ruby arrays as well. We’ll put this fact to good use starting in Section 10.2.) The other new idea is the pluralize text helper. It isn’t available in the console by default, but we can include it explicitly through the ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper module:9 >> include ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper >> pluralize(1, "error") => "1 error" >> pluralize(5, "error") => "5 errors"  We see here that pluralize takes an integer argument and then returns the number with a properly pluralized version of its second argument. Underlying this method is a powerful inflector that knows how to pluralize a large number of words, including many with irregular plurals: >> pluralize(2, "woman") => "2 women" >> pluralize(3, "erratum") => "3 errata"  As a result of its use of pluralize, the code <%= pluralize(@user.errors.count, "error") %>  returns "0 errors", "1 error", "2 errors", and so on, depending on how many errors there are, thereby avoiding ungrammatical phrases such as "1 errors" (a distressingly common mistake on teh interwebs). Note that Listing 7.23 includes the CSS id error_explanation for use in styling the error messages. (Recall from Section 5.1.2 that CSS uses the pound sign # to style ids.) In addition, on error pages Rails automatically wraps the fields with errors in divs with the CSS class field_with_errors. These labels then allow us to style the error messages with the SCSS shown in Listing 7.24, which makes use of Sass’s @extend function to include the functionality of two Bootstrap classes control-group and error. As a result, on failed submission the error messages appear surrounded by red, as seen in Figure 7.17. Because the messages are generated by the model validations, they will automatically change if you ever change your mind about, say, the format of email addresses, or the minimum length of passwords. Listing 7.24. CSS for styling error messages. app/assets/stylesheets/custom.css.scss . . . /* forms */ . . . #error_explanation { color: #f00; ul { list-style: none; margin: 0 0 18px 0; } } .field_with_errors { @extend .control-group; @extend .error; }  To see the results of our work in this section, we’ll recapitulate the steps in the failed signup test from Listing 7.16 by visiting the signup page and clicking “Create my account” with blank input fields. The result is shown in Figure 7.18. As you might guess from the working page, at this point the corresponding test should also pass: $ bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb \
> -e "signup with invalid information"


Unfortunately, there’s a minor blemish in the error messages shown in Figure 7.18: the error for a missing password reads as “Password digest can’t be blank” instead of the more sensible “Password can’t be blank”. This is due to the password digest presence validation hiding in has_secure_password, as mentioned briefly in Section 6.3.4. Fixing this problem is left as an exercise (Section 7.6).

## 7.4 Signup success

Having handled invalid form submissions, now it’s time to complete the signup form by actually saving a new user (if valid) to the database. First, we try to save the user; if the save succeeds, the user’s information gets written to the database automatically, and we then redirect the browser to show the user’s profile (together with a friendly greeting), as mocked up in Figure 7.19. If it fails, we simply fall back on the behavior developed in Section 7.3.

### 7.4.1 The finished signup form

To complete a working signup form, we need to fill in the commented-out section in Listing 7.21 with the appropriate behavior. Currently, the test for valid submission should be failing:

$bundle exec rspec spec/requests/user_pages_spec.rb \ > -e "signup with valid information"  This is because the default behavior for a Rails action is to render the corresponding view, but there is not (nor should there be) a view template corresponding to the create action. Instead, we need to redirect to a different page, and it makes sense for that page to be the newly created user’s profile. Testing that the proper page gets rendered is left as an exercise (Section 7.6); the application code appears in Listing 7.25. Listing 7.25. The user create action with a save and a redirect. app/controllers/users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController . . . def create @user = User.new(params[:user]) if @user.save redirect_to @user else render 'new' end end end  Note that we can omit the user_url in the redirect, writing simply redirect_to @user to redirect to the user show page. With the code in Listing 7.25, our signup form is working, as you can verify by running the test suite: $ bundle exec rspec spec/


### 7.4.2 The flash

Before submitting a valid registration in a browser, we’re going to add a bit of polish common in web applications: a message that appears on the subsequent page (in this case, welcoming our new user to the application) and then disappears upon visiting a second page or on page reload. The Rails way to accomplish this is to use a special variable called the flash, which operates like flash memory in that it stores its data temporarily. The flash variable is effectively a hash; you may even recall the console example in Section 4.3.3, where we saw how to iterate through a hash using a strategically named flash hash:

\$ rails console
>> flash = { success: "It worked!", error: "It failed." }
=> {:success=>"It worked!", error: "It failed."}
>> flash.each do |key, value|
?>   puts "#{key}"
?>   puts "#{value}"
>> end
success
It worked!
error
It failed.


We can arrange to display the contents of the flash site-wide by including it in our application layout, as in Listing 7.26. (This code is a particularly ugly combination of HTML and ERb; an exercise in Section 7.6 shows how to make it prettier.)

Listing 7.26. Adding the contents of the flash variable to the site layout.
app/views/layouts/application.html.erb
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
.
.
.
<body>
<%= debug(params) if Rails.env.